| Literature DB >> 28737708 |
Chen-Yuan Chiu1,2, Shih-An Feng3, Shing-Hwa Liu4,5,6, Meng-Tsan Chiang7.
Abstract
The present study investigated and compared the regulatory effects on the lipid-related metabolism and intestinal disaccharidase/fecal bacterial enzyme activities between low molecular weight chitosan and chitosan oligosaccharide in high-fat-diet-fed rats. Diet supplementation of low molecular weight chitosan showed greater efficiency than chitosan oligosaccharide in suppressing the increased weights in body and in liver and adipose tissues of high-fat-diet-fed rats. Supplementation of low molecular weight chitosan also showed a greater improvement than chitosan oligosaccharide in imbalance of plasma, hepatic, and fecal lipid profiles, and intestinal disaccharidase activities in high-fat-diet-fed rats. Moreover, both low molecular weight chitosan and chitosan oligosaccharide significantly decreased the fecal microflora mucinase and β-glucuronidase activities in high-fat-diet-fed rats. These results suggest that low molecular weight chitosan exerts a greater positive improvement than chitosan oligosaccharide in lipid metabolism and intestinal disaccharidase activity in high-fat-diet-induced obese rats.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan oligosaccharide; fecal mucinase; fecal β-glucuronidase; lipid metabolism; low molecular weight chitosan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28737708 PMCID: PMC5532676 DOI: 10.3390/md15070234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Composition of experimental diets (%)
| Ingredient | NC 1 | HF 2 | HF + LC 3 | HF + CO 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lard | - | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Cholesterol | - | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Cholic acid | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Chitosan 5 | - | - | 5 | - |
| Chitosan 6 oligosaccharide | - | - | - | 5 |
| Chow diet | 100 | 89.4 | 84.4 | 84.4 |
1 NC: normal control diet; 2 HF: high fat diet (10% Lard); 3 HF + LC: high fat diet +5% low molecular weight chitosan; 4 HF + CO: high fat diet +5% chitosan oligosaccharide; 5 The average MW and DD of chitosan are about 8 × 104 Dalton and 83.9%, respectively; 6 The average MW and DD of chitosan oligosaccharide are about 719 and 100%, respectively.
The changes of body weight, liver and perirenal fat weight, food intake, feed efficiency in rats fed the different experimental diets for 10 weeks.
| Diet | NC | HF | HF + LC | HF + CO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 158.8 ± 18.4 | 164.3 ± 12.0 | 160.4 ± 11.8 | 162.1 ± 12.6 |
| Final body weight (g) | 476.8 ± 21.2 * | 550.5 ± 51.7 | 489.7 ± 49.5 * | 495.0 ± 51.9 |
| Body weight gain (g) | 318.0 ± 23.0 * | 386.2 ± 43.9 | 329.4 ± 47.7 * | 332.9 ± 56.0 |
| Liver weight (g) | 12.6 ± 0.6 * | 25.5 ± 3.8 | 19.2 ± 3.7 *,# | 23.8 ± 3.4 |
| Relative liver weight | - | - | - | - |
| (g/100 g BW) | 2.6 ± 0.1* | 4.6 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.4 *,# | 4.9 ± 0.9 |
| Perirenal fat (g) | 8.9 ± 2.5* | 14.0 ± 4.7 | 9.9 ± 2.7 * | 9.9 ± 1.9 * |
| Relative perirenal fat weight | - | - | - | - |
| (g/100 g BW) | 1.85 ± 0.5 * | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.5 * | 2.0 ± 0.3 * |
| Food intake (g/day) | 30.2 ± 3.1 | 28.6 ± 3.4 | 27.5 ± 4.7 | 28.3 ± 3.4 |
| Feed efficiency (%) | 7.3 ± 0.8 * | 9.1 ± 1.2 | 7.8 ± 1.0 * | 8.2 ± 1.5 |
Feed efficiency = (weight gain (g)/food intake (g)) × 100%; Results are expressed as mean ±S.D. for each group rats (n = 8); * p< 0.05 versus HF; # p < 0.05 versus HF + CO.
The change of plasma lipid concentrations in rats fed the different experimental diet for 10 weeks.
| Diet | NC | HF | HF + LC | HF + CO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 52.5 ± 8.3 * | 116.9 ± 50.5 | 73.6 ± 14.9 * | 77.2 ± 24.8 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 30.6 ± 1.8 * | 21.5 ± 11.7 | 18.2 ± 8.8 | 13.3 ± 3.6 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 16.3 ± 6.4 * | 36.6 ± 13.6 | 28.0 ± 8.5 | 32.1 ± 17.2 |
| VLDL-C (mg/dL) | 5.6 ± 2.8 * | 58.8 ± 43.8 | 27.4 ± 12.2 * | 31.8 ± 9.9 |
| LDL-C + VLDL-C | 21.9 ± 7.5 * | 95.4 ± 49.0 | 55.4 ± 17.4 * | 63.9 ± 26.5 |
| TC/HDL-C ratio | 1.7 ± 0.2 * | 6.7 ± 5.5 | 5.1 ± 3.2 | 6.3 ± 3.1 |
| HDL-C/(LDL-C + VLDL-C) ratio | 1.6 ± 0.7 * | 0.27 ± 0.2 | 0.38 ± 0.3 | 0.25 ± 0.1 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 46.2 ± 19.1 | 36.3 ± 7.9 | 29.4 ± 7.7 | 25.2 ± 6.6 * |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 18.5 ± 1.5 * | 24.7 ± 1.8 | 11.4 ± 4.9 *,# | 25.8 ± 17.0 |
Results are expressed as mean ±S.D. for each group rats (n = 8); * p < 0.05 versus HF; # p < 0.05 versus HF + CO.
