Literature DB >> 28728498

Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials.

Lynn A Jansen1, Daruka Mahadevan2, Paul S Appelbaum3, William M P Klein4, Neil D Weinstein5, Motomi Mori1, Catherine Degnin1, Daniel P Sulmasy6.   

Abstract

Research has found that patient-subjects in early phase cancer trials exhibit unrealistic optimism regarding the risks and possible benefits of trial participation. Unrealistic optimism is associated with therapeutic misconception and failures to appreciate research-related information. This is the first study to assess whether those who decline to participate in these trials also exhibit unrealistic optimism. It is also the first study to assess whether there are significant differences in appreciation of research-related risks/benefits and therapeutic misconception between these two groups. We approached 261 patients at two academic medical centers who were offered enrollment in a Phase I, II, or I/II cancer trial (between 2012 and 2016). Two hundred thirty-three patients agreed to enroll in an early phase cancer trial, 171 of whom agreed to be interviewed for the study. Twenty-eight patients declined the offer to enroll, 15 of whom agreed to be interviewed for the study. Subjects participated in a structured face-to-face interview with a research associate trained to administer the study questionnaires. Acceptors demonstrated a significantly higher level of unrealistic optimism than decliners ( p < .05). Decliners had significantly less therapeutic misconception than acceptors (3.37 [ SD = 0.85] vs. 3.79 [ SD = 0.77], p = .042). There was a significant difference on one of the appreciation questions between acceptors and decliners ( p = .009). Comparative assessment of acceptors and decliners to early phase cancer trials casts light on whether unrealistic optimism is consequential for the decision to participate in these trials. The different levels of unrealistic optimism exhibited by these groups suggest that it may be a factor that affects the decision to participate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appreciation; early phase cancer trials; ethics; informed consent; therapeutic misconception; unrealistic optimism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28728498      PMCID: PMC6020823          DOI: 10.1177/1556264617720433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  17 in total

1.  Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism.

Authors:  Sam Horng; Christine Grady
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

2.  The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions.

Authors:  T Grisso; P S Appelbaum; C Hill-Fotouhi
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Phase 1 oncology trials and informed consent.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Research participants' "irrational" expectations: common or commonly mismeasured?

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Raymond de Vries; Renee Wilson; Sonali Parnami; Samuel Frank; Karl Kieburtz; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

5.  Unrealistic optimism in early-phase oncology trials.

Authors:  Lynn A Jansen; Paul S Appelbaum; William M P Klein; Neil D Weinstein; William Cook; Jessica S Fogel; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

6.  Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in Phase 1 cancer trials.

Authors:  S Catt; C Langridge; L Fallowfield; D C Talbot; V Jenkins
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Depressive symptoms are associated with unrealistic negative predictions of future life events.

Authors:  Daniel R Strunk; Howard Lopez; Robert J DeRubeis
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2005-08-26

8.  Evaluation of patient enrollment in oncology phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Diane A J van der Biessen; Merlijn A Cranendonk; Gaia Schiavon; Bronno van der Holt; Erik A C Wiemer; Ferry A L M Eskens; Jaap Verweij; Maja J A de Jonge; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-02-21

9.  Assessment of therapeutic misconception in older schizophrenia patients with a brief instrument.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Barton W Palmer; Monique Keehan; Dilip V Jeste; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Mindsets, informed consent, and research.

Authors:  Lynn A Jansen
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.683

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of Dispositional Optimism on Ethically Salient Research Perspectives: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Sangeeta Mondal; Tenzin Tsungmey; Katie Ryan; Laura B Dunn; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2022-05

2.  Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial.

Authors:  Gisell Castillo; Manoj M Lalu; Sarah Asad; Madison Foster; Natasha Kekre; Dean A Fergusson; Terry Hawrysh; Harold Atkins; Kednapa Thavorn; Joshua Montroy; Stuart Schwartz; Robert A Holt; Raewyn Broady; Justin Presseau
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.