Brian W Kunkle1, Badri N Vardarajan2,3,4, Adam C Naj5, Patrice L Whitehead1, Sophie Rolati1, Susan Slifer1, Regina M Carney1, Michael L Cuccaro1, Jeffery M Vance1, John R Gilbert1, Li-San Wang6, Lindsay A Farrer7,8,9,10,11, Christiane Reitz2,3,4, Jonathan L Haines12, Gary W Beecham1, Eden R Martin1, Gerard D Schellenberg6, Richard P Mayeux2,3,4,13,14, Margaret A Pericak-Vance1. 1. John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida. 2. The Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, New York. 3. The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, New York. 4. Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 6. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 7. Department of Medicine (Biomedical Genetics), Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Department of Neurology, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Department of Ophthalmology, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 10. Department of Epidemiology, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 11. Department of Biostatistics, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 12. Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 13. Department of Epidemiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York. 14. Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Abstract
Importance: Mutations in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 lead to early-onset Alzheimer disease (EOAD) but account for only approximately 11% of EOAD overall, leaving most of the genetic risk for the most severe form of Alzheimer disease unexplained. This extreme phenotype likely harbors highly penetrant risk variants, making it primed for discovery of novel risk genes and pathways for AD. Objective: To search for rare variants contributing to the risk for EOAD. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case-control study, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed in 51 non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients with EOAD (age at onset <65 years) and 19 Caribbean Hispanic families previously screened as negative for established APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 causal variants. Participants were recruited from John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, Case Western Reserve University, and Columbia University. Rare, deleterious, nonsynonymous, or loss-of-function variants were filtered to identify variants in known and suspected AD genes, variants in multiple unrelated NHW patients, variants present in 19 Hispanic EOAD WES families, and genes with variants in multiple unrelated NHW patients. These variants/genes were tested for association in an independent cohort of 1524 patients with EOAD, 7046 patients with late-onset AD (LOAD), and 7001 cognitively intact controls (age at examination, >65 years) from the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium. The study was conducted from January 21, 2013, to October 13, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Alzheimer disease diagnosed according to standard National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria. Association between Alzheimer disease and genetic variants and genes was measured using logistic regression and sequence kernel association test-optimal gene tests, respectively. Results: Of the 1524 NHW patients with EOAD, 765 (50.2%) were women and mean (SD) age was 60.0 (4.9) years; of the 7046 NHW patients with LOAD, 4171 (59.2%) were women and mean (SD) age was 77.4 (8.6) years; and of the 7001 NHW controls, 4215 (60.2%) were women and mean (SD) age was 77.4 (8.6) years. The gene PSD2, for which multiple unrelated NHW cases had rare missense variants, was significantly associated with EOAD (P = 2.05 × 10-6; Bonferroni-corrected P value [BP] = 1.3 × 10-3) and LOAD (P = 6.22 × 10-6; BP = 4.1 × 10-3). A missense variant in TCIRG1, present in a NHW patient and segregating in 3 cases of a Hispanic family, was more frequent in EOAD cases (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% CI, 0.99-4.55; P = .06; BP = 0.413), and significantly associated with LOAD (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.37-3.62; P = 7.2 × 10-4; BP = 5.0 × 10-3). A missense variant in the LOAD risk gene RIN3 showed suggestive evidence of association with EOAD after Bonferroni correction (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.26-16.48; P = .02, BP = 0.091). In addition, a missense variant in RUFY1 identified in 2 NHW EOAD cases showed suggestive evidence of an association with EOAD as well (OR, 18.63; 95% CI, 1.62-213.45; P = .003; BP = 0.129). Conclusions and Relevance: The genes PSD2, TCIRG1, RIN3, and RUFY1 all may be involved in endolysosomal transport-a process known to be important to development of AD. Furthermore, this study identified shared risk genes between EOAD and LOAD similar to previously reported genes, such as SORL1, PSEN2, and TREM2.
