Yea Woon Kim1, AeRi Kim2. 1. Department of Molecular Biology, Pusan National University, Busan, N/A, 46241, Korea (South), Republic of. 2. Department of Molecular Biology, Pusan National University, Busan, N/A, 46241, Korea (South), Republic of kimaeri@pusan.ac.kr.
Transcription factors regulate the transcription of target genes by binding to motifs
present in regulatory regions of the genome. The roles of transcription factors have
been elucidated by inhibiting their expressions in a cellular environment [1,2] or by
mutating their binding motifs in extrachromosomal loci [3-7]. Such
expressional inhibition can demonstrate their direct roles, but cannot exclude
indirect effects because transcription factors often affect the expressions of other
transcription factors. Thus, mutation at binding motifs can better reveal the direct
roles of transcription factors. However such mutations have not been commonly tried
in a genome context because of technical difficulties in genome editing.
Furthermore, binding motifs for different transcription factors are closely located
in regulatory regions such as enhancers or promoters.Recently, an effective genome editing tool was developed from bacterial adaptive
immune system type II, clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats
(CRISPR) [8,9]. In the bacterial CRISPR system, CRISPR RNA (crRNA) hybridizes with
trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA) [10]. The crRNA–tracrRNA duplex directs CRISPR-associated
protein 9 (Cas9) endonuclease into target sequences by base-pairing crRNA with DNA
[11]. DNA cleavage by Cas9 requires a
Protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) next to target sequences [8,11,12]. In the CRISPR/Cas9 system for
genome editing, the crRNA–tracrRNA duplex has been simplified to a single
guide RNA (sgRNA) [8,13], which usually contains 20 nts for base pairing with target
sequences. sgRNA-directed Cas9 has been shown to generate double-stranded breaks in
the target sequences [8,11]. These breaks are repaired in a non-homologous end joining
manner, resulting in mutations in target sequences [13-15]. The
CRISPR/Cas9 system has been used for knocking out genes by disrupting coding
regions in various cell lines and organisms [16-22].spCas9 derived from Streptococcus pyogenes uses
5′-NGG-3′ sequences as PAMs [8,23]. These sequences occur
every eight bases in the human genome [13],
which suggests that almost all the genome sequences can be cleaved by the spCas9.
Genome targetting using spCas9 gives rise to the deletion of <10 bp in most
cases and the insertion or substitution of short sequences in low frequency [16,24].
Here, we applied the CRISPR/spCas9 system to mutate the binding motifs of
transcription factors in a genome context, because these motifs are typically
∼10 bp [25]. The locus control region
(LCR) hypersensitive sites (HSs) of the human β-globin locus were used as
model regulatory regions, which contains binding motifs for tissue-specific
transcription factors such as GATA-1, TAL1, and KLF1 [26]. To clearly analyze changes by genome editing, we employed
mouse MEL/ch11 cells that contain a human chromosome 11 where the
β-globin locus is present [27]. We
found that the CRISPR/spCas9 system can effectively mutate the binding motifs
of transcription factors in a genome context and believe that it will contribute to
studies on the direct roles of transcription factors.
