Literature DB >> 28717889

Combined arthroscopically assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Carmen Hann1, Natascha Kraus1, Marvin Minkus1, Nina Maziak1, Markus Scheibel2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS: Due to high rate of persisting dynamic posterior translation (DPT) following isolated coracoclavicular double-button technique for reconstruction of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint reported in the literature, an additional acromioclavicular cerclage was added to the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of patients with high-grade AC-joint instability treated with a double TightRope technique with an additional percutaneous acromioclavicular cerclage.
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (6 f/53 m; median age 38.3 (range 21.5-63.4 years) who sustained an acute high-grade AC-joint dislocation (Rockwood type V) were treated using the above-mentioned technique. At the final follow-up, the constant score (CS), the subjective shoulder value (SSV), the Taft score (TF) and the acromioclavicular joint instability score (ACJI) as well as bilateral anteroposterior stress views with 10 kg of axial load and bilateral modified Alexander views were obtained.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 26.4 (range 20.3-61.0) months, 34 patients scored a median of 90 (33-100) points in the CS, 90 (25-100) % in the SSV, 11 (4-12) points in the TF and 87 (43-100) points in the ACJI. The coracoclavicular (CC) distance was 12.1 (6.5-19.8) mm and the CC difference 2.0 (0.0-11.0) mm. Two patients (5.8%) showed a complete DPT of the AC joint, and fourteen patients (41.1%) displayed a partial DPT. The overall revision rate was 11.7%. Two patients presented implant irritation, one patient a recurrent instability, and one patient suffered from a local infection.
CONCLUSION: The arthroscopically assisted and image-intensifier-controlled double TightRope technique with an additional percutaneous acromioclavicular cerclage leads to good and excellent clinical results after a follow-up of 2 years. The incidence of persisting dynamic horizontal translation is lower compared to isolated coracoclavicular stabilization. Thus, we recommend using the double TightRope implant with an additional acromioclavicular cerclage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint dislocation; Acromioclavicular joint instability; Arthroscopic coracoclavicular stabilization; TightRope

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28717889     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4643-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  Gian M Salzmann; Lars Walz; Philip B Schoettle; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  Current state of treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries in Germany: is there a difference between specialists and non-specialists? A survey of German trauma and orthopaedic departments.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Marco M Schneider; Sven Shafizadeh; Holger Bäthis; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Banerjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of 3 stabilization methods on acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Nick Bishop; Sabrina Jauch; Daniel Briem; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Klaus Pueschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Lars G Großterlinden
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study.

Authors:  T N Taft; F C Wilson; J W Oglesby
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Acute dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. Traumatic anatomy and the importance of deltoid and trapezius.

Authors:  A Lizaur; L Marco; R Cebrian
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-07

7.  Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Markus Scheibel; Silvia Dröschel; Christian Gerhardt; Natascha Kraus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  [A new minimally invasive arthroscopic technique for reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  F Elser; B Chernchujit; P Ansah; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  A crook plate for treatment of acromioclavicular joint separation: indication, technique, and results after one year.

Authors:  H Habernek; R Weinstabl; L Schmid; C Fialka
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1993-12

10.  Incidence and causes of shoulder girdle injuries in an urban population.

Authors:  A Nordqvist; C J Petersson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  32 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: an additional acromioclavicular cerclage does not improve horizontal stability in double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Tobias Schöbel; Jean-Pierre Fischer; Sabine Löffler; Georg Osterhoff; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Repair of the entire superior acromioclavicular ligament complex best restores posterior translation and rotational stability.

Authors:  Daichi Morikawa; Felix Dyrna; Mark P Cote; Jeremiah D Johnson; Elifho Obopilwe; Florian B Imhoff; Knut Beitzel; Augustus D Mazzocca; Bastian Scheiderer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Arthroscopic Reconstruction After Acute Acromioclavicular Separation Injuries.

Authors:  Marvin Minkus; Natascha Kraus; Carmen Hann; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2017-03-08

4.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Dislocation of the Acromioclavicular Joint.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Natascha Kraus; Markus Scheibel; Jörg Streich; Arne Venjakob; Dirk Maier
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Shahbaz Malik; Kieran Bentick; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Current aspects and new techniques in dislocation of the shoulder joint].

Authors:  J Abel; M A Zumstein; L Bolliger; M O Schär
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sircana; Maristella F Saccomanno; Fabrizio Mocini; Vincenzo Campana; Piermarco Messinese; Andrea Monteleone; Andrea Salvi; Alessandra Scaini; Almerico Megaro; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Clavicle and coracoid process periprosthetic fractures as late post-operative complications in arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization.

Authors:  Siva Thangaraju; Mark Tauber; Peter Habermeyer; Frank Martetschläger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Long-term stability of coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint separation.

Authors:  A Panagopoulos; E Fandridis; G Delle Rose; R Ranieri; A Castagna; Z T Kokkalis; P Dimakopoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.