Literature DB >> 28726327

Changing Metrics of Organ Procurement Organization Performance in Order to Increase Organ Donation Rates in the United States.

D Goldberg1,2,3, M J Kallan2, L Fu4, M Ciccarone4, J Ramirez4, P Rosenberg5, J Arnold6, G Segal6, K P Moritsugu7, H Nathan8, R Hasz8, P L Abt9.   

Abstract

The shortage of deceased-donor organs is compounded by donation metrics that fail to account for the total pool of possible donors, leading to ambiguous donor statistics. We sought to assess potential metrics of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) utilizing data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009-2012 and State Inpatient Databases (SIDs) from 2008-2014. A possible donor was defined as a ventilated inpatient death ≤75 years of age, without multi-organ system failure, sepsis, or cancer, whose cause of death was consistent with organ donation. These estimates were compared to patient-level data from chart review from two large OPOs. Among 2,907,658 inpatient deaths from 2009-2012, 96,028 (3.3%) were a "possible deceased-organ donor." The two proposed metrics of OPO performance were: (1) donation percentage (percentage of possible deceased-donors who become actual donors; range: 20.0-57.0%); and (2) organs transplanted per possible donor (range: 0.52-1.74). These metrics allow for comparisons of OPO performance and geographic-level donation rates, and identify areas in greatest need of interventions to improve donation rates. We demonstrate that administrative data can be used to identify possible deceased donors in the US and could be a data source for CMS to implement new OPO performance metrics in a standardized fashion.
© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; donors and donation; donors and donation: deceased; ethics and public policy; law/legislation; organ procurement; organ procurement and allocation; organ procurement organization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28726327     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  15 in total

1.  Offer acceptance practices and geographic variability in allocation model for end-stage liver disease at transplant.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Joshua Pyke; David P Schladt; Sommer E Gentry; Tim Weaver; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Geographic Disparity in Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Rates Following Share 35.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Sheng Zhou; Eric K H Chow; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.

Authors:  Christine E Haugen; Tanveen Ishaque; Abel Sapirstein; Alexander Cauneac; Dorry L Segev; Sommer Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Wide variation in the percentage of donation after circulatory death donors across donor service areas - a potential target for improvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Jesse Y Hsu; Peter P Reese; David Goldberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Important Facts About Organ Donation and OPO Performance.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Teresa Shafer; Laura Siminoff
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Cancer biology as revealed by the research autopsy.

Authors:  Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Chelsea Michael; Priscilla Baez; Rajya Kappagantula; Jody E Hooper; Travis J Hollman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  A three-tier system for evaluation of organ procurement organizations' willingness to pursue and utilize nonideal donor lungs.

Authors:  Samantha E Halpern; Alec McConnell; Sarah B Peskoe; Vignesh Raman; Oliver K Jawitz; Ashley Y Choi; Megan L Neely; Scott M Palmer; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Geographic Differences in Population Health and Expected Organ Supply in the Gulf Coast Region of the United States Compared to Non-Gulf States.

Authors:  Rhiannon D Reed; Brittany A Shelton; Margaux N Mustian; Paul A MacLennan; Deirdre Sawinski; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.385

9.  The volume-outcomes relationship in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.

Authors:  Aaron M Delman; Kevin M Turner; Allison M Ammann; Emily Schepers; Dennis M Vaysburg; Alex R Cortez; Robert M Van Haren; Greg C Wilson; Shimul A Shah; Ralph C Quillin
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.456

10.  Wide Variation in the Percentage of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Across Donor Service Areas: A Potential Target for Improvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Jesse Y Hsu; Peter P Reese; David S Goldberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.385

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.