Literature DB >> 28726609

Influenza D Virus in Animal Species in Guangdong Province, Southern China.

Shao-Lun Zhai, He Zhang, Sheng-Nan Chen, Xia Zhou, Tao Lin, Runxia Liu, Dian-Hong Lv, Xiao-Hui Wen, Wen-Kang Wei, Dan Wang, Feng Li.   

Abstract

Molecular tests revealed influenza D viruses of D/OK lineage widely circulating in farmed animal species in Guangdong Province, southern China. In particular, we found high levels of influenza D virus infection in goats and pigs. We also detected viral RNA in serum specimens and feces of animals with certain severe diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Landrace pigs; Asian buffalo; China; D/OK lineage; Holstein dairy cattle; hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion gene; hybrid goats; influenza; influenza D virus; viruses; yellow cattle; zoonoses

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28726609      PMCID: PMC5547803          DOI: 10.3201/eid2308.170059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Four types of influenza viruses (A–D) have been confirmed (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/viruses/types.htm). The recently discovered influenza D virus is thought to cause respiratory diseases primarily in cattle and to a lesser extent in pigs (–). Moreover, serologic evidence for influenza D virus infection in small ruminants and humans has been established (,). Since the initial influenza D virus isolation in the United States in 2011 (), the virus has been reported in China, Mexico, France, Italy, and Japan (–). Genetic analysis of the hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion gene demonstrated that these viruses had 2 distinct lineages, represented by D/OK and D/660 (). Recently, a novel influenza D virus that emerged in Japan has been proposed as the third lineage (). D/OK lineage–related viruses were previously identified in native Luxi yellow cattle in Shandong Province, northern China (). Despite good progress in identifying domestic cattle as the primary reservoir of influenza D virus, we know little about prevalence in other animals. We conducted a study to clarify the origin and transmission dynamics of influenza D virus in goats, buffalo, and pigs as well as farmed cattle.

The Study

In 2016, we collected 607 clinical samples from 4 species of animals with different clinical diseases and 250 nasal swab samples from asymptomatic animals (Table) from 16 farms in 4 cities of Guangdong Province: Guangzhou, Qingyuan, Heyuan, and Jiangmen (Figure 1). In addition, we randomly chose 200 archived Holstein dairy cattle serum samples, 40 per year, from 2011–2015 to investigate possible early RNA distribution of influenza D virus in this region. We used the reverse transcription PCR method and subcloning protocol (Technical Appendix). We performed sequence alignment using ClustalW implemented in DNAStar software (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA), and we conducted phylogenetic analyses based on our obtained sequences and reference truncated sequences (496-bp) of influenza D viruses from GenBank by using MEGA 5.1 software (http://www.megasoftware.net; Technical Appendix Table).
Table

Animal species, location, sample data, and detection rate of influenza D virus, Guangdong Province, China*

Animal species and farmFarm type†Farm locationNo. animalsAge range of animalsSample typeNo. positive/no. samplesDetection rate, %
Holstein dairy cattle







ANot all-in-all-outGuangzhou: Tianhe2,0003–5 yNasal swab14/86‡16.3
A Not all-in-all-outGuangzhou: Tianhe2,0003–5 ySerum10/94‡10.6
B Not all-in-all-outGuangzhou: Luogang8003–6 yNasal swab6/70‡8.57
B Not all-in-all-outGuangzhou: Luogang8003–6 ySerum5/99‡5.05
C
Not all-in-all-out
Guangzhou: Tianhe
175
2–5 y
Nasal swab
1/50§
2
American Landrace pig







D Not all-in-all-outGuangzhou: Huadu20010–15 wksLung4/10‡40
E All-in-all-outHeyuan: Yuancheng1,0005–5 wksNasal swab4/10‡40
E All-in-all-outHeyuan: Yuancheng1,0003–5 wksLung1/8‡12.5
F All-in-all-outJiangmen: Kaiping8008–20 wksNasal swab3/9‡30
F All-in-all-outJiangmen: Kaiping8008–20 wksLung8/27‡29.6
G
All-in-all-out
Heyuan: Dongyuan
600
9–15 wks
Nasal swab
1/50§
2
Native hybrid white goat