Materials and methods
Cloning guide sequences of sgRNA into CRISPR vectors
Guide sequences of sgRNA were cloned into lentiCRISPRv2 vector (Addgene #52961)
[18] as suggested by the
manufacturer, but with modifications in the digestion and dephosphorylation
steps. To use the BsmBI site for cloning in lentiCRISPRv2 vector,
‘CACCG’ were added to the 5′ end of oligonucleotides for
guide sequences, and ‘AAAC’ and ‘C’ were added to
the 5′ and 3′ ends of oligonucleotides for complementary
sequences, respectively. A pair of oligonucleotides (10 nM) was phosphorylated
with T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB M0201S) at 37°C for 1 h in 10
μl of reaction volume, annealed by heating to 95°C for 5 min and
cooling to 25°C at 0.5°C/min, and then diluted to 1:1000 in
sterile water. One microgram of lentiCRISPRv2 vector was digested and
dephosphorylated with FastDigest BsmBI (Thermo Scientific FD0454) and FastAP
(Thermo Scientific EF0651) at 37°C for 30 min in 20 μl of reaction
volume. Fifty nanograms of digested vector and 1 μl of diluted
oligonucleotide duplex were ligated with Quick T4 DNA ligase (NEB M2200S) at
25°C for 20 min in 11 μl of reaction volume. Ligated plasmid
vectors were introduced into competent Stbl3 bacteria. For cloning into
pLH-spsgRNA2 vector (Addgene #64114) [28], oligonucleotides were synthesized by adding ‘ACCG’ to
the 5′ end of target sequences and ‘AAAC’ to 5′ end
of complementary sequences. This pair of oligonucleotides was phosphorylated and
annealed as described above, and then cloned into BbsI (NEB R0539S) site in
pLH-spsgRNA2 vector. Ligated plasmid vectors were introduced into competent
Stbl3 bacteria. All plasmid vectors were prepared using Plasmid Mini Kits
(Qiagen). The EGFP sequences (5′-GGGCGAGGAGCTGTTCACCG-3′) were
used as control guide sequences [18].
Cell culture and lentiviral transduction
MEL/ch11 and 293FT cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco) supplemented
with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco). To
produce lentivirus, 0.5 μg lentiviral vector and 1.5 μg packaging
mix (pLP1, pLP2, and pLP/VSVG) were diluted in 125 μl Opti-MEM
(Gibco), and 6 μl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in another 125
μl Opti-MEM. After incubation for 5 min at room temperature, they were
mixed and incubated for an additional 20 min. The DNA-Lipofectamine 2000 mixture
was added to 1 × 106 293FT cells in six-well plate and medium
containing the mixture was changed with complete medium the next day. At 72 h
after transfection, lentiviral supernatants were harvested and filtered through
a 0.45-μm membrane. MEL/ch11 cells were infected with lentiviral
supernatants in the presence of 6 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma) and
medium was replaced with fresh one the next day. Cells were selected using 2
μg/ml puromycin (Sigma) for lentiCRISPRv2 vector or 500
μg/ml hygromycin (Invitrogen) for pLH-spsgRNA2 vector at 72 h
after transduction.
Screening of mutant cell clones
Clonal cells were grown in 96-well plates after antibiotics selection, and then
transferred to 24-well plates when the cell numbers reached 1 ×
105 per well. To screen clones with mutations in sequences
targetted by sgRNA, genomic DNA was isolated using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit
(Qiagen) from 1 × 106 cells, and amplified by quantitative PCR
(qPCR) using the following parameters: 20 ng genomic DNA, 4.5 μM forward
primer, 4.5 μM reverse primer, and 1× Power SYBR Green PCR master
mix (Applied Biosystems) in 10 μl of reaction volume using the 7300
real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Dissociation curves of qPCR were
analyzed using qPCR program and PCR products were visualized on agarose gels.
Mutations were clarified by DNA sequencing analysis. The sequences of primers
used for PCR are presented in Supplementary Table S1.
ChIP
Clonal MEL/ch11 cells were cultured at 1.5 × 105 cells
per ml in 5 mM HMBA (Sigma) for 72 h to activate the β-globin locus. To
cross-link protein to genomic DNA, 1 × 107 cells were
incubated in culture medium containing 1% formaldehyde (Sigma) at
25°C for 10 min with shaking, and then glycine (Invitrogen) was added to
a final concentration of 0.125 M. After PBS washing, cross-linked cells were
incubated in cell lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 0.2% NP-40, pH
8.0) at 4°C for 10 min and centrifuged at 600
for 5 min to isolate nuclei. The nuclei were
treated with 100 U of MNase (Worthington) at 37°C for 15 min, incubated
in nuclei lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS) at 4°C for
10 min and then sonicated to digest chromatin to mainly mononucleosomes. After
preclearing with protein G agarose beads (Millipore), chromatin was made to
react with antibodies at 4°C for 3 h, and protein–DNA complexes
were collected using protein G agarose beads. DNA was purified by phenol
extraction and ethanol precipitation and then dissolved in 150 μl of
Tris/EDTA buffer. DNA obtained by ChIP was analyzed by qPCR using TaqMan
chemistry and the following parameters: 2 μl DNA, 2 μM TaqMan
probe, 4.5 μM primers, and 1× TaqMan universal master mix II
(Applied Biosystems) in 10 μl of reaction volume using the 7300 real-time
PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Antibodies used for ChIP were normal goat IgG
(sc-2028), GATA-1 (sc-1233), and TAL1 (sc-12984) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
and KLF1 (ab2483) from Abcam. The sequences of probes and primers used for ChIP
assay are presented in Supplementary Table S2.
