Literature DB >> 16513873

Assessment of therapeutic misconception in older schizophrenia patients with a brief instrument.

Laura B Dunn1, Barton W Palmer, Monique Keehan, Dilip V Jeste, Paul S Appelbaum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: "Therapeutic misconception," or conflation of goals and procedures of clinical research with those of usual clinical care, is an important topic in research ethics because it may impede informed consent. How best to assess therapeutic misconception is unclear. Also unclear is to what degree patients with severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, may manifest these beliefs.
METHOD: With a hypothetical, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial as a stimulus, the authors examined the frequency of a key aspect of therapeutic misconception with a true/false scale in 87 middle-age and older patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. They also analyzed the demographic, clinical, neurocognitive, and decision-making correlates of therapeutic misconception and examined the psychometric properties of a scale designed to measure therapeutic misconception.
RESULTS: Subjects showed variable performance on the therapeutic misconception measure. Nearly one-third answered all questions correctly; two-thirds answered four or more of the six items correctly. Patients with less education or worse cognitive functioning manifested higher levels of therapeutic misconception. Degree of therapeutic misconception was inversely associated with understanding, appreciation, and reasoning scores on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research but was not associated with severity of psychopathology. The scale showed fair internal consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: As in studies of other patient populations, patients with schizophrenia show a substantial incidence of beliefs associated with therapeutic misconception. Further work should focus on refining measures of therapeutic misconception, identifying participants or protocols (e.g., higher-risk studies) in which it may warrant greater concern, and developing educational interventions to mitigate it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16513873     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  23 in total

Review 1.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Research With Cognitively Impaired Participants.

Authors:  Ukamaka M Oruche
Journal:  J Nurs Law       Date:  2009-10-01

3.  The ethics of research on deep brain stimulation for depression: decisional capacity and therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Carl Erik Fisher; Laura B Dunn; Paul P Christopher; Paul E Holtzheimer; Yan Leykin; Helen S Mayberg; Sarah H Lisanby; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Informed consent in dental care and research for the older adult population: A systematic review.

Authors:  Amrita Mukherjee; Alicia A Livinski; Joseph Millum; Steffany Chamut; Shahdokht Boroumand; Timothy J Iafolla; Margo R Adesanya; Bruce A Dye
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials.

Authors:  Lynn A Jansen; Daruka Mahadevan; Paul S Appelbaum; William M P Klein; Neil D Weinstein; Motomi Mori; Catherine Degnin; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Worth the risk? Relationship of incentives to risk and benefit perceptions and willingness to participate in schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Daniel S Kim; Ian E Fellows; Barton W Palmer
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Expression of therapeutic misconception amongst Egyptians: a qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Mayyada Wazaify; Susan S Khalil; Henry J Silverman
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Hidden Empirical Research Ethics: A Review of Three Health Journals from 2005 through 2006.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Rebecca L Volpe; Erica K Rangel
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Participants' Perceptions of Deep Brain Stimulation Research for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Risks, Benefits, and Therapeutic Misconception.

Authors:  Yan Leykin; Paul P Christopher; Paul E Holtzheimer; Paul S Appelbaum; Helen S Mayberg; Sarah H Lisanby; Laura B Dunn
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011-10

10.  Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Louise Howard; Isabel de Salis; Zelda Tomlin; Graham Thornicroft; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.