Literature DB >> 28733404

High-Throughput Quantitative Genetic Interaction Mapping in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Assen Roguev1, Colm J Ryan2, Edgar Hartsuiker3, Nevan J Krogan1.   

Abstract

Epistasis mapping, in which the phenotype that emerges from combining pairs of mutations is measured quantitatively, is a powerful tool for unbiased study of gene function. When performed at a large scale, this approach has been used to assign function to previously uncharacterized genes, define functional modules and pathways, and study their cross talk. These experiments rely heavily on methods for rapid sampling of binary combinations of mutant alleles by systematic generation of a series of double mutants. Epistasis mapping technologies now exist in various model systems. Here we provide an overview of different epistasis mapping technologies, including the pombe epistasis mapper (PEM) system designed for the collection of quantitative genetic interaction data in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Comprising a series of high-throughput selection steps for generation and characterization of double mutants, the PEM system has provided insight into a wide range of biological processes as well as facilitated evolutionary analysis of genetic interactomes across different species.
© 2018 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28733404      PMCID: PMC6764749          DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top079905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc        ISSN: 1559-6095


  61 in total

Review 1.  Principles for the buffering of genetic variation.

Authors:  J L Hartman; B Garvik; L Hartwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network.

Authors:  Amy Hin Yan Tong; Guillaume Lesage; Gary D Bader; Huiming Ding; Hong Xu; Xiaofeng Xin; James Young; Gabriel F Berriz; Renee L Brost; Michael Chang; YiQun Chen; Xin Cheng; Gordon Chua; Helena Friesen; Debra S Goldberg; Jennifer Haynes; Christine Humphries; Grace He; Shamiza Hussein; Lizhu Ke; Nevan Krogan; Zhijian Li; Joshua N Levinson; Hong Lu; Patrice Ménard; Christella Munyana; Ainslie B Parsons; Owen Ryan; Raffi Tonikian; Tania Roberts; Anne-Marie Sdicu; Jesse Shapiro; Bilal Sheikh; Bernhard Suter; Sharyl L Wong; Lan V Zhang; Hongwei Zhu; Christopher G Burd; Sean Munro; Chris Sander; Jasper Rine; Jack Greenblatt; Matthias Peter; Anthony Bretscher; Graham Bell; Frederick P Roth; Grant W Brown; Brenda Andrews; Howard Bussey; Charles Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Michael-Christopher Keogh; Jung-Ae Kim; Michael Downey; Jeffrey Fillingham; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Jacob C Harrison; Megumi Onishi; Nira Datta; Sarah Galicia; Andrew Emili; Judy Lieberman; Xuetong Shen; Stephen Buratowski; James E Haber; Daniel Durocher; Jack F Greenblatt; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile.

Authors:  Maya Schuldiner; Sean R Collins; Natalie J Thompson; Vladimir Denic; Arunashree Bhamidipati; Thanuja Punna; Jan Ihmels; Brenda Andrews; Charles Boone; Jack F Greenblatt; Jonathan S Weissman; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants.

Authors:  A H Tong; M Evangelista; A B Parsons; H Xu; G D Bader; N Pagé; M Robinson; S Raghibizadeh; C W Hogue; H Bussey; B Andrews; M Tyers; C Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Cotranscriptional set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 recruits a repressive Rpd3 complex.

Authors:  Michael-Christopher Keogh; Siavash K Kurdistani; Stephanie A Morris; Seong Hoon Ahn; Vladimir Podolny; Sean R Collins; Maya Schuldiner; Kayu Chin; Thanuja Punna; Natalie J Thompson; Charles Boone; Andrew Emili; Jonathan S Weissman; Timothy R Hughes; Brian D Strahl; Michael Grunstein; Jack F Greenblatt; Stephen Buratowski; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome.

Authors:  Xuewen Pan; Daniel S Yuan; Dong Xiang; Xiaoling Wang; Sharon Sookhai-Mahadeo; Joel S Bader; Philip Hieter; Forrest Spencer; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks.

Authors:  Ryan Kelley; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data.

Authors:  Sean R Collins; Maya Schuldiner; Nevan J Krogan; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Gene function prediction from congruent synthetic lethal interactions in yeast.

Authors:  Ping Ye; Brian D Peyser; Xuewen Pan; Jef D Boeke; Forrest A Spencer; Joel S Bader
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Mapping genetic interactions in cancer: a road to rational combination therapies.

Authors:  Beril Tutuncuoglu; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Genetic-interaction screens uncover novel biological roles and regulators of transcription factors in fission yeast.

Authors:  Kate Chatfield-Reed; Kurtis Marno Jones; Farah Shah; Gordon Chua
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.542

3.  Predicting and explaining the impact of genetic disruptions and interactions on organismal viability.

Authors:  Bader F Al-Anzi; Mohammad Khajah; Saja A Fakhraldeen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 6.931

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.