Results and discussion
Application of the CRISPR/spCas9 system to the mutation of the binding
motifs of transcription factors in the human β-globin LCR HSs
The human β-globin LCR HSs, which act as enhancers for the β-like
globin genes, contain binding motifs for erythroid-specific transcription
factors, GATA-1, TAL1, and KLF1 [26]. To
mutate these motifs in the LCR HS2 and HS3, we obtained candidate guide
sequences for sgRNA in the CRISPR/spCas9 system using an online tool
(http://crispr.mit.edu) and chose that their
putative cutting sites are located in binding motifs (Figure 1A,B). This tool provides scores for guide sequences
that are inversely related to the possibility of binding to off-target DNA. The
scores of the chosen guide sequences exceeded 70, except for sequences
targetting the KLF1 motif in LCR HS3 (HS3_KL_R1) (Figure 1B). Next, we cloned the guide
sequences into lentiCRISPRv2 vector and transduced them into MEL/ch11
cells using lentiviral system (Figure 1C),
because suspension cells, like MEL cells, are inefficiently transfected using
reagents such as Lipofectamine. Transduced cells were selected using puromycin,
diluted, and grown in 96-well plates to obtain clonal cells.
Figure 1
The CRISPR/spCas9 strategy for mutating binding motifs for
transcription factors
(A) The human β-globin locus is presented. Vertical
gray arrows indicate DNase I HSs in the LCR and 3′-HS1. The five
globin genes, ε,
,,
δ, and β are
represented by rectangle in sequence. DNA sequences are for the LCR HS3
and HS2, and the binding motifs of transcription factors are marked by
colored bases; GATA-1 motif: red, KLF1 motif: green, and TAL1 motif:
blue. Target sequences for sgRNA are indicated by purple lines with PAMs
in red lines. (B) Guide sequences of sgRNA are listed with
names, scores, and PAM sequences, where (+) and (–) mean guide
sequences are positive or negative strand DNA, respectively.
(C) Experimental procedure for mutating binding motifs
for transcription factors in MEL/ch11 cells is illustrated and
described in ‘Materials and methods’ section.
The CRISPR/spCas9 strategy for mutating binding motifs for
transcription factors
(A) The human β-globin locus is presented. Vertical
gray arrows indicate DNase I HSs in the LCR and 3′-HS1. The five
globin genes, ε,
,,
δ, and β are
represented by rectangle in sequence. DNA sequences are for the LCR HS3
and HS2, and the binding motifs of transcription factors are marked by
colored bases; GATA-1 motif: red, KLF1 motif: green, and TAL1 motif:
blue. Target sequences for sgRNA are indicated by purple lines with PAMs
in red lines. (B) Guide sequences of sgRNA are listed with
names, scores, and PAM sequences, where (+) and (–) mean guide
sequences are positive or negative strand DNA, respectively.
(C) Experimental procedure for mutating binding motifs
for transcription factors in MEL/ch11 cells is illustrated and
described in ‘Materials and methods’ section.
