Literature DB >> 28735130

Bony Lateral Recess Stenosis and Other Radiographic Predictors of Failed Indirect Decompression via Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion: Multi-Institutional Analysis of 101 Consecutive Spinal Levels.

Timothy Y Wang1, Gautam Nayar1, Christopher R Brown2, Luiz Pimenta3, Isaac O Karikari1, Robert E Isaacs4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) largely provides successful indirect decompression, some patients have recurrent same-level pain and functional disability. Identifying risk factors for this failure would facilitate better patient selection and improve outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative radiographic risk factors for failure of XLIF.
METHODS: Patients undergoing XLIF were prospectively enrolled by 3 surgeons at 3 separate institutions. Radiographic variables measured included (1) anterior and posterior disc height, (2) foramen height and area, (3) central canal diameter, (4) central canal area, (5) right and left subarticular diameters, (6) facet arthropathy grade, and (7) presence of bony lateral recess stenosis. Patients failed indirect decompression if Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores did not improve by 20 points or revision surgery was required within 6 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify radiographic predictors of failure of indirect decompression.
RESULTS: Of the 45 patients (age 65.6 ± 10.5 years; 14 male) involving 101 spinal levels included in this study, 13 (29%) failed indirect decompression. From univariate analysis, these patients had significantly smaller central canal diameter, foraminal height, and disc height (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis of these parameters and those trending toward significance, bony lateral recess stenosis was the only significant independent predictor for failure of indirect decompression (coefficient, 0.55 [0.24-0.85]; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Bony lateral recess stenosis is an independent predictor for failure to achieve adequate spinal decompression via XLIF and thus may benefit from undergoing direct decompression.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indirect decompression; Lateral access; Lateral recess stenosis; Patient selection; Radiographic predictors; Risk factors; XLIF

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28735130     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  15 in total

1.  Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Wicharn Yingsakmongkol; Khanathip Jitpakdee; Stephen Kerr; Worawat Limthongkul; Vit Kotheeranurak; Weerasak Singhatanadgige
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-08-10

2.  Anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and patient-related considerations for ALIF, anterior-to-psoas, and transpsoas LLIF approaches.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Kimberly Ashayeri; Carlos Leon; Ivan Cheng; J Alex Thomas; Brett Braly; Brian Kwon; Leon Eisen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Quantitative analysis of indirect decompression in extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior spinal fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nomura; Akihisa Yamashita; Tetsuya Watanabe; Kenzo Shirasawa
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

Review 4.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

5.  Indirect Decompression Failure After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Reported Failures and Predictive Factors: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sertac Kirnaz; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Jiaao Gu; Christoph Wipplinger; Ibrahim Hussain; Joshua Adjei; Eliana Kim; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Taylor Wong; Robert Nick Hernandez; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  Dynamic Posture-Related Preoperative Pain as a Single Clinical Criterion in Patient Selection for Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Without Direct Decompression.

Authors:  Kai-Zheong Lim; Christopher Daly; Jessica Brown; Tony Goldschlager
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-11-15

7.  Radiographic and clinical outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jun Li; Hao Li; Ning Zhang; Zhi-Wei Wang; Teng-Fei Zhao; Lin-Wei Chen; Gang Chen; Qi-Xin Chen; Fang-Cai Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF): An Update.

Authors:  Oded Rabau; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Mina Aziz; Alisson Teles; Susan Mengxiao Ge; Javier Quillo-Olvera; Jean Ouellet
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Analysis of Temporal Changes in Dural Sac Morphology After XLIF Indirect Decompression.

Authors:  Yutaka Kono; Hogaku Gen; Yoshio Sakuma
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-07

10.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in a consecutive series of 72 patients.

Authors:  Mirza Pojskic; Benjamin Saβ; Benjamin Völlger; Christopher Nimsky; Barbara Carl
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.