Importance: Mutations in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 lead to early-onset Alzheimer disease (EOAD) but account for only approximately 11% of EOAD overall, leaving most of the genetic risk for the most severe form of Alzheimer disease unexplained. This extreme phenotype likely harbors highly penetrant risk variants, making it primed for discovery of novel risk genes and pathways for AD. Objective: To search for rare variants contributing to the risk for EOAD. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case-control study, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed in 51 non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients with EOAD (age at onset <65 years) and 19 Caribbean Hispanic families previously screened as negative for established APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 causal variants. Participants were recruited from John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, Case Western Reserve University, and Columbia University. Rare, deleterious, nonsynonymous, or loss-of-function variants were filtered to identify variants in known and suspected AD genes, variants in multiple unrelated NHW patients, variants present in 19 Hispanic EOAD WES families, and genes with variants in multiple unrelated NHW patients. These variants/genes were tested for association in an independent cohort of 1524 patients with EOAD, 7046 patients with late-onset AD (LOAD), and 7001 cognitively intact controls (age at examination, >65 years) from the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium. The study was conducted from January 21, 2013, to October 13, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Alzheimer disease diagnosed according to standard National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria. Association between Alzheimer disease and genetic variants and genes was measured using logistic regression and sequence kernel association test-optimal gene tests, respectively. Results: Of the 1524 NHW patients with EOAD, 765 (50.2%) were women and mean (SD) age was 60.0 (4.9) years; of the 7046 NHW patients with LOAD, 4171 (59.2%) were women and mean (SD) age was 77.4 (8.6) years; and of the 7001 NHW controls, 4215 (60.2%) were women and mean (SD) age was 77.4 (8.6) years. The gene PSD2, for which multiple unrelated NHW cases had rare missense variants, was significantly associated with EOAD (P = 2.05 × 10-6; Bonferroni-corrected P value [BP] = 1.3 × 10-3) and LOAD (P = 6.22 × 10-6; BP = 4.1 × 10-3). A missense variant in TCIRG1, present in a NHW patient and segregating in 3 cases of a Hispanic family, was more frequent in EOAD cases (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% CI, 0.99-4.55; P = .06; BP = 0.413), and significantly associated with LOAD (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.37-3.62; P = 7.2 × 10-4; BP = 5.0 × 10-3). A missense variant in the LOAD risk gene RIN3 showed suggestive evidence of association with EOAD after Bonferroni correction (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.26-16.48; P = .02, BP = 0.091). In addition, a missense variant in RUFY1 identified in 2 NHW EOAD cases showed suggestive evidence of an association with EOAD as well (OR, 18.63; 95% CI, 1.62-213.45; P = .003; BP = 0.129). Conclusions and Relevance: The genes PSD2, TCIRG1, RIN3, and RUFY1 all may be involved in endolysosomal transport-a process known to be important to development of AD. Furthermore, this study identified shared risk genes between EOAD and LOAD similar to previously reported genes, such as SORL1, PSEN2, and TREM2.
