Literature DB >> 2340700

Subjective experiences of magnetic resonance imaging.

D Thorp1, R G Owens, G Whitehouse, M E Dewey.   

Abstract

Clinical experience with the new technology of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has indicated that the procedure may produce anxiety in a number of patients, to the extent that occasionally a patient may be unwilling to undergo the procedure. A study of patients' subjective experiences of MRI was therefore conducted and these were compared with those of patients undergoing computed tomography (CT). Initial interviews with 15 MRI and 15 CT patients led to the development of a questionnaire which was administered to a further 40 patients in each setting. No significant differences were found between those factors identified as unpleasant in MRI and those of CT, with the exception of the confined space of MRI; 40% of the MRI patients found this unpleasant by comparison with only 15% of the CT patients. Principal components analysis of the concerns expressed suggested three factors, to do with the machine itself, the environment of the machine, and the social interactions involved. Patients finding the procedures unpleasant tended to be those with high initial levels of anxiety, little experience of diagnostic procedures, and believing themselves to have cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2340700     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81665-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  7 in total

1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging as experienced by stroke survivors.

Authors:  Niloufar Niakosari Hadidi; Kathryn R Cullen; Leah M J Hall; Ruth Lindquist; Kathleen C Buckwalter; Emily Mathews
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.571

2.  The patient experience of musculoskeletal imaging tests for investigation of inflammatory arthritis: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Sandra Bourke; William J Taylor; Anthony J Doyle; Merryn Gott; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions.

Authors:  P J Drew; L W Turnbull; S Chatterjee; J Read; P J Carleton; J N Fox; J R Monson; M J Kerin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A comparison of the psychological burden of PET/MRI and PET/CT scans and association to initial state anxiety and previous imaging experiences.

Authors:  R I Shortman; D Neriman; J Hoath; L Millner; R Endozo; G Azzopardi; C O'Meara; J Bomanji; A M Groves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The role of latency period in quality management for free-breathing coronary wall MRI.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ying Liu; Xiaoming Bi; Biao Lu; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Comparing the patient experience between a novel 360° gamma camera (VERITON-CT) and a conventional dual head gamma camera.

Authors:  Hend Komber; David Little; Sarah Cade; Richard Graham; Stewart Redman
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2021-11-08

7.  The functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) procedure as experienced by healthy participants and stroke patients--a pilot study.

Authors:  André J Szameitat; Shan Shen; Annette Sterr
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.930

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.