Literature DB >> 12127448

The accuracy of ribosomal RNA comparative structure models.

Robin R Gutell1, Jung C Lee, Jamie J Cannone.   

Abstract

The determination of the 16S and 23S rRNA secondary structure models was initiated shortly after the first complete 16S and 23S rRNA sequences were determined in the late 1970s. The structures that are common to all 16S rRNAs and all 23S rRNAs were determined using comparative methods from the analysis of thousands of rRNA sequences. Twenty-plus years later, the 16S and 23S rRNA comparative structure models have been evaluated against the recently determined high-resolution crystal structures of the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits. Nearly all of the predicted covariation-based base pairs, including the regular base pairs and helices, and the irregular base pairs and tertiary interactions, were present in the 30S and 50S crystal structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12127448     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00339-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  136 in total

1.  Structural rRNA characters support monophyly of raptorial limbs and paraphyly of limb specialization in water fleas.

Authors:  Timothy D Swain; Derek J Taylor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Using an RNA secondary structure partition function to determine confidence in base pairs predicted by free energy minimization.

Authors:  David H Mathews
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Probing complex RNA structures by mechanical force.

Authors:  S Harlepp; T Marchal; J Robert; J-F Léger; A Xayaphoummine; H Isambert; D Chatenay
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  On the page number of RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots.

Authors:  Peter Clote; Stefan Dobrev; Ivan Dotu; Evangelos Kranakis; Danny Krizanc; Jorge Urrutia
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  TurboKnot: rapid prediction of conserved RNA secondary structures including pseudoknots.

Authors:  Matthew G Seetin; David H Mathews
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Expected distance between terminal nucleotides of RNA secondary structures.

Authors:  Peter Clote; Yann Ponty; Jean-Marc Steyaert
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 7.  Folding and finding RNA secondary structure.

Authors:  David H Mathews; Walter N Moss; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  ProbKnot: fast prediction of RNA secondary structure including pseudoknots.

Authors:  Stanislav Bellaousov; David H Mathews
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  rCAD: A Novel Database Schema for the Comparative Analysis of RNA.

Authors:  Stuart Ozer; Kishore J Doshi; Weijia Xu; Robin R Gutell
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Escience       Date:  2011-12-31

10.  Saccharomyces SRP RNA secondary structures: a conserved S-domain and extended Alu-domain.

Authors:  Rob W Van Nues; Jeremy D Brown
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.