H Not all-in-all-outGuangzhou: Zengcheng2000.5–5 ySerum7/25‡28
I
Not all-in-all-out
Guangzhou: Luogang
300
2–4 y
Serum
20/55¶
36.4
Native hybrid black goat







J Not all-in-all-outQingyuan: Jiangkou1501–3 yRectal swab1/8#12.5
K
Not all-in-all-out
Jiangmen: Enping
500
1–4 y
Nasal swab
0/50§
0
Asian buffalo







L Not all-in-all-outGuangzhou: Nansha1503–5 ySerum2/26¶7.7
M Not all-in-all-outGuangzhou: Panyu1803–6 ySerum1/25¶4
N
Not all-in-all-out
Qingyuan: Yingde
400
1–4 y
Nasal swab
0/50§
0
Native yellow cattle







O Not all-in-all-outQingyuan: Qingxin2002–5 yNasal swab4/55‡7.3
P Not all-in-all-outQingyuan: Fogang2301–3 yNasal swab0/50§0

*Feeding type of farms A–G was in captivity (poor biosecurity and high density). Feeding type of farms H–K and N–P was free grazing on the hills in the daytime and in captivity (poor biosecurity and high density) in the nighttime. Feeding type of farms L and M was free grazing in wetland in the daytime and in captivity (poor biosecurity and high density) in the nighttime.
†All-in-all-out is a strategy for the control of infectious disease. The barn is emptied of all animals and the accommodation is cleaned and disinfected and then refilled, all on 1 day.
‡These animals had severe respiratory diseases with a 10%–30% mortality rate, mainly characterized by expiratory dyspnea and abdominal respiration.
§These animals were asymptomatic.
¶These animals had severe reproductive disorders with a 60%–70% abortion rate.
#These animals had severe diarrheal disease, characterized by watery diarrhea, limb weakness, and nearly dying.

Figure 1

Farm locations for study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs, Guangdong Province, China.

*Feeding type of farms A–G was in captivity (poor biosecurity and high density). Feeding type of farms H–K and N–P was free grazing on the hills in the daytime and in captivity (poor biosecurity and high density) in the nighttime. Feeding type of farms L and M was free grazing in wetland in the daytime and in captivity (poor biosecurity and high density) in the nighttime.
†All-in-all-out is a strategy for the control of infectious disease. The barn is emptied of all animals and the accommodation is cleaned and disinfected and then refilled, all on 1 day.
‡These animals had severe respiratory diseases with a 10%–30% mortality rate, mainly characterized by expiratory dyspnea and abdominal respiration.
§These animals were asymptomatic.
¶These animals had severe reproductive disorders with a 60%–70% abortion rate.
#These animals had severe diarrheal disease, characterized by watery diarrhea, limb weakness, and nearly dying. Farm locations for study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs, Guangdong Province, China. After testing by reverse transcription PCR with further sequencing confirmation, we found influenza D virus–positive rates in 230 total nasal swab samples of 12.8% (20/156) for dairy cattle, 7.3% (4/55) for native yellow cattle, and 36.8% (7/19) for pigs. Rates in 324 total serum samples were 7.8% (15/193) for dairy cattle, 5.9% (3/51) for buffalo, and 33.8% (27/80) for goats. The influenza D virus–positive rate was also high (28.9%, 13/45) in swine lung samples. In contrast, we found no or low prevalence (<2%) in asymptomatic animals tested (Table). Moreover, all of the archived serum samples were found to be influenza D virus negative. Interestingly, 1 of 8 rectal swabs of goats with severe diarrhea tested positive (Table). Samples from animals with reproductive problems had a positive rate of 4.3% (5/116) (Table). Sequence alignment analysis showed that the nucleotide sequences of influenza D viruses found in this study shared high similarity (99%–100%) with previously described sequences from China () and low similarity (93.8%–98.8%) with sequences originating from the United States, France, Italy, Mexico, and Japan (,–). Similarly, phylogenetic analysis revealed that all influenza D virus sequences in this study clustered together with previous sequences from China and belonged to the D/OK lineage (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Phylogenetic analysis of viruses from study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs in Guangdong Province and neighboring provinces, China, compared with reference viruses. Partial hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion gene sequences (496 bp) were aligned by using ClustalW implemented in DNAStar software (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA), and the phylogenetic tree was obtained using neighbor-joining method within MEGA 5.1 software (http://www.megasoftware.net). Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeated analyses (1,000 times) to generate majority consensus tree. Only bootstrap scores of at least 50 were retained. Scale bar indicates 0.5% nucleotide sequence divergence. Gray shading indicates viruses from this study; reference viruses obtained from the United States are marked with ♦; from China, ■; from Italy, ▲; from Mexico, ▼; from France, □; and from Japan ●. Note that D/swine/Guangdong/YS1/2016 and D/swine/Guangdong/YS2/2016 are from the same farm; D/swine/Guangdong/P8/2016 and D/swine/Guangdong/P14/2016 are from the same farm; D/swine/Guangdong/U1/2016 and D/swine/Guangdong/U16/2016 are from the same farm; D/bovine/Guangdong/LG2/2016, D/bovine/Guangdong/LG5/2016 and D/bovine/Guangdong/LG9/2016 are from the same farm; D/bovine/Guangdong/QQ1/2016, D/bovine/Guangdong/QQ4/2016, D/bovine/Guangdong/QQ7/2016 and D/bovine/Guangdong/QQ12/2016 are from the same farm; D/bovine/Guangdong/RS1/2016 and D/bovine/Guangdong/RS4/2016 are from the same farm.

