Literature DB >> 28728088

Phthalate and non-phthalate plasticizers in indoor dust from childcare facilities, salons, and homes across the USA.

Bikram Subedi1, Kenneth D Sullivan2, Birendra Dhungana3.   

Abstract

The quality of indoor environment has received considerable attention owing to the declining outdoor human activities and the associated public health issues. The prolonged exposure of children in childcare facilities or the occupational exposure of adults to indoor environmental triggers can be a culprit of the pathophysiology of several commonly observed idiopathic syndromes. In this study, concentrations of potentially toxic plasticizers (phthalates as well as non-phthalates) were investigated in 28 dust samples collected from three different indoor environments across the USA. The mean concentrations of non-phthalate plasticizers [acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate (ATBC), di-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA), and di-isobutyl adipate (DIBA)] were found at 0.51-880 μg/g for the first time in indoor dust samples from childcare facilities, homes, and salons across the USA. The observed concentrations of these replacement non-phthalate plasticizer were as high as di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, the most frequently detected phthalate plasticizer at highest concentration worldwide, in most of indoor dust samples. The estimated daily intakes of total phthalates (n = 7) by children and toddlers through indoor dust in childcare facilities were 1.6 times higher than the non-phthalate plasticizers (n = 3), whereas estimated daily intake of total non-phthalates for all age groups at homes were 1.9 times higher than the phthalate plasticizers. This study reveals, for the first time, a more elevated (∼3 folds) occupational intake of phthalate and non-phthalate plasticizers through the indoor dust at salons (214 and 285 ng/kg-bw/day, respectively) than at homes in the USA.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childcare facilities; Daily intake; Homes; Indoor dust; Non-phthalates; Phthalates; Plasticizers; Salons

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28728088     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  10 in total

1.  Lowering Urinary Phthalate Metabolite Concentrations among Children by Reducing Contaminated Dust in Housing Units: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Observational Study.

Authors:  Clara G Sears; Bruce P Lanphear; Antonia M Calafat; Aimin Chen; Julianne Skarha; Yingying Xu; Kimberly Yolton; Joseph M Braun
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Occupational Exposures Among Hair and Nail Salon Workers: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Lesliam Quiros-Alcala; Anna Z Pollack; Nedelina Tchangalova; Melissa DeSantiago; Lucy K A Kavi
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-12

3.  Children's exposure to phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers in the home: The TESIE study.

Authors:  Stephanie C Hammel; Jessica L Levasseur; Kate Hoffman; Allison L Phillips; Amelia M Lorenzo; Antonia M Calafat; Thomas F Webster; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Widespread occurrence of phthalate and non-phthalate plasticizers in single-use facemasks collected in the United States.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthi Vimalkumar; Hongkai Zhu; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Ecological and human health risks assessment of some polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in surface soils of central and southern parts of city of Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Samira Ranjbaran; Soheil Sobhanardakani; Mehrdad Cheraghi; Bahareh Lorestani; Maryam Kiani Sadr
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-07-31

Review 6.  Recent updates on phthalate exposure and human health: a special focus on liver toxicity and stem cell regeneration.

Authors:  Sarva Mangala Praveena; Seoh Wei Teh; Ranjith Kumar Rajendran; Narayanan Kannan; Chu-Ching Lin; Rozaini Abdullah; Suresh Kumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Indoor exposure to phthalates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to Canadian children: the Kingston allergy birth cohort.

Authors:  Yuchao Wan; Michelle L North; Garthika Navaranjan; Anne K Ellis; Jeffrey A Siegel; Miriam L Diamond
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Changes in Urinary Phthalate Metabolite Levels Before and After the Phthalate Contamination Event and Identification of Exposure Sources in a Cohort of Taiwanese Children.

Authors:  Chian-Feng Huang; I-Jen Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  ExpoKids: An R-based tool for characterizing aggregate chemical exposure during childhood.

Authors:  Mona Dai; Susan Y Euling; Linda Phillips; Glenn E Rice
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 10.  Opportunities for evaluating chemical exposures and child health in the United States: the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program.

Authors:  Jessie P Buckley; Emily S Barrett; Paloma I Beamer; Deborah H Bennett; Michael S Bloom; Timothy R Fennell; Rebecca C Fry; William E Funk; Ghassan B Hamra; Stephen S Hecht; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Ramsunder Iyer; Margaret R Karagas; Kristen Lyall; Patrick J Parsons; Edo D Pellizzari; Antonio J Signes-Pastor; Anne P Starling; Aolin Wang; Deborah J Watkins; Mingyu Zhang; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.371

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.