Literature DB >> 28725243

Outcomes of salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for isolated vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer.

Shuhei Sekii1, Naoya Murakami1, Tomoyasu Kato2, Ken Harada1, Mayuka Kitaguchi1, Kana Takahashi1, Koji Inaba1, Hiroshi Igaki1, Yoshinori Ito1, Ryohei Sasaki3, Jun Itami1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to retrospectively analyze outcomes of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in patients with vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma, and to identify factors prognostic of patient outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent HDR brachytherapy for initial recurrence in the vagina of endometrial cancer after definitive surgery between 1992 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent either intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) or interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) with or without EBRT. Late toxicity was graded using the EORTC (LENT/SOMA) scale, revised in 1995.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were identified. The median follow-up time was 48 months (range: 6-225 months). Of these 37 patients, 23 underwent ICBT, 14 underwent ISBT, and 26 underwent EBRT. Tumor size at first examination of initial relapse was significantly larger in the ISBT than in the ICBT group. The 4-year respective overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the entire cohort were 81.0%, 77.9%, and 56.8%, respectively. The interval between diagnosis of first recurrence and radiotherapy (< 3 months, ≥ 3 months) was a significant predictor of LC and PFS. OS and LC rates did not differ significantly in the ICBT and ISBT groups. Two patients experienced grade 2 rectal bleeding, and four experienced grade 2 hematuria. No grade 3 or higher late complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage HDR brachytherapy is an optimal for treating vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma with acceptable morbidity. Early radiotherapy, including brachytherapy, should be considered for women who experience vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial cancer; high-dose-rate brachytherapy; vaginal recurrence

Year:  2017        PMID: 28725243      PMCID: PMC5509978          DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.67755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy        ISSN: 2081-2841


Purpose

Endometrial cancer is the second most frequent gynecologic malignancy in Japan [1]. Standard management in Japan includes surgery followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients [2,3]. In contrast, surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy is common in Europe and the United States [4]. The most common site of endometrial carcinoma recurrence is the pelvis, mostly in the vagina [5,6,7,8]. The optimal treatment for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer remains undetermined. To our knowledge, fewer studies have analyzed the effects of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy than of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Until 2008, standard treatment for vaginal recurrence of gynecologic carcinoma in our institution consisted of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Subsequently, our institution introduced interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for thick tumors that cannot be adequately treated by ICBT. This study investigated the outcomes of HDR brachytherapy (ICBT or ISBT), with or without EBRT, for women with vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma, and analyzed factors prognostic of clinical outcomes.

Material and methods

Patients

The medical records of all patients treated with HDR brachytherapy for initial recurrence after definitive surgery of endometrial cancer in the vagina without pelvic nodal involvement at our institution from 1992 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had undergone hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with or without lymph node assessment. Recurrence was confirmed pathologically by biopsy or cytology. Patients with distant metastases at the time of first relapse were excluded. The initial stage was determined according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification, revised in 2009 [9].

Brachytherapy

Prior to 2008, patients underwent ICBT alone, with or without EBRT, with the latter performed at the discretion of the attending physician. After 2008, we introduced a HDR ISBT technique, as described [10,11,12], with or without EBRT. Patients with tumors > 5 mm thick were treated with ISBT, whereas those with tumors ≤ 5 mm thick were treated with ICBT with or without EBRT after 2008. High-dose-rate brachytherapy was performed using a MicroSelectron HDRTM (Nucletron, an Elekta company, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Before 2008, ICBT was planned using orthogonal two-dimensional images. After 2008, both ICBT and ISBT were planned by computed tomography (CT)-guided planning. Before 2008, patients with recurrent tumor invading paracolpial tissues underwent EBRT followed by ICBT. When recurrences were located in the upper and middle thirds of the vagina, clinical target volume (CTV) for both ICBT and ISBT was the gross tumor volume (GTV) and normal vaginal mucosa 2 cm caudal to the GTV. When recurrences involved the distal third of the vagina, the entire vagina was included in the CTV. In both orthogonal radiograph-based plans and the CT-based three-dimensional planned ICBT, the prescribed doses were administered to the vaginal wall at a 5 mm depth from the vaginal surface. A cylinder applicator was used for ICBT, whereas plastic applicators with handmade vaginal mold, a Syed-Neblett perineal template (Best Medical International, Inc., Springfield, VA, USA) or a cylinder was used for ISBT. The minimum dose covering 90% of the CTV (CTV D90) in the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was used as the prescribed dose of ISBT. After 2008, CTV was defined based on the CT image (Aquilion LG, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) taken after applicator insertion, with the patient in the lithotomy position, with information derived from gynecological examination, intra-operative transrectal ultrasound images, and the latest magnetic resonance imaging, if available. Interstitial brachytherapy was delivered twice daily with each fraction 6 hours apart. The cumulative doses were calculated on the basis of EQD2, which were calculated in 2 Gy equivalents using the equation derived from the linear-quadratic model [13]: in which D represents total dose, d represents fraction dose, α represents linear (first-order, dose-dependent) component of cell killing, β represents quadratic (second-order, dose-dependent) component of cell killing (more reparable), and α/β represents the dose at which both components of cell killing are equal. When calculating doses of tumor and normal tissue, α/β was assumed to be 10 Gy and 3 Gy, respectively. The dose from the pelvic side wall boost with central shield was not included.