Phylogenetic analysis of viruses from study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs in Guangdong Province and neighboring provinces, China, compared with reference viruses. Partial hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion gene sequences (496 bp) were aligned by using ClustalW implemented in DNAStar software (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA), and the phylogenetic tree was obtained using neighbor-joining method within MEGA 5.1 software (http://www.megasoftware.net). Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeated analyses (1,000 times) to generate majority consensus tree. Only bootstrap scores of at least 50 were retained. Scale bar indicates 0.5% nucleotide sequence divergence. Gray shading indicates viruses from this study; reference viruses obtained from the United States are marked with ♦; from China, ■; from Italy, ▲; from Mexico, ▼; from France, □; and from Japan ●. Note that D/swine/Guangdong/YS1/2016 and D/swine/Guangdong/YS2/2016 are from the same farm; D/swine/Guangdong/P8/2016 and D/swine/Guangdong/P14/2016 are from the same farm; D/swine/Guangdong/U1/2016 and D/swine/Guangdong/U16/2016 are from the same farm; D/bovine/Guangdong/LG2/2016, D/bovine/Guangdong/LG5/2016 and D/bovine/Guangdong/LG9/2016 are from the same farm; D/bovine/Guangdong/QQ1/2016, D/bovine/Guangdong/QQ4/2016, D/bovine/Guangdong/QQ7/2016 and D/bovine/Guangdong/QQ12/2016 are from the same farm; D/bovine/Guangdong/RS1/2016 and D/bovine/Guangdong/RS4/2016 are from the same farm.