Screening of mutations generated by the CRISPR/spCas9 system
It is important to screen cell clones that are desirably mutated in target
sequences by the CRISPR/spCas9 system. For initial screening, genomic DNA
was purified and analyzed by PCR. Primer sets for PCR were designed for guide
sequences (A2F/R) and both side regions (A1F/R, A3F/R)
(Figure 2A). Figure 2B shows the results of qPCR for wild-type
MEL/ch11 cells and clones in which the LCR HS3GATA-1 motif
(HS3ΔGA) or the TAL1 motif (HS3ΔTA) was targetted by guided
spCas9. Genomic DNA was similarly amplified using A1 or A3 primer sets in
wild-type cells and HS3ΔGA and HS3ΔTA clones. However, A2 primer
set did not amplify DNA in HS3ΔGA and HS3ΔTA clones, indicating
that mutations occurred in regions annealed by A2 primers (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure S1A).
Figure 2
Screening of mutations generated by the CRISPR/spCas9
system
(A) The locations of primer sets for PCR are presented on
DNA with respect to the target sequences of sgRNA. The target sequences
are 20 nts in length, and ‘NGG’ nucleotides acting as PAMs
are numbered as ‘+1’, ‘+2’, and
‘+3’. One primer in A2 amplicon (red arrows) locates on
the target sequences, and A2R-1 primer is on next to the target
sequences. A1 (blue arrows) and A3 primers (green arrows) locate in both
flanking regions of the target sequences. A4F/R (yellow arrows)
primers amplify large region including A1, A2, and A3 amplicons.
(B) Genomic DNA from clones targetted by the
CRISPR/spCas9 system, was amplified by qPCR using the three
primer sets, A1, A2, and A3. PCR product amounts were compared using IVR
amplicon for intervening region between the LCR and
ε-globin gene as an internal control and
then normalized compared with amounts in wild-type (Wt) MEL/ch11
cells. (C) In HS3ΔKL clones, PCR products amplified
by A1F/R and A2F/R-1 primers were visualized on an agarose
gel, M is the DNA marker. (D) DNA sequences in the LCR HS3
are presented for Wt cells and clones with GATA-1, TAL1, or KLF1 motif
deletions. The binding motifs of transcription factors are marked by
colored bases as described in Figure
1. Black dashes represent deleted nucleotides and yellow
bases are inserted nucleotides. (E) Genomic DNA of clones
was amplified and quantitated as described above. PCR products amplified
by A4F/R primers were visualized in an agarose gel.
Screening of mutations generated by the CRISPR/spCas9
system
(A) The locations of primer sets for PCR are presented on
DNA with respect to the target sequences of sgRNA. The target sequences
are 20 nts in length, and ‘NGG’ nucleotides acting as PAMs
are numbered as ‘+1’, ‘+2’, and
‘+3’. One primer in A2 amplicon (red arrows) locates on
the target sequences, and A2R-1 primer is on next to the target
sequences. A1 (blue arrows) and A3 primers (green arrows) locate in both
flanking regions of the target sequences. A4F/R (yellow arrows)
primers amplify large region including A1, A2, and A3 amplicons.
