| Literature DB >> 29163454 |
Ting Yu1,2, Yu Wang1,3, Shicheng Chen4, Min Hu5, Zhiling Wang1, Guozhong Wu6, Xianyong Ma1, Zhuang Chen2, Chuntian Zheng1.
Abstract
Low-molecular-weight chitosan (LC) promoted growth in weaned piglets as an alternative to feed-grade antibiotics. To investigate the influence of LC supplementation on piglets' gut microbiome and compare the differences in community composition between LC and antibiotics with ZnO addition, we assessed the cecal microbial community by 16S rRNA gene sequencing with three treatments consisting of basal diet (CTR group), basal diet with low-molecular-weight chitosan (LC group), and basal diet with antibiotic and ZnO (AZ group). LC decreased pH more than AZ did in the cecum (both compared to CTR). Beta diversity analysis showed that community structure was distinctly different among the CTR, LC, and AZ treatments, indicating that either LC or AZ treatment modulated the piglet microbiota. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria dominated the community [>98% of operational taxonomic units (OTUs)] in piglet cecal contents. Compared to CTR, both LC, and AZ increased the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes while they decreased the count of Firmicutes and AZ decreased the population of Proteobacteria. In CTR the top four abundant genera were Prevotella (~10.4%), Succinivibrio (~6.2%), Lactobacillus (~5.6%), and Anaerovibrio (5.4%). Both LC and AZ increased the relative abundance of Prevotella but decreased the ratio of Lactobacillus when they compared with CTR. Moreover, LC increased the relative abundance of Succinivibrio and Anaerovibrio while AZ decreased them. The microbial function prediction showed LC enriched more pathways in the metabolism of cofactors and vitamins than CTR or AZ did. LC may potentially function as an alternative to feed-grade antibiotics in weaned piglets due to its beneficial regulation of the intestinal microbiome.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rDNA sequencing; cecal microflora; low-molecular-weight chitosan; microbial community; weaned piglets
Year: 2017 PMID: 29163454 PMCID: PMC5682002 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Microbial composition, alpha, and beta-diversity comparison among CTR, AZ and LC groups. (A) Comparison of OTUs in the three groups. A Venn diagram was generated to describe the common and unique OTUs among the three groups. (B) Bacterial diversity comparison (PD index). LC group (n = 5) and AZ group (n = 5) both significantly decreased the cecal bacterial diversity (P < 0.05). (C) Bacterial richness comparison (Observed species index). AZ group significantly decreased the cecal bacterial richness (P < 0.05). (D) Bacterial richness (Chao index). AZ group significantly decreased the cecal bacterial richness (P < 0.05). (E) The microbial community structure comparison. The NMDS indicated that it was distinctly different in distribution of microbiota at each group. (F) Characterization of communities at the phylum level. Relative abundance of microbial phyla in the ceca of piglets fed the low-molecular-weight chitosan (LC) or antibiotics and ZnO (AZ) diets. (G) The significant difference of phyla. Three predominant phyla of Bacteroidetes, Fimicutes, and Proteobacteria were affected in LC and AZ groups. (H) The significant differences of genera. The relative abundance of Prevotella were increased by LC or AZ supplementation. Asterisk (*) indicates the significant differences between two groups at P < 0.05.
Pseudo F table of PERMANOVA analysis based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities.
| Groups | 2 | 2.813 | 0.319 | |
| LC vs. CTR | 3.157 | 0.283 | 0.009 | |
| AZ vs. CTR | 2.689 | 0.252 | 0.009 | |
| LC vs. AZ | 2.597 | 0.245 | 0.031 | 0.093 |
Based on genus level and n = 5 per group.
Significant P-values (< 0.05) are bolded.
Figure 2Comparison of microbial function prediction. PICRUSt-predicted relative abundance of KEGG pathway (KEGG level 2) was compared among LC, AZ, and CTR groups. (A) the difference of the predicted function between LC and CTR; (B) the difference of the predicted function between AZ and CTR; (C) the difference of the predicted function between LC and AZ. Statistical analysis was conducted using a Welch's t-test between two groups; a significant difference of KEGG pathways (P.adj < 0.05) was displayed.
Figure 3Different KO terms in Prevotella. The abundance of enrichments was shown: Translation (18%), Carbohydrate metabolism (15%), Nucleotide metabolism (10%), Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins (9%), Energy metabolism (8%), Amino acid metabolism (7%), Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism (6%).
Figure 4Seventy-nine different KO terms. The relative abundance greater than 0.1% in any group was shown.