Conclusions

When first discovered, influenza D virus was reported in diseased pigs in the United States (). Later, it was identified in cattle and swine herds in several other countries, with or without clinical manifestation (–). Moreover, antibodies to influenza D virus were detected in goats, sheep, and humans (–). Under experimental conditions, influenza D virus replicated and transmitted among ferrets and guinea pigs (). We confirmed that influenza D virus is widely present in cattle species (dairy cattle, yellow cattle, and buffalo). We also found influenza D virus at a high prevalence (>30%) in pigs and goats (Table), which is in contrast to the low prevalence found in previous investigations (,,). The high prevalence may be caused by poor biosecurity measures and high-density feeding mode practices in China’s animal industry as well as possible cross-species transmission (). Taken together, our findings expand the host range of influenza D virus and further emphasize the health concern this virus poses to multiple animal species. Previous studies have shown that influenza D viruses are mainly found in respiratory tract samples (–,,–) and that they have played an etiologic role in bovine respiratory diseases (–). In this study, we found that influenza D virus RNA was present in cattle and goat serum samples; it was also present in goat rectal swabs, accompanied by peste des petits ruminants virus and caprine kobuvirus (data not shown). The distribution of influenza D virus in our study is not the same as that described under experimental conditions (). Influenza viremia, an indicator of disease severity (), has been detected in 20.9% of severe cases during the acute phase of infection or before host death. Our detection of influenza D virus genome in serum samples from severely diseased animals (Table) implies that the virus could enter transiently into the animal’s circulatory system through capillaries lining the respiratory tract, which further contributes to the possibility of detecting virus in other organs. Similar to previous studies (,), we also found that the reverse transcription PCR positive rate was significantly higher (4%–40%) in diseased animals than the rate (<2%) observed in asymptomatic animals (p<0.05), which suggests a potential correlation between the disease severity and presence of influenza D virus. For influenza D virus found in rectal swabs, it might be that animals have swallowed the virus. Another possibility is that, similar to influenza A and B viruses, influenza D virus can replicate within the intestinal tract (). We detected influenza D virus in cattle with reproductive disorders. However, we could not determine whether influenza D virus is associated with reproductive problems. Future studies can be designed to investigate these scientific issues. To date, 2 lineages of influenza D virus (D/OK and D/660) co-circulate in North America and Europe (–,). However, only the D/OK lineage has been found in China, and a potential third lineage was found in Japan (,). Our study confirms and further extends the previous observation that D/OK lineage circulates in East Asia. The viral, host, and ecologic factors that shape the observed contrasting phylodynamics of influenza D viruses among different geographic regions warrant further investigation. In addition, we found different minor genetic variants circulating on the same farm (Figure 2), indicating the ongoing evolution of influenza D viruses in their hosts (,,). In comparing our sequences to the reference sequences from different animal species, we found 4 frequent nucleotide mutations (at positions 136, 231, 263, and 486) (online Technical Appendix Figure 1), which caused 2 amino acid mutations at positions 77 and 88 (online Technical Appendix Figure 2). Interestingly, among 4 nucleotide mutations, 1 unique nucleotide (T at position 486) was originally from the D/660 lineage. Moreover, we found several consistent sequences co-circulating in multiple animal species (online Technical Appendix Figure 1). Our speculation is that homologous recombination among different influenza D viruses and potential cross-species transmission under field conditions are possible, but further study is needed. In summary, our study investigating the infection status of influenza D virus in different farmed animal species in Guangdong Province provides novel insights into the epidemiology and evolution of this virus. In particular, we document the molecular evidence for influenza D virus infection in goats and buffalo.

Technical Appendix

RT-PCR method and subcloning protocol used in study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs, Guangdong Province and neighboring provinces, China.
  15 in total

1.  Identification of a potential novel type of influenza virus in Bovine in China.

Authors:  Wen-Ming Jiang; Su-Chun Wang; Cheng Peng; Jian-Min Yu; Qing-Ye Zhuang; Guang-Yu Hou; Shuo Liu; Jin-Ping Li; Ji-Ming Chen
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.332

2.  Replication and Transmission of the Novel Bovine Influenza D Virus in a Guinea Pig Model.

Authors:  Chithra Sreenivasan; Milton Thomas; Zizhang Sheng; Ben M Hause; Emily A Collin; David E B Knudsen; Angela Pillatzki; Eric Nelson; Dan Wang; Radhey S Kaushik; Feng Li
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Serological evidence for the presence of influenza D virus in small ruminants.

Authors:  Megan Quast; Chithra Sreenivasan; Gabriel Sexton; Hunter Nedland; Aaron Singrey; Linda Fawcett; Grant Miller; Dale Lauer; Shauna Voss; Stacy Pollock; Cristina W Cunha; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Eric Nelson; Feng Li
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Long-term detection of seasonal influenza RNA in faeces and intestine.

Authors:  R Hirose; T Daidoji; Y Naito; Y Watanabe; Y Arai; T Oda; H Konishi; M Yamawaki; Y Itoh; T Nakaya
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Clinical and virological factors associated with viremia in pandemic influenza A/H1N1/2009 virus infection.

Authors:  Herman Tse; Kelvin K W To; Xi Wen; Honglin Chen; Kwok-Hung Chan; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Iris W S Li; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Influenza D virus in cattle, France, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Mariette F Ducatez; Claire Pelletier; Gilles Meyer
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Influenza D Virus Infection in Herd of Cattle, Japan.

