Literature DB >> 28727544

Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.

Christiane K Kuhl1, Robin Bruhn1, Nils Krämer1, Sven Nebelung1, Axel Heidenreich1, Simone Schrading1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer achieved with abbreviated biparametric prostate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with full multiparametric contrast material-enhanced prostate MR imaging in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and negative transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy findings; to determine the significant cancer detection rate of biparametric versus full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging and between-reader agreement for interpretation of biparametric MR imaging. Materials and Methods In this institutional review board-approved retrospective review of prospectively acquired data, men with PSA greater than or equal to 3 ng/mL after negative transrectal US-guided biopsy findings underwent state-of-the-art, full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0-T including high-spatial-resolution structural imaging in several planes, diffusion-weighted imaging at 0, 800, 1000, and 1400 mm2/sec, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, obtained without endorectal coil within 34 minutes 19 seconds. One of four radiologists with different levels of expertise (1-9 years) first reviewed only a fraction of the full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR images, consisting of single-plane (axial) structural imaging (T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and diffusion-weighted imaging), acquired within 8 minutes 45 seconds (referred to as biparametric MR imaging), and established a diagnosis according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2; only thereafter, the remaining full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR images were read. Men with PI-RADS categories 3-5 underwent MR-guided targeted biopsy. Men with PI-RADS categories 1-2 remained in urologic follow-up for at least 2 years, with rebiopsy (transrectal US-guided or transperineal saturation) where appropriate. McNemar test was used to compare diagnostic accuracies. To investigate between-reader agreement, biparametric MR images of 100 patients were read independently by all three radiologists. Results A total of 542 men, aged 64.8 years ± 8.2 (median PSA, 7 ng/mL), were included. Biparametric MR imaging helped detect clinically significant prostate cancer in 138 men. Full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging allowed detection of one additional clinically significant prostate cancer (a stage pT2a, intermediate-risk cancer with a Gleason score of 3+4) and caused 11 additional false-positive diagnoses. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of clinically significant cancer of biparametric MR imaging (89.1%, 483 of 542) was similar to that of full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging (87.2%, 473 of 542). Between-reader agreement of biparametric MR imaging interpretation was substantial (κ = 0.81). Conclusion Biparametric MR imaging allows detection of clinically significant prostate cancer missed by transrectal US-guided biopsy. Biparametric prostate MR imaging takes less than 9 minutes examination time, works without contrast agent injection, and offers a diagnostic accuracy and cancer detection rate that are equivalent to those of conventional full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging protocols. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28727544     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  54 in total

1.  Population net benefit of prostate MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution contrast-enhanced imaging: A decision curve analysis.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ricardo Otazo; Daniel K Sodickson; Stella K Kang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Role of MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard C Wu; Amir H Lebastchi; Boris A Hadaschik; Mark Emberton; Caroline Moore; Pilar Laguna; Jurgen J Fütterer; Arvin K George
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Biparametric Prostate MRI Influencing Care Patterns in a Caribbean Population.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Prasad R Shankar
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-07-31

4.  Simplified PI-RADS with Biparametric MRI: A Practical Approach to Improve Management of PI-RADS Version 2 Category 3 Lesions.

Authors:  Michele Scialpi; Pietro Scialpi; Maria Cristina Aisa; Eugenio Martorana; Alfredo D'Andrea
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Fabian Steinkohl; Veronika Fritz; Jasmin Bektic; Theodoros Tokas; Friedrich Aigner; Thomas R W Herrmann; Michael Rieger; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Arguments against using an abbreviated or biparametric prostate MRI protocol.

Authors:  Felipe B Franco; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

Review 7.  Biparametric MRI of the prostate.

Authors:  Michele Scialpi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Eugenio Martorana; Corrado Maria Malaspina; Maria Cristina Aisa; Maria Napoletano; Emanuele Orlandi; Valeria Rondoni; Pietro Scialpi; Diamante Pacchiarini; Diego Palladino; Michele Dragone; Giancarlo Di Renzo; Annalisa Simeone; Giampaolo Bianchi; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 8.  Round table: arguments in supporting abbreviated or biparametric MRI of the prostate protocol.

Authors:  Michele Scialpi; Eugenio Martorana; Pietro Scialpi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Riccardo Torre; Aldo Di Blasi; Stefano Signore
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

9.  Assessment of the compliance with minimum acceptable technical parameters proposed by PI-RADS v2 guidelines in multiparametric prostate MRI acquisition in tertiary referral hospitals in the Republic of Turkey.

Authors:  Mehmet Coşkun; Ali Fırat Sarp; Şebnem Karasu; Mustafa Fazıl Gelal; Barış Türkbey
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  18F-Choline PET/mpMRI for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Part 2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Christine L Barnett; Matthew S Davenport; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Brian T Denton; Morand Piert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.