BACKGROUND: Children growing up in poor versus affluent neighborhoods are more likely to spend time in prison, develop health problems and die at an early age. The question of how neighborhood conditions influence our behavior and health has attracted the attention of public health officials and scholars for generations. Online tools are now providing new opportunities to measure neighborhood features and may provide a cost effective way to advance our understanding of neighborhood effects on child health. METHOD: A virtual systematic social observation (SSO) study was conducted to test whether Google Street View could be used to reliably capture the neighborhood conditions of families participating in the Environmental-Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study. Multiple raters coded a subsample of 120 neighborhoods and convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated on the full sample of over 1,000 neighborhoods by linking virtual SSO measures to: (a) consumer based geo-demographic classifications of deprivation and health, (b) local resident surveys of disorder and safety, and (c) parent and teacher assessments of children's antisocial behavior, prosocial behavior, and body mass index. RESULTS: High levels of observed agreement were documented for signs of physical disorder, physical decay, dangerousness and street safety. Inter-rater agreement estimates fell within the moderate to substantial range for all of the scales (ICCs ranged from .48 to .91). Negative neighborhood features, including SSO-rated disorder and decay and dangerousness corresponded with local resident reports, demonstrated a graded relationship with census-defined indices of socioeconomic status, and predicted higher levels of antisocial behavior among local children. In addition, positive neighborhood features, including SSO-rated street safety and the percentage of green space, were associated with higher prosocial behavior and healthy weight status among children. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of Google Street View as a reliable and cost effective tool for measuring both negative and positive features of local neighborhoods.
BACKGROUND: Children growing up in poor versus affluent neighborhoods are more likely to spend time in prison, develop health problems and die at an early age. The question of how neighborhood conditions influence our behavior and health has attracted the attention of public health officials and scholars for generations. Online tools are now providing new opportunities to measure neighborhood features and may provide a cost effective way to advance our understanding of neighborhood effects on child health. METHOD: A virtual systematic social observation (SSO) study was conducted to test whether Google Street View could be used to reliably capture the neighborhood conditions of families participating in the Environmental-Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study. Multiple raters coded a subsample of 120 neighborhoods and convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated on the full sample of over 1,000 neighborhoods by linking virtual SSO measures to: (a) consumer based geo-demographic classifications of deprivation and health, (b) local resident surveys of disorder and safety, and (c) parent and teacher assessments of children's antisocial behavior, prosocial behavior, and body mass index. RESULTS: High levels of observed agreement were documented for signs of physical disorder, physical decay, dangerousness and street safety. Inter-rater agreement estimates fell within the moderate to substantial range for all of the scales (ICCs ranged from .48 to .91). Negative neighborhood features, including SSO-rated disorder and decay and dangerousness corresponded with local resident reports, demonstrated a graded relationship with census-defined indices of socioeconomic status, and predicted higher levels of antisocial behavior among local children. In addition, positive neighborhood features, including SSO-rated street safety and the percentage of green space, were associated with higher prosocial behavior and healthy weight status among children. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of Google Street View as a reliable and cost effective tool for measuring both negative and positive features of local neighborhoods.
Authors: Andrew G Rundle; Michael D M Bader; Catherine A Richards; Kathryn M Neckerman; Julien O Teitler Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Philippa Clarke; Jennifer Ailshire; Robert Melendez; Michael Bader; Jeffrey Morenoff Journal: Health Place Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Candice L Odgers; Terrie E Moffitt; Laura M Tach; Alan Sampson; Robert J Taylor; Charlotte L Matthews; Avshalom Caspi Journal: Dev Psychol Date: 2009-07
Authors: Andrew P Jones; Emma G Coombes; Simon J Griffin; Esther Mf van Sluijs Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Stephen J Mooney; Charles J DiMaggio; Gina S Lovasi; Kathryn M Neckerman; Michael D M Bader; Julien O Teitler; Daniel M Sheehan; Darby W Jack; Andrew G Rundle Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Daniel W Belsky; Avshalom Caspi; Louise Arseneault; David L Corcoran; Benjamin W Domingue; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Renate M Houts; Jonathan S Mill; Terrie E Moffitt; Joseph Prinz; Karen Sugden; Jasmin Wertz; Benjamin Williams; Candice L Odgers Journal: Nat Hum Behav Date: 2019-04-08
Authors: Antonella Trotta; Louise Arseneault; Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E Moffitt; Andrea Danese; Carmine Pariante; Helen L Fisher Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Madeline H Meier; Avshalom Caspi; Andrea Danese; Helen L Fisher; Renate Houts; Louise Arseneault; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: Addiction Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Richard V Remigio; Garazi Zulaika; Renata S Rabello; John Bryan; Daniel M Sheehan; Sandro Galea; Marilia S Carvalho; Andrew Rundle; Gina S Lovasi Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Andres De Los Reyes; Tara M Augenstein; Mo Wang; Sarah A Thomas; Deborah A G Drabick; Darcy E Burgers; Jill Rabinowitz Journal: Psychol Bull Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 17.737
Authors: Erin C Dunn; Katherine E Masyn; Monica Yudron; Stephanie M Jones; S V Subramanian Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 4.328