Authors: Anne M Cataldo; Suzana Petanceska; Nicole B Terio; Corrinne M Peterhoff; Robert Durham; Marc Mercken; Pankaj D Mehta; Joseph Buxbaum; Vahram Haroutunian; Ralph A Nixon Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn Journal: JAMA Date: 1997 Oct 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Adam C Naj; Gyungah Jun; Gary W Beecham; Li-San Wang; Badri Narayan Vardarajan; Jacqueline Buros; Paul J Gallins; Joseph D Buxbaum; Gail P Jarvik; Paul K Crane; Eric B Larson; Thomas D Bird; Bradley F Boeve; Neill R Graff-Radford; Philip L De Jager; Denis Evans; Julie A Schneider; Minerva M Carrasquillo; Nilufer Ertekin-Taner; Steven G Younkin; Carlos Cruchaga; John S K Kauwe; Petra Nowotny; Patricia Kramer; John Hardy; Matthew J Huentelman; Amanda J Myers; Michael M Barmada; F Yesim Demirci; Clinton T Baldwin; Robert C Green; Ekaterina Rogaeva; Peter St George-Hyslop; Steven E Arnold; Robert Barber; Thomas Beach; Eileen H Bigio; James D Bowen; Adam Boxer; James R Burke; Nigel J Cairns; Chris S Carlson; Regina M Carney; Steven L Carroll; Helena C Chui; David G Clark; Jason Corneveaux; Carl W Cotman; Jeffrey L Cummings; Charles DeCarli; Steven T DeKosky; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Malcolm Dick; Dennis W Dickson; William G Ellis; Kelley M Faber; Kenneth B Fallon; Martin R Farlow; Steven Ferris; Matthew P Frosch; Douglas R Galasko; Mary Ganguli; Marla Gearing; Daniel H Geschwind; Bernardino Ghetti; John R Gilbert; Sid Gilman; Bruno Giordani; Jonathan D Glass; John H Growdon; Ronald L Hamilton; Lindy E Harrell; Elizabeth Head; Lawrence S Honig; Christine M Hulette; Bradley T Hyman; Gregory A Jicha; Lee-Way Jin; Nancy Johnson; Jason Karlawish; Anna Karydas; Jeffrey A Kaye; Ronald Kim; Edward H Koo; Neil W Kowall; James J Lah; Allan I Levey; Andrew P Lieberman; Oscar L Lopez; Wendy J Mack; Daniel C Marson; Frank Martiniuk; Deborah C Mash; Eliezer Masliah; Wayne C McCormick; Susan M McCurry; Andrew N McDavid; Ann C McKee; Marsel Mesulam; Bruce L Miller; Carol A Miller; Joshua W Miller; Joseph E Parisi; Daniel P Perl; Elaine Peskind; Ronald C Petersen; Wayne W Poon; Joseph F Quinn; Ruchita A Rajbhandary; Murray Raskind; Barry Reisberg; John M Ringman; Erik D Roberson; Roger N Rosenberg; Mary Sano; Lon S Schneider; William Seeley; Michael L Shelanski; Michael A Slifer; Charles D Smith; Joshua A Sonnen; Salvatore Spina; Robert A Stern; Rudolph E Tanzi; John Q Trojanowski; Juan C Troncoso; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Harry V Vinters; Jean Paul Vonsattel; Sandra Weintraub; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Jennifer Williamson; Randall L Woltjer; Laura B Cantwell; Beth A Dombroski; Duane Beekly; Kathryn L Lunetta; Eden R Martin; M Ilyas Kamboh; Andrew J Saykin; Eric M Reiman; David A Bennett; John C Morris; Thomas J Montine; Alison M Goate; Deborah Blacker; Debby W Tsuang; Hakon Hakonarson; Walter A Kukull; Tatiana M Foroud; Jonathan L Haines; Richard Mayeux; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Lindsay A Farrer; Gerard D Schellenberg Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-04-03 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Manuel Torres; Sebastian Jimenez; Raquel Sanchez-Varo; Victoria Navarro; Laura Trujillo-Estrada; Elisabeth Sanchez-Mejias; Irene Carmona; Jose Carlos Davila; Marisa Vizuete; Antonia Gutierrez; Javier Vitorica Journal: Mol Neurodegener Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 14.195
Authors: Melissa J Landrum; Jennifer M Lee; George R Riley; Wonhee Jang; Wendy S Rubinstein; Deanna M Church; Donna R Maglott Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Jessica E Young; Lauren K Fong; Harald Frankowski; Gregory A Petsko; Scott A Small; Lawrence S B Goldstein Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 7.765
Authors: Christoph Gericke; Anna Mallone; Britta Engelhardt; Roger M Nitsch; Maria Teresa Ferretti Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Rebecca Frankel; Mattias Törnquist; Georg Meisl; Oskar Hansson; Ulf Andreasson; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Birgitta Frohm; Tommy Cedervall; Tuomas P J Knowles; Thom Leiding; Sara Linse Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2019-10-08
Authors: Piotr Gronek; Stefan Balko; Joanna Gronek; Adam Zajac; Adam Maszczyk; Roman Celka; Agnieszka Doberska; Wojciech Czarny; Robert Podstawski; Cain C T Clark; Fang Yu Journal: Aging Dis Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 6.745