Literature DB >> 28718094

Distribution, source analysis, and ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the typical topsoil of the Issyk-Kul Lake Basin.

Wen Liu1, Long Ma2, Jilili Abuduwaili1, Yaoming Li1.   

Abstract

The concentration, distribution, compositional characteristics, and pollution sources of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the topsoil of Issyk-Kul Lake Basin were studied, and their ecological risks were evaluated in this paper. The total concentration of the 16 PAHs was 68.58-475.95 ng g-1, with an average of 134.45 ng g-1. Four-ring PAHs accounted for 43.2% of the total PAHs, two- and three-ring PAHs accounted for 39.4%, and five- and six-ring PAHs accounted for 15.8%. The total concentration of the seven carcinogenic PAHs was 7.66-76.04 ng g-1, with an average of 30.97 ng g-1. An analysis of the PAH sources through diagnostic ratio analysis and principal component analysis was carried out. The results showed that the regional soil PAHs were mainly derived from coal, wood, and grass combustion, while traffic and regional industry also had small contributions to the PAHs. The pollution-free samples accounted for 75% and the slightly polluted samples accounted for 25% based on the total concentration of the 16 PAHs. An ecological risk assessment showed that 26.7% of Ac and 3.3% of Pyr and DahA might occasionally produce ecological risks. The toxicity was calculated on the basis of benzo[a]pyrene, and the toxicity equivalent was between 2.48 and 13.78 ng g-1 with an average of 6.23 ng g-1, which currently does not pose any health risk to human life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic ratio; Ecological risk; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Principal component analysis; Topsoil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28718094     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6113-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  17 in total

1.  Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in thirty typical soil profiles in the Yangtze River Delta region, east China.

Authors:  L F Ping; Y M Luo; H B Zhang; Q B Li; L H Wu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 2.  PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources.

Authors:  Marek Tobiszewski; Jacek Namieśnik
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Spatial distribution and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the reservoir sediments after impoundment of Manwan Dam in the middle of Lancang River, China.

Authors:  NanNan An; Shiliang Liu; Yijie Yin; Fangyan Cheng; Shikui Dong; Xiaoyu Wu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Spatial, temporal, and source variations of hydrocarbons in marine sediments from Baffin Bay, Eastern Canadian Arctic.

Authors:  Karen L Foster; Gary A Stern; Jesse Carrie; Joscelyn N-L Bailey; Peter M Outridge; Hamed Sanei; Robie W Macdonald
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons study and toxic equivalency factor (TEFs) in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  F Halek; Gh Nabi; A Kavousi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban soils of the megacity Shanghai: occurrence, source apportionment and potential human health risk.

Authors:  Xue-Tong Wang; Yi Miao; Yuan Zhang; Yuan-Cheng Li; Ming-Hong Wu; Gang Yu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and black carbon in intertidal sediments of China coastal zones: Concentration, ecological risk, source and their relationship.

Authors:  Xiaofei Li; Lijun Hou; Ye Li; Min Liu; Xianbiao Lin; Lv Cheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  On the use of PAH molecular diagnostic ratios in sewage sludge for the understanding of the PAH sources. Is this use appropriate?

Authors:  Athanasios Katsoyiannis; Eleni Terzi; Quan-Ying Cai
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  I C Nisbet; P K LaGoy
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 10.  Medical hypothesis: xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Davis; H L Bradlow; M Wolff; T Woodruff; D G Hoel; H Anton-Culver
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Distribution, sources, and toxicity assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils of a heavy industrial city, Liuzhou, China.

Authors:  Ying Miao; Xiangsheng Kong; Chengxi Li
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Chemoresistance to Cancer Treatment: Benzo-α-Pyrene as Friend or Foe?

Authors:  Kevin Dzobo; Naseeha Hassen; Dimakatso Alice Senthebane; Nicholas Ekow Thomford; Arielle Rowe; Hendrina Shipanga; Ambroise Wonkam; M Iqbal Parker; Shaheen Mowla; Collet Dandara
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.