Literature DB >> 28735622

Modeling RNA Secondary Structure with Sequence Comparison and Experimental Mapping Data.

Zhen Tan1, Gaurav Sharma2, David H Mathews3.   

Abstract

Secondary structure prediction is an important problem in RNA bioinformatics because knowledge of structure is critical to understanding the functions of RNA sequences. Significant improvements in prediction accuracy have recently been demonstrated though the incorporation of experimentally obtained structural information, for instance using selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) mapping. However, such mapping data is currently available only for a limited number of RNA sequences. In this article, we present a method for extending the benefit of experimental mapping data in secondary structure prediction to homologous sequences. Specifically, we propose a method for integrating experimental mapping data into a comparative sequence analysis algorithm for secondary structure prediction of multiple homologs, whereby the mapping data benefits not only the prediction for the specific sequence that was mapped but also other homologs. The proposed method is realized by modifying the TurboFold II algorithm for prediction of RNA secondary structures to utilize basepairing probabilities guided by SHAPE experimental data when such data are available. The SHAPE-mapping-guided basepairing probabilities are obtained using the RSample method. Results demonstrate that the SHAPE mapping data for a sequence improves structure prediction accuracy of other homologous sequences beyond the accuracy obtained by sequence comparison alone (TurboFold II). The updated version of TurboFold II is freely available as part of the RNAstructure software package.
Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28735622      PMCID: PMC5529333          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  52 in total

1.  Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for the formation of RNA duplexes with single nucleotide bulges.

Authors:  Brent M Znosko; Sara B Silvestri; Heather Volkman; Bob Boswell; Martin J Serra
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  The accuracy of ribosomal RNA comparative structure models.

Authors:  Robin R Gutell; Jung C Lee; Jamie J Cannone
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  ProbCons: Probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  Chuong B Do; Mahathi S P Mahabhashyam; Michael Brudno; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  CONTRAfold: RNA secondary structure prediction without physics-based models.

Authors:  Chuong B Do; Daniel A Woods; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Energy-directed RNA structure prediction.

Authors:  Ivo L Hofacker
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

6.  SeqFold: genome-scale reconstruction of RNA secondary structure integrating high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Zhengqing Ouyang; Michael P Snyder; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  TurboFold: iterative probabilistic estimation of secondary structures for multiple RNA sequences.

Authors:  Arif O Harmanci; Gaurav Sharma; David H Mathews
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Rfam 12.0: updates to the RNA families database.

Authors:  Eric P Nawrocki; Sarah W Burge; Alex Bateman; Jennifer Daub; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Sean R Eddy; Evan W Floden; Paul P Gardner; Thomas A Jones; John Tate; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 19.160

9.  Model-Free RNA Sequence and Structure Alignment Informed by SHAPE Probing Reveals a Conserved Alternate Secondary Structure for 16S rRNA.

Authors:  Christopher A Lavender; Ronny Lorenz; Ge Zhang; Rita Tamayo; Ivo L Hofacker; Kevin M Weeks
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo.

Authors:  Silvi Rouskin; Meghan Zubradt; Stefan Washietl; Manolis Kellis; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  How to benchmark RNA secondary structure prediction accuracy.

Authors:  David H Mathews
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Computationally reconstructing cotranscriptional RNA folding from experimental data reveals rearrangement of non-native folding intermediates.

Authors:  Angela M Yu; Paul M Gasper; Luyi Cheng; Lien B Lai; Simi Kaur; Venkat Gopalan; Alan A Chen; Julius B Lucks
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal an Interplay between SHAPE Reagent Binding and RNA Flexibility.

Authors:  Vojtěch Mlýnský; Giovanni Bussi
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 6.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.