Literature DB >> 28724718

Poor Reliability and Poor Adherence to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Are Common in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and May Be Associated With Poor Pregnancy Outcomes.

Emmanuel Cosson1,2, Baz Baz3, Françoise Gary3, Isabelle Pharisien4, Minh Tuan Nguyen3, Dorian Sandre-Banon3, Yahya Jaber3, Camille Cussac-Pillegand3, Isabela Banu3, Lionel Carbillon4, Paul Valensi3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the compliance with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and the reliability of diabetes logbooks in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), as well as the associated determinants and outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We prospectively selected French-speaking women with newly diagnosed GDM who had been referred to our diabetes management program and understood SMBG principles. At the next follow-up visit, we collected SMBG results from glucose meters and logbooks. We analyzed pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed over 13 ± 3 days in 91 women. Only 61.5% had performed ≥80% of the required tests. Poor compliance was associated with a family history of diabetes, social deprivation, and non-European origin. The average time between pre- and postprandial tests was 141 ± 20 min, with 46.5% of women performing ≥80% of postprandial measurements 100-140 min after meals. Inadequate timing was associated with ethnicity and higher HbA1c at baseline. A total of 23.1% of women had <90% matched values in diary and meter memory, and a poor concordance was associated with a family history of diabetes. Poor adherence was associated with more preeclampsia (12.2 vs. 1.9%, P = 0.049), and inadequate postprandial test timing with a higher HbA1c at delivery (5.3 ± 0.4 vs. 5.0 ± 0.3% [34 ± 2 vs. 31 ± 2 mmol/mol], P < 0.01), despite more frequent insulin therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Although women with GDM are considered to be highly motivated, SMBG adherence and reliability are of concern and may be associated with poor gestational prognosis, suggesting that caregivers should systematically check the glucose meter memory to improve GDM management.
© 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28724718     DOI: 10.2337/dc17-0369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  16 in total

1.  Cellular-Enabled Glucometers and Maternal Glucose Control: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Sarah A Wernimont; Jessica S Sheng; Diedre Fleener; Karen M Summers; Craig Syrop; Janet I Andrews
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-19

2.  Inverse association between 1,5-anhydroglucitol and neonatal diabetic complications.

Authors:  Enav Yefet; Shams Twafra; Neta Shwartz; Noura Hissin; Jamal Hasanein; Raul Colodner; Neetsa Mirsky; Zohar Nachum
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Comparing the Efficacies of Telemedicine and Standard Prenatal Care on Blood Glucose Control in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ying Tian; Suhan Zhang; Feiling Huang; Liangkun Ma
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Impact of Ramadan fasting on glucose levels in women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated with diet alone or diet plus metformin: a continuous glucose monitoring study.

Authors:  Bachar O Afandi; Mohamed M Hassanein; Lina M Majd; Nico J D Nagelkerke
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2017-12-04

5.  Application and Utility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Qi Yu; Izzuddin M Aris; Kok Hian Tan; Ling-Jun Li
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 6.  Compliance and barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sumanta Saha
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2019 May-Jun

7.  The influence of demographic, social-educational determinants and diabetes management on agreement between glucometer and logbook and its impact on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Rebeca Cavalcante; Alessandra S M Matheus; Aneliza Zanette; Bruna Braga; Bruna Duarte; Bruna Würdig; Daniele Maieron; João Scarparo Sorio; Luciana Bagatini; Michelle Cherit; Marilia Brito Gomes
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.320

8.  Determinants of the persistency of macrosomia and shoulder dystocia despite treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Cécile Pénager; Pascal Bardet; José Timsit; Jacques Lepercq
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-04-09

9.  Redesigned Care Delivery for Insulin-Requiring Diabetes in Pregnancy Improves Perinatal Glycemic Control While Reducing Neonatal Intensive Care Admissions, Length of Stay, and Costs.

Authors:  Craig H Syrop; Sarah A Wernimont; Diedre K Fleener; Joseph M Kardos; Linda M Rubenstein; Janet I Andrews
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Comparing the Efficacy of a Mobile Phone-Based Blood Glucose Management System With Standard Clinic Care in Women With Gestational Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lucy Mackillop; Jane Elizabeth Hirst; Katy Jane Bartlett; Jacqueline Susan Birks; Lei Clifton; Andrew J Farmer; Oliver Gibson; Yvonne Kenworthy; Jonathan Cummings Levy; Lise Loerup; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Wai-Kit Ming; Carmelo Velardo; Lionel Tarassenko
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.