(B) Genomic DNA from clones targetted by the
CRISPR/spCas9 system, was amplified by qPCR using the three
primer sets, A1, A2, and A3. PCR product amounts were compared using IVR
amplicon for intervening region between the LCR and
ε-globin gene as an internal control and
then normalized compared with amounts in wild-type (Wt) MEL/ch11
cells. (C) In HS3ΔKL clones, PCR products amplified
by A1F/R and A2F/R-1 primers were visualized on an agarose
gel, M is the DNA marker. (D) DNA sequences in the LCR HS3
are presented for Wt cells and clones with GATA-1, TAL1, or KLF1 motif
deletions. The binding motifs of transcription factors are marked by
colored bases as described in Figure
1. Black dashes represent deleted nucleotides and yellow
bases are inserted nucleotides. (E) Genomic DNA of clones
was amplified and quantitated as described above. PCR products amplified
by A4F/R primers were visualized in an agarose gel.To screen clones in which the LCR HS3KLF1 motif was targetted, A2F-1 primer was
designed in the outside region of target sequences because of high GC content in
target sequences. Deletions in target sequences were detected by comparing sizes
of PCR products (Figure 2C) and by
comparing dissociation curves of qPCR (Supplementary Figure S1B). The reduction
in PCR product sizes resulted in changes in dissociation curves. Finally mutated
regions were identified by DNA sequencing using A4F/R primers. Sequencing
results showed that 22 and 12 bp, which include a GATA-1 binding motif, were
deleted in HS3ΔGA #1 and #2 clones, respectively (Figure 2D). Mutations of the TAL1 and KLF1 motifs were
sequenced in HS3ΔTA and HS3ΔKL clones. These results show that
binding motifs for transcription factors can be mutated by sgRNAs of the
CRISPR/spCas9 system in a genome context.On the other hand, we found some clones in which genomic DNA was not amplified by
the A1 or A3 primer set in addition to A2 primer set (Figure 2E). It indicates that large regions, including
target sequences, were deleted by the attack of guided-spCas9. To determine the
approximate lengths of deleted regions, we performed PCR using A4F/R
primers, which cover large regions including A1, A2, and A3 amplicons, and ran
PCR products in 0.8% agarose gel. It was found that deleted regions had
lengths up to 400 bp. Using the same strategy, clones with mutations in the
GATA-1 or KLF1 motifs of LCR HS2 were screened and sequenced (Supplementary
Figure S2).The mutations of target sequences can be analyzed using various methods. Mismatch
cleavage assay is most commonly used to analyze genome edited by
CRISPR/Cas9 [29]. This assay uses
heteroduplex DNA that is formed by denaturing and annealing PCR products and
digests it using Surveyor nuclease or T7E1 nuclease [29]. However, this assay cannot be used for haploid cells
or single chromosomes, such as sex chromosomes, and does not provide information
about mutated regions. In contrast with the mismatch cleavage assay, analysis
using qPCR can provide information about the locations and approximate lengths
of deletions. In addition, many clones can be screened and analyzed in one time
by qPCR. Even deletion and/or insertion in a couple of base pair can be
missed out in genome screening using qPCR and agarose gel running, this qPCR
strategy still provides a simple and efficient means for screening mutant clones
for transcription factor binding motifs.
Deletion of binding motifs for transcription factors inhibited their binding
in a chromatin environment
To determine whether the deletion of binding motifs results in the loss of
transcription factor binding, we carried out ChIP assays on three mutant clones,
that are HS3ΔGA#2, HS3ΔTA#1, and HS3ΔKL#2. The
HS3ΔGA#2 and HS3ΔTA#1 clones showed decrease in approximately
50% in the occupancies of GATA-1 and TAL1 in the LCR HS3, respectively,
as compared with control cells (Figure
3A,B). KLF1 occupancy was more strongly decreased in the HS3ΔKL#2
clone (Figure 3C). The incomplete loss of
occupancy for GATA-1 and TAL1 may have been due to other binding motifs near
target motifs. Indeed, there are two or more GATA-1 and TAL1 motifs within 200
bp in the human β-globin LCR HS3, whereas only one cluster of KLF1 motifs
in the LCR HS3, which was deleted in the HS3ΔKL#2 clone. These results
indicate that binding motif deletion can inhibit the binding of transcription
factor in a chromatin environment.
Figure 3
Occupancy of transcription factors in binding motif mutant
clones
Control cells and clones with GATA-1 (A), TAL1
(B), or KLF1 (C) motif deletion were
subjected to ChIP using antibodies specific for GATA-1, TAL1, or KLF1.
Amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA were compared with input DNA and then
normalized compared with amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA in the mouse
β-globin LCR HS2. The mouse Actin gene served as
an internal negative control and normal goat IgG (IgG) as an
experimental negative control. Results are the means ± S.E.M. of
two independent experiments;
**P<0.01.
Occupancy of transcription factors in binding motif mutant
clones
Control cells and clones with GATA-1 (A), TAL1
(B), or KLF1 (C) motif deletion were
subjected to ChIP using antibodies specific for GATA-1, TAL1, or KLF1.
Amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA were compared with input DNA and then
normalized compared with amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA in the mouse
β-globin LCR HS2. The mouse Actin gene served as
an internal negative control and normal goat IgG (IgG) as an
experimental negative control. Results are the means ± S.E.M. of
two independent experiments;
**P<0.01.
Double deletion of GATA-1 binding motifs in the human β-globin LCR
HS3
To more strictly inhibit GATA-1 binding in the LCR HS3, we tried to mutate
another GATA-1-binding motif located near the first GATA-1 motif. Guide
sequences targetting the second GATA-1 binding motif (HS3_GA_R2)
were cloned into pLH-spsgRNA2 vector, which has the hygromycin resistance gene
as a selectable marker, and then transduced into the HS3ΔGA#2 clone using
the procedure described in Figure 1C. After
hygromycin selection, clones were analyzed by qPCR using the primer sets shown
in Figure 4A. In clone #1 and #2 of
HS3ΔΔGA, genomic DNA was not properly amplified by A2 primers
(Figure 4B). DNA sequencing revealed
that 16 and 37 bp including the second GATA-1 motif were deleted in
HS3ΔΔGA #1 and #2, respectively, in addition to the deletion of 12
bp for the first GATA-1 motif (Figure 4C).
Finally, we analyzed the occupancy of GATA-1 by ChIP. It was found GATA-1
occupancy was strongly decreased in the LCR HS3 (Figure 4D). These results show that two motifs for the same
transcription factor can be sequentially deleted using CRISPR/Cas9
systems with different selection markers, and that this results in greater
inhibition of factor binding.
Figure 4
Double deletion of GATA-1-binding motifs in the human β-globin
LCR HS3
(A) DNA sequences of HS3 in the HS3ΔGA#2 clone are
presented with target sequences (purple line) for sgRNA. Another GATA-1
motif is indicated by six red bases. A2F primer (red arrows) is on the
GATA-1 motif. (B) Genomic DNA was amplified by PCR in the
HS3ΔΔGA clones. Amounts of PCR products were measured as
described in Figure 2.
(C) DNA sequences in the LCR HS3 are presented for Wt,
HS3ΔGA#2 clone, and HS3ΔΔGA#1 and #2 clones.
(D) ChIP was performed with antibodies specific for
GATA-1 in the HS3ΔΔGA#1. Amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA
were determined as described in Figure
3; **P<0.01.
Double deletion of GATA-1-binding motifs in the human β-globin
LCR HS3
(A) DNA sequences of HS3 in the HS3ΔGA#2 clone are
presented with target sequences (purple line) for sgRNA. Another GATA-1
motif is indicated by six red bases. A2F primer (red arrows) is on the
GATA-1 motif. (B) Genomic DNA was amplified by PCR in the
HS3ΔΔGA clones. Amounts of PCR products were measured as
described in Figure 2.
(C) DNA sequences in the LCR HS3 are presented for Wt,
HS3ΔGA#2 clone, and HS3ΔΔGA#1 and #2 clones.
(D) ChIP was performed with antibodies specific for
GATA-1 in the HS3ΔΔGA#1. Amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA
were determined as described in Figure
3; **P<0.01.
Characterization of mutations generated by the CRISPR/spCas9
system
The CRISPR/Cas9 technique has evolved over several years and has been
utilized to knockout gene expression in many studies [16-22]. To
determine whether this genome editing technique using spCas9 is suitable for
mutating binding motifs of transcription factors, we analyzed 94 clones that we
obtained with six kinds of sgRNA. We could have missed out clones having
mutations in a couple of base pairs because of the limited resolution of agarose
gels in screening processes. Initially, clones were sorted by the type of
mutation (Figure 5A). Sixty-eight clones
were found to only exhibit deletion of nucleotides in and near target sequences.