The change of hepatic lipid profile and enzyme activity of lipid biosynthesis in rats fed the different experimental diets for 10 weeks.
| Diet | NC | HF | HF + LC | HF + CO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol | - | - | - | - |
| (mg/g liver) | 1.5 ± 0.41 * | 63.1 ± 10.8 | 34.7 ± 15.5 *,# | 67.7 ± 19.4 |
| (g/liver) | 0.02 ± 0.01 * | 1.60 ± 0.37 | 0.66 ± 0.30 *,# | 1.60 ± 0.57 |
| Triglyceride | - | - | - | - |
| (mg/g liver) | 9.8 ± 2.2 * | 47.2 ± 15.9 | 38.8 ± 11.1 | 38.6 ± 15.9 |
| (g/liver) | 0.12 ± 0.03 * | 1.20 ± 0.46 | 0.76 ± 0.31 * | 0.93 ± 0.48 |
| Fatty acid synthetase | 2.5 ± 2.0 | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 0.9 * | 2.2 ± 1.1 * |
| (nmole NADPH/min/mg protein) |
Results are expressed as mean ±S.D. for each group rats (n = 8); * p < 0.05 versus HF; # p < 0.05 versus HF + CO.
The change of fecal weight, triglyceride, and total cholesterol concentration in rats fed the different experimental diets for 10 weeks.
| Diet | NC | HF | HF + LC | HF + CO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feces wet weight (g/day) | 9.7 ± 1.7 | 8.5 ± 2.3 | 10.7 ± 1.8 * | 9.9 ± 1.7 |
| Feces dry weight (g/day) | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 5.7 ± 1.1 | 6.2 ± 0.6 | 5.9 ± 0.8 |
| Total cholesterol | - | - | - | - |
| (mg/g feces) | 6.6 ± 1.5 * | 12.8 ± 3.1 | 15.5 ± 1.7 *,# | 12.9 ± 2.5 |
| (mg/day) | 40.6 ± 11.3 * | 71.0 ± 23.4 | 96.5 ± 12.6 * | 77.3 ± 22.0 |
| Triglyceride | - | - | - | - |
| (mg/g feces) | 12.2 ± 1.2 | 12.8 ± 0.9 | 13.1 ± 0.9 | 13.6 ± 1.2 |
| (mg/day) | 75.6 ± 13.3 | 69.6 ± 11.9 | 81.8 ± 10.9 * | 80.8 ± 14.9 |
Results are expressed as mean ±S.D. for each group rats (n = 8); * p < 0.05 versus HF; # p < 0.05 versus HF + CO.
The change of intestinal disaccharidase activities and fecal mucinase and β-glucuronidase activities in rats fed the different experimental diets for 10 weeks.
| Diet | NC | HF | HF + LC | HF + CO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maltase (mg glucose/min/mg protein) | 774.7 ± 124.4 * | 986.8 ± 73.2 | 837.6 ± 128.6 *,# | 990.2 ± 30.9 |
| Lactase (mg glucose/min/mg protein) | 152.2 ± 50.7 * | 205.1 ± 31.6 | 163.5 ± 41.9 * | 184.7 ± 18.4 |
| Sucrase (mg glucose/min/mg protein) | 217.6 ± 66.4 * | 329.3 ± 62.2 | 228.2 ± 103.6 * | 266.2 ± 59.4 |
| Mucinase (nmole reducing sugar/min/mg protein) | 3.6 ± 0.9 * | 4.9 ± 1.0 | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 3.1 ± 0.6 * |
| β-glucuronidase (nmole phenolphthalein/min/mg protein) | 2.4 ± 0.4 * | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.7 * | 2.5 ± 0.2 * |
Results are expressed as mean ±S.D. for each group rats (n = 8); * p < 0.05 versus HF; # p < 0.05 versus HF + CO.
Figure 1Scheme representing the functional comparison for lipid metabolism and intestinal/fecal enzyme activities between low molecular weight chitosan (LC) and chitosan oligosaccharide (CO) in high-fat (HF)-diet-fed rats. There are the different anti-obesity effects between 5% LC and 5% CO supplementations in HF-diet-fed rats for 10 weeks. LC has relatively greater ability than CO to positively regulate lipid metabolism and intestinal disaccharidase activities in HF-diet-induced obese rats.