Madeline H Meier1, Avshalom Caspi2,3,4, Andrea Danese4,5,6, Helen L Fisher4, Renate Houts2,3, Louise Arseneault4, Terrie E Moffitt2,3,4. 1. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. 2. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Medical Research Council Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK. 5. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK. 6. National and Specialist Service Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: This study tested whether adolescents who used cannabis or met criteria for cannabis dependence showed neuropsychological impairment prior to cannabis initiation and neuropsychological decline from before to after cannabis initiation. DESIGN: A longitudinal co-twin control study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 1989 twins from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a nationally representative birth cohort of twins born in England and Wales from 1994 to 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of cannabis use and cannabis dependence were assessed at age 18. Intelligence quotient (IQ) was obtained at ages 5, 12 and 18. Executive functions were assessed at age 18. FINDINGS: Compared with adolescents who did not use cannabis, adolescents who used cannabis had lower IQ in childhood prior to cannabis initiation and lower IQ at age 18, but there was little evidence that cannabis use was associated with IQ decline from ages 12-18. For example, adolescents with cannabis dependence had age 12 and age 18 IQ scores that were 5.61 (t = -3.11, P = 0.002) and 7.34 IQ points (t = -5.27, P < 0.001) lower than adolescents without cannabis dependence, but adolescents with cannabis dependence did not show greater IQ decline from age 12-18 (t = -1.27, P = 0.20). Moreover, adolescents who used cannabis had poorer executive functions at age 18 than adolescents who did not use cannabis, but these associations were generally not apparent within twin pairs. For example, twins who used cannabis more frequently than their co-twin performed similarly to their co-twin on five of six executive function tests (Ps > 0.10). The one exception was that twins who used cannabis more frequently than their co-twin performed worse on one working memory test (Spatial Span reversed; β = -0.07, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term cannabis use in adolescence does not appear to cause IQ decline or impair executive functions, even when cannabis use reaches the level of dependence. Family background factors explain why adolescent cannabis users perform worse on IQ and executive function tests.
AIMS: This study tested whether adolescents who used cannabis or met criteria for cannabis dependence showed neuropsychological impairment prior to cannabis initiation and neuropsychological decline from before to after cannabis initiation. DESIGN: A longitudinal co-twin control study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 1989 twins from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a nationally representative birth cohort of twins born in England and Wales from 1994 to 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of cannabis use and cannabis dependence were assessed at age 18. Intelligence quotient (IQ) was obtained at ages 5, 12 and 18. Executive functions were assessed at age 18. FINDINGS: Compared with adolescents who did not use cannabis, adolescents who used cannabis had lower IQ in childhood prior to cannabis initiation and lower IQ at age 18, but there was little evidence that cannabis use was associated with IQ decline from ages 12-18. For example, adolescents with cannabis dependence had age 12 and age 18 IQ scores that were 5.61 (t = -3.11, P = 0.002) and 7.34 IQ points (t = -5.27, P < 0.001) lower than adolescents without cannabis dependence, but adolescents with cannabis dependence did not show greater IQ decline from age 12-18 (t = -1.27, P = 0.20). Moreover, adolescents who used cannabis had poorer executive functions at age 18 than adolescents who did not use cannabis, but these associations were generally not apparent within twin pairs. For example, twins who used cannabis more frequently than their co-twin performed similarly to their co-twin on five of six executive function tests (Ps > 0.10). The one exception was that twins who used cannabis more frequently than their co-twin performed worse on one working memory test (Spatial Span reversed; β = -0.07, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term cannabis use in adolescence does not appear to cause IQ decline or impair executive functions, even when cannabis use reaches the level of dependence. Family background factors explain why adolescent cannabis users perform worse on IQ and executive function tests.
Authors: Madeline H Meier; Avshalom Caspi; Antony Ambler; HonaLee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richard S E Keefe; Kay McDonald; Aimee Ward; Richie Poulton; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicholas J Jackson; Joshua D Isen; Rubin Khoddam; Daniel Irons; Catherine Tuvblad; William G Iacono; Matt McGue; Adrian Raine; Laura A Baker Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Reto Auer; Eric Vittinghoff; Kristine Yaffe; Arnaud Künzi; Stefan G Kertesz; Deborah A Levine; Emiliano Albanese; Rachel A Whitmer; David R Jacobs; Stephen Sidney; M Maria Glymour; Mark J Pletcher Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 44.409
Authors: Jonathan D Schaefer; Nayla R Hamdi; Stephen M Malone; Scott Vrieze; Sylia Wilson; Matt McGue; William G Iacono Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jarrod M Ellingson; J Megan Ross; Evan Winiger; Michael C Stallings; Robin P Corley; Naomi P Friedman; John K Hewitt; Susan F Tapert; Sandra A Brown; Tamara L Wall; Christian J Hopfer Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Shadiya L Moss; Julian Santaella-Tenorio; Pia M Mauro; Katherine M Keyes; Silvia S Martins Journal: Addiction Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 6.526