Analysis

Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were defined as the duration from the first day of whole radiotherapy, until the date of the documented event, censored at the time of last follow-up. Local recurrence was defined as pelvic relapse, including the vagina and regional pelvic lymph nodes. Local recurrence and/or distant metastasis after radiotherapy was diagnosed by gynecological examination, cytology, and CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OS, LC, and PFS rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Analyzed variables included tumor size (< 25 mm vs. ≥ 25 mm), initial FIGO stage, recurrent site (upper and middle vs. lower third of the vagina), initial histologic grade (grade 1/2, grade 3), time interval between surgery and first recurrence (< 1 year vs. ≥ 1 year), time interval between the diagnosis of first recurrence and the start of radiotherapy, radiotherapy schedule (EBRT + brachytherapy vs. brachytherapy alone), brachytherapy modality (ICBT vs. ISBT), and cumulative radiotherapy dose (< 65 Gy vs. ≥ 65 Gy). All tests of hypotheses were conducted at an α level of 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 21.0 (SAS Institute, Tokyo, Japan).

Adverse effects

Acute toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. Late morbidities were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force, Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic scale, revised in 1995 [14,15,16]. Adverse effects were reported as absolute number of events for grade 0 (no side effects) to grade 4 (worst side effects) morbidities. When reirradiation was performed for the second relapse after the brachytherapy for the first recurrence, adverse effects were estimated by the date of the reirradiation. Our study was approved by the institutional ethical review board and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were eligible for our study; their demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of initial treatment are shown in Table 1. Median age at first recurrence was 67 years (range: 43-84 years). Information about initial FIGO stage was not available for one patient, because she had undergone surgery in another country and was referred to our institution without stage information. Initial postoperative treatment included radiotherapy (EBRT) in one patient (48.6 Gy in 27 fractions) and chemotherapy in 11, including four who received adriamycin and cisplatin, four who received paclitaxel and carboplatin, and three who received cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and cisplatin. The interval time from surgery to the first recurrence ranged 2 to 183 months (median – 15 months, mean – 27 months) (Table 2). Median tumor size at initial examination for first recurrence was 12 mm (range, 2-43 mm), 2 mm in the ICBT group, and 26 mm in the ISBT group (p < 0.001). In 30 patients, tumors were involved in the upper and middle thirds of the vagina. In the other seven patients, tumors were localized to the distal third of the vagina. The interval time from the date of diagnosis of first recurrence to the start of radiotherapy ranged from 0.1 to 16.4 months (median – 1.3 months, mean – 2.7 months) (Table 3). After the diagnosis of first recurrence, three patients received chemotherapy, one underwent tumor reduction surgery followed by chemotherapy, and one underwent surgical debulking with intention before radiotherapy. Twenty-three patients received ICBT and 14 received ISBT (Figure 1). EBRT to the pelvic side wall was delivered before or after brachytherapy to 26 patients, with a median dose of 50 Gy (range, 30-50 Gy). Of these 26 patients, 24 received 50 Gy EBRT, with 22 of these 24 adopting a central shield up to a median dose of 40 Gy (range, 20-40 Gy). The median cumulative EQD2 of EBRT and brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence was 62 Gy (range, 40-80 Gy). Fourteen patients received ICBT using orthogonal radiograph-based plans, whereas the other 23 received ICBT or ISBT according to CT-based three-dimensional planning. The median cumulative EQD2 to the tumors was 56 Gy in the ICBT group and 70 Gy in the ISBT group (p < 0.001).
Table 1

Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of primary treatment (n = 37)

FactorPatients (n)
Initial FIGO stage
 122 (59.5%)
 26 (16.2%)
 38 (21.6%)
 ND1 (2.7%)
Histology
 Endometrioid adenocarcinoma30 (81.1%)
 Serous adenocarcinoma2 (5.4%)
 Clear cell adenocarcinoma2 (5.4%)
 Unclassified adenocarcinoma2 (5.4%)
 Unknown1 (2.7%)
Postoperative adjuvant therapy
 Radiotherapy1 (2.7%)
 Chemotherapy11 (29.7%)
 None25 (67.6%)

FIGO – International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ND – no data

Table 2

Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of first recurrence (n = 37)

FactorPatients (n)
Age (years)
 Median67
 Range43-84
Time interval from surgery to recurrence (months)
 Median15
 Range2-183
Site of recurrence
 Upper 2/3 vagina30 (81.1%)
 Lower 1/3 vagina7 (18.9%)
Tumor size (mm)
 Median12
 Range2-43
Table 3

Treatment for recurrence

Treatment for recurrencePatients (n)
Time interval from diagnosis of recurrence to radiotherapy (months)
 Median (range)1.3 (0.1-16.3)
Treatment prior to radiotherapy
 Chemotherapy3 (8.1%)
 Surgery1 (2.7%)
 Surgery + chemotherapy1 (2.7%)
Radiotherapy modality
 ICBT alone9 (24.35%)
 EBRT + ICBT14 (37.8%)
 ISBT alone2 (5.4%)
 EBRT + ISBT12 (32.4%)
EBRT (Gy)
 Median dose (range)50 (30-50)
 Median number of fractions (range)25 (15-25)
Brachytherapy (Gy)
 Median dose (range)24 (12-54)
 Median number of fractions (range)4 (2-9)
Cumulative radiotherapy dose (Gy in EQD2)
 Median dose (range)62 (40-80)

ICBT – intracavitary brachytherapy, ISBT – interstitial brachytherapy, EBRT – external beam radiotherapy, EQD2 – equivalent dose in 2 Gy

Fig. 1

Dose distributions of two brachytherapy modalities: (A) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT), and (B) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT)

Dose distributions of two brachytherapy modalities: (A) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT), and (B) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of primary treatment (n = 37) FIGO – International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ND – no data Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of first recurrence (n = 37) Treatment for recurrence ICBT – intracavitary brachytherapy, ISBT – interstitial brachytherapy, EBRT – external beam radiotherapy, EQD2 – equivalent dose in 2 Gy

Overall survival and local control

The median follow-up time was 48 months (range, 6-225 months). The 4-year OS and LC rates were 81.0% and 77.9%, respectively (Figure 2). Local recurrence in the vagina alone was observed in seven patients, whereas none developed distant metastases simultaneously with local recurrence. Of 7, three patients received reirradiation for the second vaginal relapse. At the last follow-up, 8 patients had died. Of 8, seven died of distant metastases of endometrial carcinoma. The characteristics of patients in the ICBT and ISBT groups are shown in Table 4. The 4-year OS and LC rates were 89.1% and 75.3%, respectively, in the ICBT group, and 68.4% and 85.7%, respectively, in ISBT group, with no significant between group differences in OS (p = 0.11, Figure 3) and LC (p = 0.82, Figure 4) rates.
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (solid line) and local control (dashed line) in the entire patient cohort

Table 4

Demographic and clinical features by brachytherapy modality

ICBT (n = 23)ISBT (n = 14)p value
Age at time of first recurrence
 Median6568.50.77
Initial FIGO stage0.50
 I157
 II, III, IV86
Initial histologic grade0.11
 1, 22110
 324
Site of recurrence0.08
 Upper 2/3 vagina219
 Lower 1/3 vagina25
Tumor size (mm)
 Median (range)2 (2-25)26 (2-43)< 0.001
EBRT for tumor (Gy)
 Median (range)30 (0-50)30 (0-50)0.41
Brachytherapy (Gy)
 Median (range)24 (12-42)24 (12-54)0.43

