Literature DB >> 28727608

Evaluation of Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring in Trauma Patients with Low Hemoglobin Levels.

Medhat Gamal1, Bassant Abdelhamid1, Dina Zakaria1, Omnia Abd El Dayem2, Ashraf Rady1, Maher Fawzy1, Ahmed Hasanin1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bleeding is a leading cause of death among trauma patients. Delayed assessment of blood hemoglobin level might result in either unnecessary blood transfusion in nonindicated patients or delayed blood transfusion in critically bleeding patients. In this study, we evaluate the precision of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring in trauma patients with low hemoglobin levels.
METHODS: We included trauma patients with low hemoglobin levels (less than 8 g/dL) scheduled for surgical intervention. Blood samples were obtained on admission and after each blood unit with concomitant measurement of serum hemoglobin using radical-7 Masimo device. The change in blood hemoglobin after every transfused blood unit was also assessed by both methods (change in noninvasive Masimo hemoglobin [Delta-Sp-Hb] and change in laboratory hemoglobin [Delta-Lab-Hb]). The precision of Masimo hemoglobin level (Sp-Hb) compared with Laboratory hemoglobin level (Lab-Hb) was determined using both Bland-Altman and Pearson correlation analyses.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four time-matched samples were available for final analysis. Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent accuracy of Sp-Hb compared with Lab-Hb with mean bias of 0.12 g/dL and limits of agreement between -0.56 g/dL and 0.79 g/dL. Excellent correlation was reported between both measures with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.872. Excellent agreement was also reported between both Delta-Sp-Hb and Delta-Lab-Hb with mean bias of -0.05 and limits of agreement from -0.62 to 0.51
CONCLUSIONS: : Sp-Hb showed accurate precision in both absolute values and trend values compared with Lab-Hb measurement in trauma patients with low hemoglobin levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28727608     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  7 in total

Review 1.  Methods and analyzers for hemoglobin measurement in clinical laboratories and field settings.

Authors:  Ralph D Whitehead; Zuguo Mei; Carine Mapango; Maria Elena D Jefferds
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition.

Authors:  Donat R Spahn; Bertil Bouillon; Vladimir Cerny; Jacques Duranteau; Daniela Filipescu; Beverley J Hunt; Radko Komadina; Marc Maegele; Giuseppe Nardi; Louis Riddez; Charles-Marc Samama; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 3.  [Diagnostics and treatment of preoperative anemia].

Authors:  C Rosenthal; C von Heymann; L Kaufner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Accuracy and trending of non-invasive hemoglobin measurement during different volume and perfusion statuses.

Authors:  Abdelmoneim Adel; Wael Awada; Bassant Abdelhamid; Heba Omar; Omnia Abd El Dayem; Ahmed Hasanin; Ashraf Rady
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India.

Authors:  Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi; Jyoti Sharma; Shivam Pandey; Nausheen Zaidi; Maitreyee Bhattacharya; Rakhee Kar; Sitanshu Sekhar Kar; Abhishek Purohit; Sanjib Bandyopadhyay; Renu Saxena
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Intraoperative continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring in patients with placenta previa undergoing cesarean section: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hyunsung Kim; Sang-Hwan Do; Jung-Won Hwang; Hyo-Seok Na
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2019-10-31

7.  Multicenter comparison of three intraoperative hemoglobin trend monitoring methods.

Authors:  Richard L Applegate Ii; Patricia M Applegate; Maxime Cannesson; Prith Peiris; Beth L Ladlie; Klaus Torp
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.502

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.