Eduardo García-Granero1, Francisco Navarro2, Carlos Cerdán Santacruz3, Matteo Frasson1, Alvaro García-Granero1, Franco Marinello4, Blas Flor-Lorente1, Alejandro Espí5. 1. Department of General Surgery, Digestive Surgery Unit. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 2. Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit. Hospital de Manises, Manises, Valencia, Spain. 3. Department of General Surgery, Digestive Surgery Unit. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: carloscerdansantacruz@hotmail.com. 4. Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Vall D´Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain. 5. Department of General Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess whether the individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for anastomotic leak in double-stapled colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal cancer resection. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database consists of a consecutive series of 800 patients who underwent an elective left colon and rectal resection with a colorectal, double-stapled anastomosis between 1993 and 2009 in a specialized colorectal unit of a tertiary hospital with 7 participating surgeons. The main outcome variable was anastomotic leak, defined as leak of luminal contents from a colorectal anastomosis between 2 hollow viscera diagnosed radiologically, clinically, endoscopically, or intraoperatively. Pelvic abscesses were also considered to be an anastomotic leak. Radiologic examination was performed when there was clinical suspicion of leak. RESULTS: Anastomotic leak occurred in 6.1% of patients, of which 33 (67%) were treated operatively, 6 (12%) with radiologic drains, and 10 (21%) by medical treatment. Postoperative mortality rate was 2.9% for the whole group of 800 patients. In patients with anastomotic leak, mortality rate increased up to 16% vs 2.0% in patients without anastomotic leak (P < .0001). At multivariate analysis, rectal location of tumor, male sex, bowel obstruction preoperatively, tobacco use, diabetes, perioperative transfusion, and the individual surgeon were independent risk factors for anastomotic leak. The surgeon was the most important factor (mean odds ratio 4.9; range 1.0 to 13.5). The variance of anastomotic leak between the different surgeons was 0.56 in the logit scale. CONCLUSION: The individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for leakage in double-stapled, colorectal, end-to-end anastomosis after oncologic left-sided colorectal resection.
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess whether the individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for anastomotic leak in double-stapled colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal cancer resection. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database consists of a consecutive series of 800 patients who underwent an elective left colon and rectal resection with a colorectal, double-stapled anastomosis between 1993 and 2009 in a specialized colorectal unit of a tertiary hospital with 7 participating surgeons. The main outcome variable was anastomotic leak, defined as leak of luminal contents from a colorectal anastomosis between 2 hollow viscera diagnosed radiologically, clinically, endoscopically, or intraoperatively. Pelvic abscesses were also considered to be an anastomotic leak. Radiologic examination was performed when there was clinical suspicion of leak. RESULTS:Anastomotic leak occurred in 6.1% of patients, of which 33 (67%) were treated operatively, 6 (12%) with radiologic drains, and 10 (21%) by medical treatment. Postoperative mortality rate was 2.9% for the whole group of 800 patients. In patients with anastomotic leak, mortality rate increased up to 16% vs 2.0% in patients without anastomotic leak (P < .0001). At multivariate analysis, rectal location of tumor, male sex, bowel obstruction preoperatively, tobacco use, diabetes, perioperative transfusion, and the individual surgeon were independent risk factors for anastomotic leak. The surgeon was the most important factor (mean odds ratio 4.9; range 1.0 to 13.5). The variance of anastomotic leak between the different surgeons was 0.56 in the logit scale. CONCLUSION: The individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for leakage in double-stapled, colorectal, end-to-end anastomosis after oncologic left-sided colorectal resection.
Authors: Jachym Rosendorf; Marketa Klicova; Lenka Cervenkova; Richard Palek; Jana Horakova; Andrea Klapstova; Petr Hosek; Vladimira Moulisova; Lukas Bednar; Vaclav Tegl; Ondrej Brzon; Zbynek Tonar; Vladislav Treska; David Lukas; Vaclav Liska Journal: In Vivo Date: 2021 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: L Sánchez-Guillén; M Frasson; Á García-Granero; G Pellino; B Flor-Lorente; E Álvarez-Sarrado; E García-Granero Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Antonio Sciuto; Giovanni Merola; Giovanni D De Palma; Maurizio Sodo; Felice Pirozzi; Umberto M Bracale; Umberto Bracale Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: J A Pereira; A Bravo-Salva; B Montcusí; S Pérez-Farre; L Fresno de Prado; M López-Cano Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 2.102