Literature DB >> 28720500

Essential slow degrees of freedom in protein-surface simulations: A metadynamics investigation.

Arushi Prakash1, K G Sprenger1, Jim Pfaendtner2.   

Abstract

Many proteins exhibit strong binding affinities to surfaces, with binding energies much greater than thermal fluctuations. When modelling these protein-surface systems with classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, the large forces that exist at the protein/surface interface generally confine the system to a single free energy minimum. Exploring the full conformational space of the protein, especially finding other stable structures, becomes prohibitively expensive. Coupling MD simulations with metadynamics (enhanced sampling) has fast become a common method for sampling the adsorption of such proteins. In this paper, we compare three different flavors of metadynamics, specifically well-tempered, parallel-bias, and parallel-tempering in the well-tempered ensemble, to exhaustively sample the conformational surface-binding landscape of model peptide GGKGG. We investigate the effect of mobile ions and ion charge, as well as the choice of collective variable (CV), on the binding free energy of the peptide. We make the case for explicitly biasing ions to sample the true binding free energy of biomolecules when the ion concentration is high and the binding free energies of the solute and ions are similar. We also make the case for choosing CVs that apply bias to all atoms of the solute to speed up calculations and obtain the maximum possible amount of information about the system.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Adsorption; Metadynamics; Molecular dynamics simulations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28720500     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.07.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  5 in total

1.  Affinity of small-molecule solutes to hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and chemically patterned interfaces in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Jacob I Monroe; Sally Jiao; R Justin Davis; Dennis Robinson Brown; Lynn E Katz; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ligand binding free-energy calculations with funnel metadynamics.

Authors:  Stefano Raniolo; Vittorio Limongelli
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Solid-State NMR and MD Study of the Structure of the Statherin Mutant SNa15 on Mineral Surfaces.

Authors:  Erika L Buckle; Arushi Prakash; Massimiliano Bonomi; Janani Sampath; Jim Pfaendtner; Gary P Drobny
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Transient exposure of a buried phosphorylation site in an autoinhibited protein.

Authors:  Simone Orioli; Carl G Henning Hansen; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Molecular Modeling for Nanomaterial-Biology Interactions: Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Tommaso Casalini; Vittorio Limongelli; Mélanie Schmutz; Claudia Som; Olivier Jordan; Peter Wick; Gerrit Borchard; Giuseppe Perale
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.