Authors:  Shin Murakami; Maiko Endoh; Tomoya Kobayashi; Akiko Takenaka-Uema; James K Chambers; Kazuyuki Uchida; Masugi Nishihara; Benjamin Hause; Taisuke Horimoto
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Isolation of a novel swine influenza virus from Oklahoma in 2011 which is distantly related to human influenza C viruses.

Authors:  Ben M Hause; Mariette Ducatez; Emily A Collin; Zhiguang Ran; Runxia Liu; Zizhang Sheng; Anibal Armien; Bryan Kaplan; Suvobrata Chakravarty; Adam D Hoppe; Richard J Webby; Randy R Simonson; Feng Li
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Detection of Influenza D Virus among Swine and Cattle, Italy.

Authors:  Chiara Chiapponi; Silvia Faccini; Aurora De Mattia; Laura Baioni; Ilaria Barbieri; Carlo Rosignoli; Arrigo Nigrelli; Emanuela Foni
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Influenza D virus infection in Mississippi beef cattle.

Authors:  Lucas Ferguson; Laura Eckard; William B Epperson; Li-Ping Long; David Smith; Carla Huston; Suzanne Genova; Richard Webby; Xiu-Feng Wan
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.616

View more
  39 in total

1.  Murine Model for the Study of Influenza D Virus.

Authors:  J Oliva; J Mettier; L Sedano; M Delverdier; N Bourgès-Abella; B Hause; J Loupias; I Pardo; C Bleuart; P J Bordignon; E Meunier; R Le Goffic; G Meyer; M F Ducatez
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  A DNA Vaccine Expressing Consensus Hemagglutinin-Esterase Fusion Protein Protected Guinea Pigs from Infection by Two Lineages of Influenza D Virus.

Authors:  Yanmin Wan; Guobin Kang; Chithra Sreenivasan; Lance Daharsh; Junfeng Zhang; Wenjin Fan; Dan Wang; Hideaki Moriyama; Feng Li; Qingsheng Li
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Development and Characterization of a Reverse-Genetics System for Influenza D Virus.

Authors:  Jieshi Yu; Runxia Liu; Bin Zhou; Tsui-Wen Chou; Elodie Ghedin; Zizhang Sheng; Rongyuan Gao; Shao-Lun Zhai; Dan Wang; Feng Li
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Limited Cross-Protection Provided by Prior Infection Contributes to High Prevalence of Influenza D Viruses in Cattle.

Authors:  Xiu-Feng Wan; Lucas Ferguson; Justine Oliva; Adam Rubrum; Laura Eckard; Xiaojian Zhang; Amelia R Woolums; Adrien Lion; Gilles Meyer; Shin Murakami; Wenjun Ma; Taisuke Horimoto; Richard Webby; Mariette F Ducatez; William Epperson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Pathogenesis of co-infections of influenza D virus and Mannheimia haemolytica in cattle.

Authors:  Xiaojian Zhang; Caitlyn Outlaw; Alicia K Olivier; Amelia Woolums; William Epperson; Xiu-Feng Wan
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Experimental Infection of Horses with Influenza D Virus.

Authors:  Chithra C Sreenivasan; Tirth Uprety; Stephanie E Reedy; Gun Temeeyasen; Ben M Hause; Dan Wang; Feng Li; Thomas M Chambers
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 7.  Influenza Virus Infections in Polarized Cells.

Authors:  Beatriz Praena; Xiu-Feng Wan
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.818

8.  Influenza D virus diverges from its related influenza C virus in the recognition of 9-O-acetylated N-acetyl- or N-glycolyl-neuraminic acid-containing glycan receptors.

Authors:  Runxia Liu; Chithra Sreenivasan; Hai Yu; Zizhang Sheng; Simon J Newkirk; Wenfeng An; David F Smith; Xi Chen; Dan Wang; Feng Li
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 9.  Host and viral determinants of influenza A virus species specificity.

Authors:  Jason S Long; Bhakti Mistry; Stuart M Haslam; Wendy S Barclay
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 10.  Substantial effect of phytochemical constituents against the pandemic disease influenza-a review.

Authors:  A Brindha Devi; R Sarala
Journal:  Futur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2021-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.