Literature DB >> 28727221

Scar formation following excisional and burn injuries in a red Duroc pig model.

Britani N Blackstone1, Jayne Y Kim2, Kevin L McFarland3, Chandan K Sen4, Dorothy M Supp3,5, J Kevin Bailey6, Heather M Powell1,2.   

Abstract

Scar research is challenging because rodents do not naturally form excessive scars, and burn depth, size, and location cannot be controlled in human longitudinal studies. The female, red Duroc pig model has been shown to form robust scars with biological and anatomical similarities to human hypertrophic scars. To more closely mimic the mode of injury, recreate the complex chemical milieu of the burn wound environment and enhance scar development, an animal model of excessive burn-induced scarring was developed and compared with the more commonly used model, which involves excisional wounds created via dermatome. Standardized, full-thickness thermal wounds were created on the dorsum of female, red Duroc pigs. Wounds for the dermatome model were created using two different total dermatome settings: ∼1.5 mm and ≥ 1.9 mm. Results from analysis over 150 days showed that burn wounds healed at much slower rate and contracted more significantly than dermatome wounds of both settings. The burn scars were hairless, had mixed pigmentation, and displayed fourfold and twofold greater excess erythema values, respectively, compared with ∼1.5 mm and ≥ 1.9 mm deep dermatome injuries. Burn scars were less elastic, less pliable, and weaker than scars resulting from excisional injuries. Decorin and versican gene expression levels were elevated in the burn group at day 150 compared with both dermatome groups. In addition, transforming growth factor-beta 1 was significantly up-regulated in the burn group vs. the ∼1.5 mm deep dermatome group at all time points, and expression remained significantly elevated vs. both dermatome groups at day 150. Compared with scars from dermatome wounds, the burn scar model described here demonstrates greater similarity to human hypertrophic scar. Thus, this burn scar model may provide an improved platform for studying the pathophysiology of burn-related hypertrophic scarring, investigating current anti-scar therapies, and development of new strategies with greater clinical benefit.
© 2017 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28727221      PMCID: PMC5690826          DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  45 in total

1.  A light microscopic and immunohistochemical evaluation of scars.

Authors:  Nandan V Kamath; Adrian Ormsby; Wilma F Bergfeld; Nancy S House
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.587

2.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Keloids and hypertrophic scars of Caucasians show distinctive morphologic and immunophenotypic profiles.

Authors:  M Santucci; L Borgognoni; U M Reali; G Gabbiani
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Hypertrophic scar, wound contraction and hyper-hypopigmentation.

Authors:  Loren H Engrav; Warren L Garner; Edward E Tredget
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Preliminary observations on fractional ablative resurfacing devices: clinical impressions.

Authors:  Jill Waibel; Kenneth Beer; Vic Narurkar; Tina Alster
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.114

6.  Immediate tangential excision accelerates wound closure but does not reduce scarring of mid-dermal porcine burns.

Authors:  L K Macri; A J Singer; S A McClain; L Crawford; A Prasad; J Kohn; R A F Clark
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-03-31

7.  Epidermis promotes dermal fibrosis: role in the pathogenesis of hypertrophic scars.

Authors:  Judith Bellemare; Charles J Roberge; Danielle Bergeron; Carlos A Lopez-Vallé; Michel Roy; Véronique J Moulin
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Epidermal participation in post-burn hypertrophic scar development.

Authors:  T E Hakvoort; V Altun; R S Ramrattan; T H van der Kwast; R Benner; P P van Zuijlen; A F Vloemans; E P Prens
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Delayed appearance of decorin in healing burn scars.

Authors:  K Sayani; C M Dodd; B Nedelec; Y J Shen; A Ghahary; E E Tredget; P G Scott
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Further similarities between cutaneous scarring in the female, red Duroc pig and human hypertrophic scarring.

Authors:  Kathy Q Zhu; Loren H Engrav; Richard N Tamura; Jana A Cole; Pornprom Muangman; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.744

View more
  8 in total

1.  Incorporation of 3D stereophotogrammetry as a reliable method for assessing scar volume in standard clinical practice.

Authors:  Mitchell Peake; Kristen Pan; R Maxwell Rotatori; Heather Powell; Laura Fowler; Laura James; Elizabeth Dale
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Pre-Clinical Assessment of Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy During In Vivo Porcine Wound Healing.

Authors:  Varuni R Brownhill; Elizabeth Huddleston; Andrea Bell; Jeffrey Hart; Iain Webster; Matthew J Hardman; Holly N Wilkinson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Accelerated Wound Closure of Deep Partial Thickness Burns with Acellular Fish Skin Graft.

Authors:  Randolph Stone; Emily C Saathoff; David A Larson; John T Wall; Nathan A Wienandt; Skuli Magnusson; Hilmar Kjartansson; Shanmugasundaram Natesan; Robert J Christy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  A novel mouse wound model for scar tissue formation in abdominal muscle wall.

Authors:  Shiro Jimi; Arman Saparov; Seiko Koizumi; Motoyasu Miyazaki; Satoshi Takagi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model.

Authors:  Jie Li; Sally Kiu-Huen Ng; Wenjing Xi; Zheng Zhang; Xiaodian Wang; Hua Li; Weijie Su; Jingyan Wang; Yixin Zhang
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 6.  A Systematic Review Comparing Animal and Human Scarring Models.

Authors:  Riyam Mistry; Mark Veres; Fadi Issa
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 7.  In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stefan Rössler; Sebastian Philipp Nischwitz; Hanna Luze; Judith C J Holzer-Geissler; Robert Zrim; Lars-Peter Kamolz
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.948

8.  Early cessation of pressure garment therapy results in scar contraction and thickening.

Authors:  Danielle M DeBruler; Jacob C Zbinden; Molly E Baumann; Britani N Blackstone; Megan M Malara; J Kevin Bailey; Dorothy M Supp; Heather M Powell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.