Literature DB >> 28727888

Association of Mental Health Status With Perception of Nasal Function.

Erika Strazdins1, Yu Feng Nie1, Raziqah Ramli2, Tom Palesy3, Jenna M Christensen4, George Nicholas Marcells5, Richard John Harvey6,7.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Mental health issues are thought to be overrepresented among patients undergoing rhinoplasty and may be associated with patient presentation prior to surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of poor mental health with perception of nasal function. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study of patients presenting for airway assessment was performed from December 1, 2011, to October 31, 2015, at 2 tertiary rhinoplasty centers in Sydney, Australia. Mental health was independently defined preoperatively by the Mental Component Summary of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (a score of <40 indicated poor mental well-being), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (a score of <15 indicated low self-esteem), and the Dysmorphic Concerns Questionnaire (a score of >11 indicated above-average dysmorphic concerns). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Nasal function was assessed with patient-reported outcome measures, including the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale, the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test, a visual analog scale to rate ease of breathing on the left and right sides, and Likert scales to assess overall function and nasal obstruction. Nasal airflow was assessed by nasal peak inspiratory flow, nasal airway resistance, and minimum cross-sectional area.
RESULTS: Among 495 patients in the study (302 women and 193 men; mean [SD] age, 36.5 [13.6] years), compared with patients with good mental health, those with poor mental health had poorer scores in all patient-reported outcome measures, including the visual analog scale for the left side (mean [SD], 51 [25] vs 42 [25]; P = .001), visual analog scale for the right side (mean [SD], 54 [24] vs 45 [26]; P < .001), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale (mean [SD], 2.64 [0.95] vs 1.96 [1.04]; P < .001), 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (mean [SD], 2.14 [0.84] vs 1.33 [0.83]; P < .001), nasal obstruction (58 of 145 [40.2%] vs 83 of 350 [23.7%] with severe or worse obstruction; P < .001), and nasal function (72 of 145 [49.7%] vs 111 of 350 [31.8%] with poor or worse function; P < .001). Subclinical differences in nasal peak inspiratory flow could be demonstrated, but all other nasal airflow measures were similar. Low self-esteem produced a similar pattern, but dysmorphia did not. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Poor mental health status is associated with a poorer self-perception of nasal function compared with those who are mentally healthy with clinically similar nasal airflow. Clinicians should be aware that patients with poor mental health reporting obstructed airflow may in part be representing an extension of their negative emotions rather than true obstruction and may require further assessment prior to surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28727888      PMCID: PMC5710631          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  44 in total

1.  Clinical implications of attentional bias in anxiety disorders: An integrative literature review.

Authors:  Sirous Mobini; Alec Grant
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2007-12

Review 2.  The central role of the nose in the face and the psyche: review of the nose and the psyche.

Authors:  Chiara Andretto Amodeo
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Do mental health and self-concept associate with rhinoplasty requests?

Authors:  Ali Reza Zahiroddin; Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani; Enayat Khalighi-Sigaroodi
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Patients with mild to moderate body dysmorphic disorder may benefit from rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Gabriel Almeida Arruda Felix; Maria José Azevedo de Brito; Fabio Xerfan Nahas; Hermano Tavares; Táki Athanássios Cordás; Gal Moreira Dini; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  A systematic review of patient-reported nasal obstruction scores: defining normative and symptomatic ranges in surgical patients.

Authors:  John S Rhee; Corbin D Sullivan; Dennis O Frank; Julia S Kimbell; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.611

Review 6.  The psychological aspects of rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Abel-Jan Tasman
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  A comparison of depression scores between aesthetic and functional rhinoplasty patients.

Authors:  Mohsen Naraghi; Mohammad Atari
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 8.  Psychosocial predictors, assessment, and outcomes of cosmetic procedures: a systematic rapid evidence assessment.

Authors:  Ginny Brunton; Nicole Paraskeva; Jenny Caird; Karen Schucan Bird; Josephine Kavanagh; Irene Kwan; Claire Stansfield; Nichola Rumsey; James Thomas
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 9.  Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  S J Cano; J P Browne; D L Lamping
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2004-01

10.  Cosmetic rhinoplasty in body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  D Veale; L De Haro; C Lambrou
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2003-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Association Between Mental Health Status and Patient Satisfaction With the Functional Outcomes of Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Erika Strazdins; Yu Feng Nie; Raziqah Ramli; Tom Palesy; Jenna M Christensen; Raquel Alvarado; George N Marcells; Richard J Harvey
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  Effectiveness of endoscopic intranasal incision reduction for nasal fractures.

Authors:  Shu Yan; Yan Jiang; Yan Wang; Kaixuan Chen; Xudong Yan; Xiaohan Sun; Jisheng Zhang; Na Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.