Insertion occurred in two clones without deletion and in eight clones with
deletion. Sixteen clones had a deletion of a region exceeding 1 kb, as
demonstrated by PCR using various pairs of primers. The number of inserted
nucleotides was under 20 bp in six out of ten clones (Figure 5B). The lengths of deleted regions were under 20 bp
in 48 of 76 clones (Figure 5C). These
mutation patterns are similar to those reported previously, but the lengths of
deleted regions was longer in our clones as compared with clones in that gene
bodies were targetted [14,16]. This may have been due to the
open-chromatin structure of the LCR HSs, which make them susceptible to attack
by Cas9 endonuclease. In spite of high sensitivity in enhancer regions, our
results show that the CRISPR/spCas9 system generates alterations mainly
in shorter regions, that is, under 20 bp.
Figure 5
Characterization of mutations generated by the CRISPR/spCas9
system
(A) Mutations in 94 clones generated using six kinds of
sgRNA were sorted by deletion and insertion. Mutations were analyzed by
qPCR and/or DNA sequencing. (B) Ten clones with an
insertion or an insertion and a deletion were sorted depending on the
lengths of inserted nucleotides. (C) Seventy-six clones
with a deletion of <1 kb were sorted depending on the lengths of
deleted nucleotides. (D) Deletion frequencies were
calculated at each nucleotide with respect to target sequences of sgRNA
in 48 clones with deletions of <20 bp. The first nucleotide of
PAM ‘NGG’ sequences in the red rectangle is indicated by
‘+1’, and nucleotides upstream and downstream of PAMs are
indicated by ‘–’ and ‘+’,
respectively. (E) Using 76 clones with deletions of
<1 kb, deletion frequencies were calculated at each nucleotide
with respect to target sequences of sgRNA.
Characterization of mutations generated by the CRISPR/spCas9
system
(A) Mutations in 94 clones generated using six kinds of
sgRNA were sorted by deletion and insertion. Mutations were analyzed by
qPCR and/or DNA sequencing. (B) Ten clones with an
insertion or an insertion and a deletion were sorted depending on the
lengths of inserted nucleotides. (C) Seventy-six clones
with a deletion of <1 kb were sorted depending on the lengths of
deleted nucleotides. (D) Deletion frequencies were
calculated at each nucleotide with respect to target sequences of sgRNA
in 48 clones with deletions of <20 bp. The first nucleotide of
PAM ‘NGG’ sequences in the red rectangle is indicated by
‘+1’, and nucleotides upstream and downstream of PAMs are
indicated by ‘–’ and ‘+’,
respectively. (E) Using 76 clones with deletions of
<1 kb, deletion frequencies were calculated at each nucleotide
with respect to target sequences of sgRNA.Next, we determined the locations of deleted nucleotides with respect to the
guide sequences of sgRNA in 48 clones containing deletions of under 20 bp (Figure 5D). The fourth and fifth nucleotides
upstream from PAMs were deleted in the clones over 90%, and several
nucleotides near them were deleted in relatively high frequencies. These
deletion patterns are consistent with those found in previous studies on
plasmids or oligonucleotides, in which a putative cleavage site was identified
between the third and fourth nucleotides upstream of PAMs [8,11]. Figure 5E shows the deletion pattern in 76
clones containing deletions of <1 kb. No directional preference was
observed to the up or downstream regions from the highly deleted nucleotides
between –1 and –6 from PAMs, although the downstream region was
deleted further in a small number of clones. This deletion pattern provides
guidelines regarding the choice of guide sequences for sgRNA.In summary, we mutated the binding motifs of transcription factors using the
CRISPR/spCas9 system in a genome context, and observed reductions in
transcription factor occupancies in a chromatin environment. Our findings imply
that the CRISPR/spCas9 system can be used to study the direct roles of
transcription factors for target genes without disturbing the expressions of
other transcription factors. Furthermore, DNA breaks caused by the
CRISPR/spCas9 system resulted mainly in deletions or insertions of less
than 20 nts, which indicates that this system is suitable for mutating short
cis-elements, such as transcription factor binding motifs.