ICBT – intracavitary brachytherapy, ISBT – interstitial brachytherapy, FIGO – International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, EBRT – external beam radiotherapy

Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival in patients who received intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT, solid line) and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT, dashed line)

Fig. 4

Kaplan-Meier analysis of local control in patients who received intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT, solid line) and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT, dashed line)

Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (solid line) and local control (dashed line) in the entire patient cohort Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival in patients who received intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT, solid line) and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT, dashed line) Kaplan-Meier analysis of local control in patients who received intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT, solid line) and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT, dashed line) Demographic and clinical features by brachytherapy modality ICBT – intracavitary brachytherapy, ISBT – interstitial brachytherapy, FIGO – International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, EBRT – external beam radiotherapy Univariate analysis showed that the time interval between the diagnosis of first recurrence and the start of radiotherapy (< 3 months, ≥ 3 months) significantly affected LC (p = 0.045, Figure 5), but not OS (p = 0.41). Of 6 patients with time intervals ≥ 3 months, three received chemotherapy and one underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy in other hospitals. Tumor size and initial histologic grade were significantly prognostic for OS. The 4-year OS rate was significantly higher in patients with tumors < 25 mm than ≥ 25 mm (86.9% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.004) and in those with initial histologic grade 1/2 than those with grade 3 (88.0% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.002).
Fig. 5

Kaplan-Meier analysis of local control in patients who underwent radiotherapy < 3 months (solid line) and ≥ 3 months (dashed line) after diagnosis of first recurrence

Kaplan-Meier analysis of local control in patients who underwent radiotherapy < 3 months (solid line) and ≥ 3 months (dashed line) after diagnosis of first recurrence Initial FIGO stage, site of recurrence, interval time between surgery and first recurrence, radiotherapy schedule, brachytherapy modality, and cumulative radiotherapy dose (< 65 Gy, ≥ 65 Gy) were not significantly predictive of OS or LC.

Progression-free survival

The 4-year PFS rate was 56.8%. Nine patients experienced distant metastases as the second relapse. Eight developed in lung and 1 in lung, bone, and paraaortic lymph node. The interval time between the diagnosis of the first recurrence and start of radiotherapy was significantly associated with PFS rate (p = 0.023). The 4-year PFS rate was significantly higher in patients with short (< 3 months) than long (≥ 3 months) intervals (65.4% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.023). PFS rate was not significantly associated with tumor size, initial FIGO stage, site of recurrence, histologic grade, time interval between surgery and first recurrence, radiotherapy schedule, brachytherapy modality, and cumulative radiotherapy dose. No patient experienced grade 3 or higher acute toxicity. Late radiotherapy associated complications occurred in 15 patients. Two patients experienced grade 1 vaginal ulceration (superficial ≤ 1 cm2), whereas none developed grade 2 vaginal ulceration (superficial > 1 cm2). Two patients, who received radiation doses to the rectum of 63.7 Gy and 70.2 Gy, developed grade 2 rectal bleeding (occasional > 2/week). Four patients experienced late grade 2 hematuria (intermittent macroscopic), whereas none experienced grade 3 or higher late toxicity.

