Literature DB >> 28729441

Switch-Independent Task Representations in Frontal and Parietal Cortex.

Lasse S Loose1,2, David Wisniewski3,2,4, Marco Rusconi3, Thomas Goschke2, John-Dylan Haynes3,2,5,6.   

Abstract

Alternating between two tasks is effortful and impairs performance. Previous fMRI studies have found increased activity in frontoparietal cortex when task switching is required. One possibility is that the additional control demands for switch trials are met by strengthening task representations in the human brain. Alternatively, on switch trials, the residual representation of the previous task might impede the buildup of a neural task representation. This would predict weaker task representations on switch trials, thus also explaining the performance costs. To test this, male and female participants were cued to perform one of two similar tasks, with the task being repeated or switched between successive trials. Multivoxel pattern analysis was used to test which regions encode the tasks and whether this encoding differs between switch and repeat trials. As expected, we found information about task representations in frontal and parietal cortex, but there was no difference in the decoding accuracy of task-related information between switch and repeat trials. Using cross-classification, we found that the frontoparietal cortex encodes tasks using a generalizable spatial pattern in switch and repeat trials. Therefore, task representations in frontal and parietal cortex are largely switch independent. We found no evidence that neural information about task representations in these regions can explain behavioral costs usually associated with task switching.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Alternating between two tasks is effortful and slows down performance. One possible explanation is that the representations in the human brain need time to build up and are thus weaker on switch trials, explaining performance costs. Alternatively, task representations might even be enhanced to overcome the previous task. Here, we used a combination of fMRI and a brain classifier to test whether the additional control demands under switching conditions lead to an increased or decreased strength of task representations in frontoparietal brain regions. We found that task representations are not modulated significantly by switching processes and generalize across switching conditions. Therefore, task representations in the human brain cannot account for the performance costs associated with alternating between tasks.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/378033-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MVPA; cognitive control; fMRI; parietal cortex; task set; task switching

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28729441      PMCID: PMC6596903          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3656-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  12 in total

1.  Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Henry M Jones; Johanny Castillo; David Badre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Atlas-Based Classification Algorithms for Identification of Informative Brain Regions in fMRI Data.

Authors:  Juan E Arco; Paloma Díaz-Gutiérrez; Javier Ramírez; María Ruz
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-04

3.  Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Integrated externally and internally generated task predictions jointly guide cognitive control in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Anthony D Wagner; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Cross-Hemispheric Complementary Prefrontal Mechanisms during Task Switching under Perceptual Uncertainty.

Authors:  Kaho Tsumura; Ryuta Aoki; Masaki Takeda; Kiyoshi Nakahara; Koji Jimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Abstract task representations for inference and control.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; David Badre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 24.482

7.  Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.

Authors:  Lei Qiao; Lijie Zhang; Antao Chen; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Context-Dependence and Context-Invariance in the Neural Coding of Intentional Action.

Authors:  David Wisniewski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-27

9.  Action sharpens sensory representations of expected outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel Yon; Sam J Gilbert; Floris P de Lange; Clare Press
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The Intensity of Early Attentional Processing, but Not Conflict Monitoring, Determines the Size of Subliminal Response Conflicts.

Authors:  Wiebke Bensmann; Amirali Vahid; Christian Beste; Ann-Kathrin Stock
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.