Literature DB >> 28730270

The patient experience of musculoskeletal imaging tests for investigation of inflammatory arthritis: a mixed-methods study.

Sandra Bourke1, William J Taylor2, Anthony J Doyle3, Merryn Gott4, Nicola Dalbeth5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to understand the patient experience of musculoskeletal imaging tests for investigation of inflammatory arthritis and factors that contribute to this experience. We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 33 patients who had a recent peripheral joint musculoskeletal imaging test for investigation of inflammatory arthritis. Data from these interviews were used to generate an 18-item questionnaire which was posted to rheumatology clinic patients within 6 weeks of peripheral joint imaging. Variables associated with the overall experience of the test were analysed using stepwise linear regression. Analysis of the interviews identified six themes: knowledge about the test, awareness of potential harm, the role of imaging in clinical care, discomfort, experience of waiting and 'seeing is believing'. Completed questionnaires were available from 132 patients. In regression analysis, a strong negative association was observed between the 'discomfort during the test' item and the overall experience of the test (standardised beta -0.35, p < 0.001). 'Staff made the experience better' (0.26, p < 0.001) and 'information provided' (0.28, p < 0.001) were positively associated with the overall experience of the test. For those who viewed their images, 'looking at the images with my doctor made me feel more involved in my care' (0.24, p = 0.022) was also associated positively with overall experience. Factors before, during and after a musculoskeletal imaging test contribute to the patient experience. The overall experience is most influenced by patient discomfort and interactions with staff during the test, information provided and viewing images to improve patient involvement in clinical care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthritis; Imaging; Patient perspective; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28730270     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3760-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  19 in total

1.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.

Authors:  C C Preston; A M Colman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research.

Authors:  Frances Ryan; Michael Coughlan; Patricia Cronin
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2007 Jun 28-Jul 11

3.  It's like being in another world--patients' lived experience of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Erna Törnqvist; Asa Månsson; Elna-Marie Larsson; Inger Hallström
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.036

4.  'The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through': a qualitative study on patients' experiences of magnetic resonance imaging examinations.

Authors:  Sofia Carlsson; Eva Carlsson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Seeing what's happening on the inside: patients' views of the value of diagnostic cardiac computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Daniel A Devcich; Christopher J Ellis; Natasha Waltham; Elizabeth Broadbent; Keith J Petrie
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-11-20

6.  Subjective experiences of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D Thorp; R G Owens; G Whitehouse; M E Dewey
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Patients' perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R MacKenzie; C Sims; R G Owens; A K Dixon
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  The patient experience of high technology medical imaging: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Zachary Munn; Zoe Jordan
Journal:  JBI Libr Syst Rev       Date:  2011

9.  To see or not to see: a qualitative interview study of patients' views on their own diagnostic images.

Authors:  Leslie E Carlin; Helen E Smith; Flis Henwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Observing real-time images during ultrasound-guided procedures improves patients' experience.

Authors:  Ilfita Sahbudin; Jason Bell; Kanta Kumar; Karim Raza; Andrew Filer
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  3 in total

1.  Provider Perspectives of Patient Experiences in Primary Care Imaging.

Authors:  Monica L Zigman Suchsland; Victoria Hardy; Ying Zhang; Patrick D Vigil; Kimberly L Collins; William M Woodhouse; Roger Chou; Steven D Findlay; Danielle C Lavallee; Matthew J Thompson
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 2.  A glance into the future of gout.

Authors:  Francisca Sivera; Mariano Andres; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.625

3.  Qualitative study to explore radiologist and radiologic technologist perceptions of outcomes patients experience during imaging in the USA.

Authors:  Monica Zigman Suchsland; Maria Jessica Cruz; Victoria Hardy; Jeffrey Jarvik; Gianna McMillan; Anne Brittain; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.