Discussion

This study showed that salvage HDR brachytherapy, with or without EBRT, resulted in favorable OS and LC for patients with vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. At 4-years, OS, LC, and PFS rates were 81.0%, 77.9%, and 56.8%, respectively. This LC rate compared favorably with that of other large reported series, including one report showing 5-year LC rate of 75% [17]. Long-term follow-up of 20 patients showed that the 10-year cumulative OS and LC rates were 48% and 74%, respectively [18], with estimated 4-year OS and LC rates of approximately 80% and 74%, respectively. Variations in OS and LC were likely due to the small numbers of patients in these studies and differences in radiation modalities. The 5-year LC rate in 22 patients who received HDR brachytherapy was reported to be 100% [19]. The different LC rates reported in our study may be attributed to the proportion (82% vs. 38%) of women who received ICBT and EBRT. OS and LC rates did not differ significantly in the two brachytherapy groups (ICBT vs. ISBT), although larger tumors were included in the ISBT group. Therefore, the disadvantage of larger tumor volume can be overcome by applying ISBT. The 4-year OS and LC in ISBT group were 68.4% and 85.7%, respectively. Few previous reports have evaluated ISBT for vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma. One reported 5-year OS and LC rates of 56% and 70%, respectively [20]. Use of CT or MRI guided ISBT in patients without prior radiotherapy resulted in a 2-year LC rate of 96% [21]. Our results were not inferior to these findings. Interstitial brachytherapy had clinical significance for relatively large tumors with paracolpial extension or located more than 5 mm from the vaginal membrane. Our study showed that the interval time between the diagnosis of first recurrence and the start of radiotherapy (< 3 months vs. ≥ 3 months) was significantly prognostic of LC. Most patients (66.7%) with intervals of ≥ 3 months initially received chemotherapy or surgery for first relapse, delaying the start of salvage radiation treatment. Postoperative brachytherapy with or without EBRT of uterine corpus has been used to treat women in Western countries [22,23]. In contrast, a study by the Japanese Gynecologic Oncologic Group (JGOG2033) showed that OS rate in patients at high to intermediate risk was higher in those who received postoperative chemotherapy than postoperative pelvic radiotherapy [2]. Therefore, most of these patients in Japan with first relapse undergo radiotherapy without concern about reirradiation in Japan, where those with risk factors after hysterectomy are more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy than radiotherapy. Because postoperative therapies differ between Japan and Western countries, our results could not be readily compared with those of Western countries. Pelvic exenteration is also a choice of treatment for recurrence confined to the vagina or the pelvis alone [4], whereas surgery is effective when the recurrence can be resected completely. Although our study did not directly compare radiotherapy with chemotherapy or surgery for first vaginal relapse, the high local control rate obtained with early brachytherapy, with or without EBRT suggests that this modality remains an optimal therapy for isolated vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma, without the need for surgery or chemotherapy. We found that tumor size (< 25 mm vs. ≥ 25 mm) and initial histologic grade (grade 1/2 vs. grade 3) had an impact on OS rate. Because most patients (87.5%) who died of endometrial carcinoma had distant metastases, control of distant metastases is mandatory for patients with large recurrent tumors. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be an option for patients with tumor size ≥ 25 mm. Another study reported that tumor size (≤ 25 mm vs. > 25 mm), extra-vaginal extension, and the stage of initial disease had an impact on OS in 25 patients who received LDR brachytherapy with or without EBRT [24]. Moreover, multivariate analysis in 50 patients, two of whom received EBRT alone, eight of whom received brachytherapy (LDR or HDR) alone, and 40 of whom received both, found that tumor size, histologic grade, and age were significant predictors of OS [25]. A third study reported that histologic grade (grade 1/2 vs. grade 3) and therapy (EBRT plus brachytherapy versus single-modality therapy) were significant predictors of OS [17]. Moreover, univariate analysis of 40 patients who received HDR brachytherapy found that FIGO grade, DNA ploidy, and risk group were significant predictors of OS [26]. None of our patients experienced grade 3 or higher late complication. In contrast, other studies have reported that 10% and 18% of patients experienced grade 3-4 gastrointestinal complications, whereas none experienced grade 3-4 genitourinary complications [19,25]. A larger series reported that 8 of 91 patients (9%) had grade 4 late complications (fistula, bowel obstruction, gastrointestinal bleeding) [17]. Compared with these other reports, we found that gastrointestinal toxicities were less frequent and genitourinary toxicities were of similar frequency. Our study had several limitations, including its retrospective design, small number of patients treated at a single institution, and the clinical heterogeneity of these patients. Moreover, radiotherapy modalities and prescribed doses were varied.

Conclusions

Salvage radiotherapy, consisting of HDR brachytherapy with or without EBRT yielded favorable LC and OS rates for patients with vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma, with acceptable morbidity. Early salvage HDR brachytherapy was optimal treatment. LC and OS rates were similar in patients who underwent ISBT for larger sized tumors, and ICBT for superficial and smaller tumors.
  25 in total

1.  Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  William Creasman
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: a study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project.