Due to this restriction to short regions, other cis-elements
near target sequences might be maintained during genome editing using the
CRISPR/spCas9 system, which would allow study of the individual roles of
cis-elements. In addition, the deletion of binding motifs
for transcription factors using the CRISPR/Cas9 system would be useful
for inhibiting the expressions of target genes without side effects, because the
mutations of gene coding regions could result in the expression of abnormal
polypeptides by nucleotide deletion or frameshift in translation. In recent
studies, the ALAS2 gene transcription was severely inhibited by
a GATA-1 motif deletion generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system [30,31]. Enhancer deletion of the BCL11A gene using the
CRISPR/Cas9 system suggested the therapeutic possibility for the
β-hemoglobinopathies by failing BCL11A expression and resulting in
induction of the fetal γ-globin expression [32]. Overall, the CRISPR/Cas9 system is believed to
effectively mutate the binding motifs of transcription factors in a genome
context, and consequently the mutations can regulate the binding of
transcription factors in chromatin and might regulate gene expression.(A)PCR products amplified by A1F/R, A2F/R and A3F/R primers were visualized
on agarose gels in HS3ΔGA and HS3ΔTA clones. M is the DNA
marker. Dissociation curves generated by qPCR were presented for A1F/R and
A2F/R primersets. (B) Dissociation curves of qPCR were presented for A1F/R
and A2F/R-1 primer sets inHS3ΔKL clones.Screening of mutations generated by the CRISPR/spCas9 system in the
β-globin LCR HS2. (A) The locations of primer sets for PCR are
presented on DNA with the targets equences of sgRNA and PAMs as described in
Figure2. (B) Genomic DNA from clones was amplified by qPCR using the three
primer sets, A1, A2 and A3. PCR product amounts were compared using IVR
amplicon as an internal control and the nnormalized versus amounts in wild
type (Wt) MEL/ch11 cells. (C) DNA sequences in the LCR HS2 are presented for
wild type (Wt) cells and clones with GATA-1 or KLF1 motif deletions. The
binding motifs of transcription factors are marked by colored bases. Black
dashes are deleted nucleotides. (D) Genomic DNA of clones was amplified and
quantified as described above. PCR products amplified by A4F/R primers were
visualized in an agarose gel.
Supplementary Table 1
Sequences of primers for identifying mutations and for
sequencing.
Supplementary Table 2
Sequences of primers and probes for the ChIP assay.
Authors: Matthew C Canver; Daniel E Bauer; Abhishek Dass; Yvette Y Yien; Jacky Chung; Takeshi Masuda; Takahiro Maeda; Barry H Paw; Stuart H Orkin Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Nobuyuki Tanimura; Eli Miller; Kazuhiko Igarashi; David Yang; Judith N Burstyn; Colin N Dewey; Emery H Bresnick Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 8.807
Authors: Matthew C Canver; Elenoe C Smith; Falak Sher; Luca Pinello; Neville E Sanjana; Ophir Shalem; Diane D Chen; Patrick G Schupp; Divya S Vinjamur; Sara P Garcia; Sidinh Luc; Ryo Kurita; Yukio Nakamura; Yuko Fujiwara; Takahiro Maeda; Guo-Cheng Yuan; Feng Zhang; Stuart H Orkin; Daniel E Bauer Journal: Nature Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Robert Heler; Poulami Samai; Joshua W Modell; Catherine Weiner; Gregory W Goldberg; David Bikard; Luciano A Marraffini Journal: Nature Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Marta Moya-Jódar; Giulia Coppiello; Juan Roberto Rodríguez-Madoz; Gloria Abizanda; Paula Barlabé; Amaia Vilas-Zornoza; Asier Ullate-Agote; Chiara Luongo; Ernesto Rodríguez-Tobón; Sergio Navarro-Serna; Evelyne París-Oller; Maria Oficialdegui; Xonia Carvajal-Vergara; Laura Ordovás; Felipe Prósper; Francisco Alberto García-Vázquez; Xabier L Aranguren Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 3.231