Literature DB >> 28716931

Combining experimental and simulation data of molecular processes via augmented Markov models.

Simon Olsson1, Hao Wu2, Fabian Paul2, Cecilia Clementi3, Frank Noé1.   

Abstract

Accurate mechanistic description of structural changes in biomolecules is an increasingly important topic in structural and chemical biology. Markov models have emerged as a powerful way to approximate the molecular kinetics of large biomolecules while keeping full structural resolution in a divide-and-conquer fashion. However, the accuracy of these models is limited by that of the force fields used to generate the underlying molecular dynamics (MD) simulation data. Whereas the quality of classical MD force fields has improved significantly in recent years, remaining errors in the Boltzmann weights are still on the order of a few [Formula: see text], which may lead to significant discrepancies when comparing to experimentally measured rates or state populations. Here we take the view that simulations using a sufficiently good force-field sample conformations that are valid but have inaccurate weights, yet these weights may be made accurate by incorporating experimental data a posteriori. To do so, we propose augmented Markov models (AMMs), an approach that combines concepts from probability theory and information theory to consistently treat systematic force-field error and statistical errors in simulation and experiment. Our results demonstrate that AMMs can reconcile conflicting results for protein mechanisms obtained by different force fields and correct for a wide range of stationary and dynamical observables even when only equilibrium measurements are incorporated into the estimation process. This approach constitutes a unique avenue to combine experiment and computation into integrative models of biomolecular structure and dynamics.

Keywords:  Markov state models; augmented Markov models; integrative structural biology; maximum entropy; molecular dynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28716931      PMCID: PMC5547628          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704803114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  51 in total

1.  Estimation and uncertainty of reversible Markov models.

Authors:  Benjamin Trendelkamp-Schroer; Hao Wu; Fabian Paul; Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  A Rigorous and Efficient Method To Reweight Very Large Conformational Ensembles Using Average Experimental Data and To Determine Their Relative Information Content.

Authors:  Hoi Tik Alvin Leung; Olivier Bignucolo; Regula Aregger; Sonja A Dames; Adam Mazur; Simon Bernèche; Stephan Grzesiek
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  A thorough dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in ubiquitin.

Authors:  Nils A Lakomek; Teresa Carlomagno; Stefan Becker; Christian Griesinger; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Probability distributions of molecular observables computed from Markov models.

Authors:  Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction.

Authors:  Guillermo Pérez-Hernández; Fabian Paul; Toni Giorgino; Gianni De Fabritiis; Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Determining protein structures by combining semireliable data with atomistic physical models by Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Perez; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  HTMD: High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics for Molecular Discovery.

Authors:  S Doerr; M J Harvey; Frank Noé; G De Fabritiis
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Protein conformational plasticity and complex ligand-binding kinetics explored by atomistic simulations and Markov models.

Authors:  Nuria Plattner; Frank Noé
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Improved cross validation of a static ubiquitin structure derived from high precision residual dipolar couplings measured in a drug-based liquid crystalline phase.

Authors:  Alexander S Maltsev; Alexander Grishaev; Julien Roche; Michael Zasloff; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Modelling proteins' hidden conformations to predict antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Kathryn M Hart; Chris M W Ho; Supratik Dutta; Michael L Gross; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  27 in total

1.  Dynamic graphical models of molecular kinetics.

Authors:  Simon Olsson; Frank Noé
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The dynamic conformational landscape of the protein methyltransferase SETD8.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Rafal P Wiewiora; Fanwang Meng; Nicolas Babault; Anqi Ma; Wenyu Yu; Kun Qian; Hao Hu; Hua Zou; Junyi Wang; Shijie Fan; Gil Blum; Fabio Pittella-Silva; Kyle A Beauchamp; Wolfram Tempel; Hualiang Jiang; Kaixian Chen; Robert J Skene; Yujun George Zheng; Peter J Brown; Jian Jin; Cheng Luo; John D Chodera; Minkui Luo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  A method of incorporating rate constants as kinetic constraints in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Z Faidon Brotzakis; Michele Vendruscolo; Peter G Bolhuis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hybrid Refinement of Heterogeneous Conformational Ensembles Using Spectroscopic Data.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hays; David S Cafiso; Peter M Kasson
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  Refinement of Peptide Conformational Ensembles by 2D IR Spectroscopy: Application to Ala‒Ala‒Ala.

Authors:  Chi-Jui Feng; Balamurugan Dhayalan; Andrei Tokmakoff
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Linking time-series of single-molecule experiments with molecular dynamics simulations by machine learning.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Matsunaga; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Maximum Entropy Framework for Predictive Inference of Cell Population Heterogeneity and Responses in Signaling Networks.

Authors:  Purushottam D Dixit; Eugenia Lyashenko; Mario Niepel; Dennis Vitkup
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 8.  Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Rommie E Amaro; Jerome Baudry; John Chodera; Özlem Demir; J Andrew McCammon; Yinglong Miao; Jeremy C Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Inference of Joint Conformational Distributions from Separately Acquired Experimental Measurements.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hays; Emily Boland; Peter M Kasson
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.475

10.  Reporting on the future of integrative structural biology ORAU workshop.

Authors:  George L Hamilton; Joshua Alper; Hugo Sanabria
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2020-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.