Literature DB >> 28716945

Evaluating optimal therapy robustness by virtual expansion of a sample population, with a case study in cancer immunotherapy.

Syndi Barish1, Michael F Ochs1, Eduardo D Sontag2,3, Jana L Gevertz4.   

Abstract

Cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, exhibiting spatial and temporal variations that pose challenges for designing robust therapies. Here, we propose the VEPART (Virtual Expansion of Populations for Analyzing Robustness of Therapies) technique as a platform that integrates experimental data, mathematical modeling, and statistical analyses for identifying robust optimal treatment protocols. VEPART begins with time course experimental data for a sample population, and a mathematical model fit to aggregate data from that sample population. Using nonparametric statistics, the sample population is amplified and used to create a large number of virtual populations. At the final step of VEPART, robustness is assessed by identifying and analyzing the optimal therapy (perhaps restricted to a set of clinically realizable protocols) across each virtual population. As proof of concept, we have applied the VEPART method to study the robustness of treatment response in a mouse model of melanoma subject to treatment with immunostimulatory oncolytic viruses and dendritic cell vaccines. Our analysis (i) showed that every scheduling variant of the experimentally used treatment protocol is fragile (nonrobust) and (ii) discovered an alternative region of dosing space (lower oncolytic virus dose, higher dendritic cell dose) for which a robust optimal protocol exists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer treatment; immunotherapy; mathematical modeling; robust therapies; virotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28716945      PMCID: PMC5547617          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703355114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  55 in total

1.  Determination of a quantitative relationship between hepatic CYP3A5*1/*3 and CYP3A4 expression for use in the prediction of metabolic clearance in virtual populations.

Authors:  Z E Barter; H F Perrett; K Rowland Yeo; D Allorge; M S Lennard; A Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 2.  The memory of a killer T cell: models of CD8(+) T cell differentiation.

Authors:  Bram Gerritsen; Aridaman Pandit
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 5.126

3.  Leveraging prior quantitative knowledge to guide drug development decisions and regulatory science recommendations: impact of FDA pharmacometrics during 2004-2006.

Authors:  Yaning Wang; A Venkatesh Bhattaram; Pravin R Jadhav; Lawrence J Lesko; Rajanikanth Madabushi; J Robert Powell; Wei Qiu; He Sun; Dong S Yim; Jenny J Zheng; Jogarao V S Gobburu
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Regulation of asymmetric division and CD8+ T lymphocyte fate specification by protein kinase Cζ and protein kinase Cλ/ι.

Authors:  Patrick J Metz; Janilyn Arsenio; Boyko Kakaradov; Stephanie H Kim; Kelly A Remedios; Katherine Oakley; Kazunori Akimoto; Shigeo Ohno; Gene W Yeo; John T Chang
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Oncolytic Viruses for Cancer Therapy: Overcoming the Obstacles.

Authors:  Han Hsi Wong; Nicholas R Lemoine; Yaohe Wang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.818

6.  Treatment strategies for combining immunostimulatory oncolytic virus therapeutics with dendritic cell injections.

Authors:  Joanna R Wares; Joseph J Crivelli; Chae-Ok Yun; Il-Kyu Choi; Jana L Gevertz; Peter S Kim
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  Personalising docetaxel and G-CSF schedules in cancer patients by a clinically validated computational model.

Authors:  O Vainas; S Ariad; O Amir; W Mermershtain; V Vainstein; M Kleiman; O Inbar; R Ben-Av; A Mukherjee; S Chan; Z Agur
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Identification of Critical Molecular Components in a Multiscale Cancer Model Based on the Integration of Monte Carlo, Resampling, and ANOVA.

Authors:  Zhihui Wang; Veronika Bordas; Thomas S Deisboeck
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Therapeutic and tumor-specific immunity induced by combination of dendritic cells and oncolytic adenovirus expressing IL-12 and 4-1BBL.

Authors:  Jing-Hua Huang; Song-Nan Zhang; Kyung-Ju Choi; Il-Kyu Choi; Joo-Hang Kim; Min-Geol Lee; Mingul Lee; Hoguen Kim; Chae-Ok Yun
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  Classical mathematical models for description and prediction of experimental tumor growth.

Authors:  Sébastien Benzekry; Clare Lamont; Afshin Beheshti; Amanda Tracz; John M L Ebos; Lynn Hlatky; Philip Hahnfeldt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  12 in total

1.  Optimization of combination therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia with dosing constraints.

Authors:  Helen Moore; Lewis Strauss; Urszula Ledzewicz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 2.  Towards personalized computational oncology: from spatial models of tumour spheroids, to organoids, to tissues.

Authors:  Aleksandra Karolak; Dmitry A Markov; Lisa J McCawley; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Chaos synchronization and Nelder-Mead search for parameter estimation in nonlinear pharmacological systems: Estimating tumor antigenicity in a model of immunotherapy.

Authors:  Nikhil Pillai; Morgan Craig; Aristeidis Dokoumetzidis; Sorell L Schwartz; Robert Bies; Immanuel Freedman
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  From Fitting the Average to Fitting the Individual: A Cautionary Tale for Mathematical Modelers.

Authors:  Michael C Luo; Elpiniki Nikolopoulou; Jana L Gevertz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  How to design preclinical studies in nanomedicine and cell therapy to maximize the prospects of clinical translation.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Betty Y S Kim; Alan Trounson
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 25.671

6.  In silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity.

Authors:  Adrianne L Jenner; Tyler Cassidy; Katia Belaid; Marie-Claude Bourgeois-Daigneault; Morgan Craig
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 13.751

7.  Spatial Model for Oncolytic Virotherapy with Lytic Cycle Delay.

Authors:  Jiantao Zhao; Jianjun Paul Tian
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.871

Review 8.  Fighting Cancer with Mathematics and Viruses.

Authors:  Daniel N Santiago; Johannes P W Heidbuechel; Wendy M Kandell; Rachel Walker; Julie Djeu; Christine E Engeland; Daniel Abate-Daga; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Developing a Minimally Structured Mathematical Model of Cancer Treatment with Oncolytic Viruses and Dendritic Cell Injections.

Authors:  Jana L Gevertz; Joanna R Wares
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Modeling three-dimensional invasive solid tumor growth in heterogeneous microenvironment under chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hang Xie; Yang Jiao; Qihui Fan; Miaomiao Hai; Jiaen Yang; Zhijian Hu; Yue Yang; Jianwei Shuai; Guo Chen; Ruchuan Liu; Liyu Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.