Authors:  Megumi Hori; Tomohiro Matsuda; Akiko Shibata; Kota Katanoda; Tomotaka Sobue; Hiroshi Nishimoto
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Definitive radiotherapy in the management of isolated vaginal recurrences of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Lilie L Lin; Perry W Grigsby; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Salvage treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for isolated vaginal endometrial cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Patrick Petignat; Marjory Jolicoeur; Abdulaziz Alobaid; Pierre Drouin; Philippe Gauthier; Diane Provencher; David Donath; Thu Van Nguyen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Late effects of radiation therapy on the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  L R Coia; R J Myerson; J E Tepper
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Salvage High-dose-rate Interstitial Brachytherapy for Pelvic Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Naoya Murakami; Tomoyasu Kato; Yuichiro Miyamoto; Satoshi Nakamura; Akihisa Wakita; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Keisuke Tsuchida; Tairo Kashihara; Kazuma Kobayashi; Ken Harada; Mayuka Kitaguchi; Shuhei Sekii; Kana Takahashi; Rei Umezawa; Koji Inaba; Yoshinori Ito; Hiroshi Igaki; Jun Itami
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Definitive radiotherapy for patients with isolated vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Anuja Jhingran; Thomas W Burke; Patricia J Eifel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Treatment of vaginal recurrences in endometrial carcinoma by high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Bengt Sorbe; Karin Söderström
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2013 for the treatment of uterine body neoplasms.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Ebina; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Mikio Mikami; Satoru Nagase; Nobuo Yaegashi; Yasuhiro Udagawa; Hidenori Kato; Kaneyuki Kubushiro; Kiyoshi Takamatsu; Kazuhiko Ino; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The impact of a vaginal brachytherapy boost to pelvic radiation in stage III endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Adam Huddleston; Sally Zhen; Lihong Qi; Dominique Rash; Gary Leiserowitz; Jyoti Mayadev
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-04-20
View more
  9 in total

1.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Outcomes After Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Endometrial Cancer in Patients With No Prior Adjuvant Therapy: An Institutional Review.

Authors:  Jessica D Arden; Morgan F Gruner; Charles C Vu; Kimberly Marvin; Hong Ye; Sirisha R Nandalur; Zaid Al-Wahab; Jill Gadzinski; Joseph Anthony Rakowski; Jayson Field; Barry Rosen; Maha Saada Jawad
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-09-09

3.  Combined external beam radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy versus vaginal brachytherapy in stage I, intermediate- and high-risk cases of endometrium carcinoma.

Authors:  R A Sunil; Devang Bhavsar; M N Shruthi; U Suryanarayan Kunikullaya; R K Vyas; Ankita Parikh; Maitrik Jayantkumar Mehta; Pooja Nandwani Patel
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-04-30

4.  Usefulness of HE4 protein in differentiation of pelvic masses in woman.

Authors:  Andrzej Brenk; Piotr Bodzek; Mikołaj Baliś; Aleksandra Barbachowska; Iwona Janosz; Anita Olejek
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2019-04-09

5.  A single-institution review of image-guided brachytherapy for vaginal malignancies using customized molded applicators and interstitial needles.

Authors:  Emily Flower; Salman Zanjani; Gemma Busuttil; Emma Sullivan; Wayne Smith; Kathy Tran; David Thwaites; Jennifer Chard; Viet Do
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-12-30

6.  Modified Houdek vault applicator for high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a technical report and case series.

Authors:  Revathy Krishnamurthy; Lavanya Gurram; Yogesh Ghadi; Dheera Aravindhan; Libin Scaria; Satish Kohle; Sudarshan Kadam; Supriya Chopra; Umesh Mahantshetty
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-12-30

7.  Prospective observational study on the safety of an original fiducial marker insertion for radiotherapy in gynecological cancer by a simple method.

Authors:  Shuhei Sekii; Kayoko Tsujino; Hikaru Kubota; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Kengo Kosaka; Shuichiro Miyazaki; Nor Shazrina Sulaiman; Yoko Matsumoto; Yosuke Ota; Toshinori Soejima; Ryohei Sasaki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Risk factors for fistula formation after interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced gynecological cancers involving vagina.

Authors:  Allen Yen; Zhen Tian; Brian Hrycushko; Kevin Albuquerque
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-12-28

Review 9.  Vaginal toxicity after high-dose-rate endovaginal brachytherapy: 20 years of results.

Authors:  Durim Delishaj; Amelia Barcellini; Romerai D'Amico; Stefano Ursino; Francesco Pasqualetti; Ilaria Costanza Fumagalli; Carlo Pietro Soatti
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-12-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.