| Literature DB >> 33305085 |
Jessica D Arden1, Morgan F Gruner1,2, Charles C Vu1,3, Kimberly Marvin1, Hong Ye1, Sirisha R Nandalur1, Zaid Al-Wahab4, Jill Gadzinski4, Joseph Anthony Rakowski4, Jayson Field4, Barry Rosen4, Maha Saada Jawad1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: After definitive surgery, women with early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer are observed. However, some will require salvage radiation therapy for recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience using salvage radiation for recurrent endometrial cancer in patients who did not receive upfront adjuvant therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-eight women with endometrial cancer who had undergone initial definitive hysterectomy without adjuvant therapy developed isolated local or regional recurrence and were treated with salvage radiation in our department from 2004 to 2018. Salvage radiation included whole pelvic radiation, vaginal brachytherapy, or both. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and toxicities were recorded and analyzed.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33305085 PMCID: PMC7718518 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol ISSN: 2452-1094
Demographics and tumor characteristics of patients who underwent salvage radiation for recurrence of endometrial cancer after initial surgical management with no adjuvant therapy
| Age (years) | |
| Median (range) | 66 (48-85) |
| Follow-up (years, from initial surgery) | |
| Median (range) | 3.0 (0-13.7) |
| Tumor size (cm) | |
| Median (range) | 3.8 (1-8.2) |
| Histology | |
| Endometroid | 20 (71%) |
| Papillary | 1 (4%) |
| Mixed mullerian | 1 (4%) |
| Mucinous | 1 (4%) |
| Mixed | 1 (4%) |
| Unknown | 4 (14%) |
| Grade | |
| I | 17 (61%) |
| II | 5 (18%) |
| III | 5 (18%) |
| Unknown | 1 (4%) |
| FIGO T stage | |
| 1a | 19 (68%) |
| 1b | 7 (25%) |
| 2 | 2 (7%) |
| FIGO stage | |
| IA | 19 (68%) |
| IB | 7 (25%) |
| II | 2 (7%) |
| LVSI | |
| Yes | 3 (11%) |
| No | 23 (82%) |
| Unknown | 2 (7%) |
| Chemotherapy | |
| Yes | 6 (21%) |
| No | 19 (68%) |
| Unknown | 3 (11%) |
| Time from surgery to first recurrence | |
| (years) | 1.7 (0.3-7.8) |
Abbreviations: FIGO = The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; LVSI = lymphovascular space invasion.
Details of salvage radiation treatments at time of recurrence
| Salvage therapy details | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Treatment modality | |
| IC alone | 1 (4%) |
| EBRT alone | 6 (21%) |
| Pelvis and IC | 20 (71%) |
| Pelvis and IS | 1 (4%) |
| RT modality for patients treated with EBRT | |
| 3D CRT | 19 (68%) |
| IMRT | 8 (29%) |
| Midline block used | |
| Yes | 10 (36%) |
| No | 18 (64%) |
| Para-aortic lymph nodes treated | |
| Yes | 3 (11%) |
| No | 25 (89%) |
| Abdomen treated | |
| Yes | 1 (4%) |
| No | 27 (96%) |
| Nodal boost delivered | |
| Yes | 1 (4%) |
| No | 27 (96%) |
Abbreviations: 3D CRT = 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy; BED = biologically effective dose; EBRT = external beam radiation; EQD2 = equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions; IC = intracavitary; IMRT = intensity modulated radiation therapy; IS = interstitial; RT = radiation therapy.
EQD2 and BED calculated at a depth of 0.5 cm for patients who received IC brachytherapy.
Clinical outcomes after salvage therapy, calculated from time of salvage treatment
| 1 year | 2 year | 3 year | 4 year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall survival | 92.6% | 88.4% | 82.9% | 77.3% |
| Disease-free survival | 88.9% | 80.4% | 80.4% | 74.7% |
| Local recurrence | 3.6% | 7.1% | 7.1% | 7.1% |
| Regional recurrence | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Distant metastases | 10.7% | 14.3% | 14.3% | 14.3% |
| Distant metastasis-free survival | 88.9% | 84.7% | 84.7% | 84.7% |
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) (a) and disease-free survival (DFS) (b) after salvage radiation therapy (SRT).
Summary of the literature on salvage therapy for patients with endometrial cancer who experience local and/or regional recurrence after surgical management alone16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26
| Yrs | Pts | Med fu | Pelv fail | Prior RT | Grade 3 | Salvage radiation | Med dose (Gy) | Outcomes | Grade 3-5 toxicities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arden (this work) | 2004- 2018 | 28 | 21 | Yes, 18% | No | 18% | EBRT: 21% | Total: 60.6 | 4y LC 93% | G3: 1 (6%) |
| Sekii et al. | 1992- 2014 | 37 | 48 | No | Yes, 3% | 16% | Brachy: 30% | EQD2: 62 | 4y LC 78% | G3-5: 0 |
| Baek et al. | 1997- 2012 | 43 | 58 | No | Yes, 9% | 12% | Brachy: 60% | EQD2: 69 | 5y LC 78% | G3: 6 (14%) |
| Vargo et al. | 2004- 2013 | 41 | 18 | No | No | 22% | Both: 100% | Total: 76.0 | 3y LC 95% | G3: 1 (2%) |
| Huh et al. | 1975- 2002 | 69 | 63 | No | No | 25% | EBRT: 90% | Not reported | 5y OS 75% | Not reported |
| Petignat et al. | 1997- 2003 | 22 | 32 | No | Yes, 9% | 14% | Brachy: 18% | Not reported | 5y LC 100% | G3: 13 (59%) |
| Lin et al. | 1967- 2003 | 50 | 53 | No | Yes, 22% | 12% | EBRT: 6% | Total: 60 | 5y DFS 68% | G3-4: 5 (10%) |
| Jhingran et al. | 1960- 1997 | 91 | 58 | No | Yes, 37% | 31% | EBRT: 31% | Total: 75 | 5y LC 75% | G3: 3 (3%) |
| Hasbini et al. | 1986- 1999 | 25 | 28 | Yes, 28% | Yes, 28% | 24% | Brachy: 12% | Not reported | 3y OS 48% | G4: 1 (4%) |
| Jereczek-Fossa et al. | 1975- 1995 | 73 | Not reported | Yes | No | 27% | EBRT: 17% | Total: 75.9 | 5y OS 25% | G3: 1 (1%) |
| Nag et al. | 1989- 2000 | 15 | 47 | No | Yes, 53% | Not reported | Brachy: 67% | Not reported | 5y LC 67% | G3: 1 (7%) |
| Sears et al. | 1973- 1991 | 45 | 89 | Yes, 13% | No | 13% | EBRT: 40% | Not reported | 5y LC 54% | G3: 1 (2%) |
The following are outlined for each study: first author and year of publication; the years during which patients were treated (yrs); number of patients included (pts); length of median follow-up in months (med fu); whether patients with pelvic/regional failures were included (pelv fail); whether patients with prior adjuvant radiation therapy were included (prior RT); the percent with grade 3 disease (grade 3); the percent receiving external beam RT alone (EBRT), brachytherapy alone (brachy), or both EBRT and brachy (both); median total radiation dose reported as either total prescribed dose (total) or EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions) (med dose, Gy); clinical outcomes after salvage radiation including local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS); and the number of patients who experienced chronic grade 3 to 5 toxicities (G3-5).