Carmen M Cirstea1, Phil Lee, Sorin C Craciunas, In-Young Choi, Joseph E Burris, Randolph J Nudo. 1. From the Departments of Neurology (CMC, I-YC), Molecular & Integrative Physiology (PL), Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (RJN); Hoglund Brain Imaging Center (CMC, PL, SCC, I-YC), Landon Center on Aging (RJN), University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas; and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri (CMC, JEB).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine whether neural state of spared motor and premotor cortices captured before a therapy predicts therapy-related motor gains in chronic subcortical stroke. DESIGN: Ten survivors, presenting chronic moderate upper limb impairment, underwent proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, and kinematics assessments before a 4-wk impairment-oriented training. Clinical/kinematics assessments were repeated after therapy, and motor gain was defined as positive values of clinical upper limb/elbow motion changes and negative values of trunk motion changes. Candidate predictors were N-acetylaspartate-neuronal marker, glutamate-glutamine-indicator of glutamatergic neurotransmission, and myo-inositol-glial marker, measured bilaterally within the upper limb territory in motor and premotor (premotor cortex, supplementary motor area) cortices. Traditional predictors (age, stroke length, pre-therapy upper limb clinical impairment, infarct volume) were also investigated. RESULTS: Poor motor gain was associated with lower glutamate-glutamine levels in ipsilesional primary motor cortex and premotor cortex (r = 0.77, P = 0.01 and r = 0.78, P = 0.008, respectively), lower N-acetylaspartate in ipsilesional premotor cortex (r = 0.69, P = 0.02), higher glutamate-glutamine in contralesional primary motor cortex (r = -0.68, P = 0.03), and lower glutamate-glutamine in contralesional supplementary motor area (r = 0.64, P = 0.04). These predictors outperformed myo-inositol metrics and traditional predictors (P ≈ 0.05-1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Glutamatergic state of bilateral motor and premotor cortices and neuronal state of ipsilesional premotor cortex may be important for predicting motor outcome in the context of a restorative therapy.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine whether neural state of spared motor and premotor cortices captured before a therapy predicts therapy-related motor gains in chronic subcortical stroke. DESIGN: Ten survivors, presenting chronic moderate upper limb impairment, underwent proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, and kinematics assessments before a 4-wk impairment-oriented training. Clinical/kinematics assessments were repeated after therapy, and motor gain was defined as positive values of clinical upper limb/elbow motion changes and negative values of trunk motion changes. Candidate predictors were N-acetylaspartate-neuronal marker, glutamate-glutamine-indicator of glutamatergic neurotransmission, and myo-inositol-glial marker, measured bilaterally within the upper limb territory in motor and premotor (premotor cortex, supplementary motor area) cortices. Traditional predictors (age, stroke length, pre-therapy upper limb clinical impairment, infarct volume) were also investigated. RESULTS: Poor motor gain was associated with lower glutamate-glutamine levels in ipsilesional primary motor cortex and premotor cortex (r = 0.77, P = 0.01 and r = 0.78, P = 0.008, respectively), lower N-acetylaspartate in ipsilesional premotor cortex (r = 0.69, P = 0.02), higher glutamate-glutamine in contralesional primary motor cortex (r = -0.68, P = 0.03), and lower glutamate-glutamine in contralesional supplementary motor area (r = 0.64, P = 0.04). These predictors outperformed myo-inositol metrics and traditional predictors (P ≈ 0.05-1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Glutamatergic state of bilateral motor and premotor cortices and neuronal state of ipsilesional premotor cortex may be important for predicting motor outcome in the context of a restorative therapy.
Authors: Sorin C Craciunas; William M Brooks; Randolph J Nudo; Elena A Popescu; In-Young Choi; Phil Lee; Hung-Wen Yeh; Cary R Savage; Carmen M Cirstea Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Carmen M Cirstea; Cary R Savage; Randolph J Nudo; Leonardo G Cohen; Hung-Wen Yeh; In-Young Choi; Phil Lee; Sorin C Craciunas; Elena A Popescu; Ali Bani-Ahmed; William M Brooks Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Alexander A Brown; Bradley J Ferguson; Vovanti Jones; Bruce E Green; Justin D Pearre; Ifeoma A Anunoby; David Q Beversdorf; Richard J Barohn; Carmen M Cirstea Journal: Front Artif Intell Date: 2022-07-07
Authors: Jennapher Lingo VanGilder; Cielita Lopez-Lennon; Serene S Paul; Leland E Dibble; Kevin Duff; Sydney Y Schaefer Journal: Front Rehabil Sci Date: 2021-10-22
Authors: Jennapher Lingo VanGilder; Maurizio Bergamino; Andrew Hooyman; Megan C Fitzhugh; Corianne Rogalsky; Jill C Stewart; Scott C Beeman; Sydney Y Schaefer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 3.752