Literature DB >> 28716434

Training Midwives to Perform Basic Obstetric Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Rural Areas Using a Tablet Platform and Mobile Phone Transmission Technology-A WFUMB COE Project.

Sudhir Vinayak1, Joyce Sande2, Harvey Nisenbaum3, Christian Pállson Nolsøe4.   

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a topical subject and can be applied in a variety of ways with differing outcomes. The cost of all diagnostic procedures including obstetric ultrasound examinations is a major factor in the developing world and POCUS is only useful if it can be equated to good outcomes at a lower cost than a routine obstetric examination. The aim of this study was to assess a number of processes including accuracy of images and reports generated by midwives, performance of a tablet-sized ultrasound scanner, training of midwives to complete ultrasounds, teleradiology solution transmissions of images via internet, review of images by a radiologist, communication between midwife and radiologist, use of this technique to identify high-risk patients and improvement of the education and teleradiology model components. The midwives had no previous experience in ultrasound. They were stationed in rural locations where POCUS was available for the first time. After scanning the patients, an interim report was generated by the midwives and sent electronically together with all images to the main hospital for validation. Unique software was used to send lossless images by mobile phone using a modem. Transmission times were short and quality of images transmitted was excellent. All reports were validated by two experienced radiologists in our department and returned to the centers using the same transmission software. The transmission times, quality of scans, quality of reports and other parameters were recorded and monitored. Analysis showed excellent correlation between provisional and validated reports. Reporting accuracy of scans performed by the midwives was 99.63%. Overall flow turnaround time (from patient presentation to validated report) was initially 35 min but reduced to 25 min. The unique mobile phone transmission was faultless and there was no degradation of image quality. We found excellent correlation between final outcomes of the pregnancies and diagnoses on the basis of reports generated by the midwives. Only 1 discrepancy was found in the midwives' reports. Scan results versus actual outcomes revealed 2 discrepancies in the 20 patients identified as high risk. In conclusion, we found that it is valuable to train midwives in POCUS to use an ultrasound tablet device and transmit images and reports via the internet to radiologists for review of accuracy. This focus on the identification of high-risk patients can be valuable in a remote healthcare facility.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-risk pregnancies; Midwives; Obstetrics; Screening; Teamwork; Teleradiology; Training; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28716434     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  17 in total

1.  A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Medical Residents' Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Learning and Stereotypes Following Sonography Student-Led Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training.

Authors:  Christopher J Smith; Tabatha Matthias; Elizabeth Beam; Kathryn Wampler; Lea Pounds; Devin Nickol; Ronald J Shope; Kristy Carlson; Kimberly Michael
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Exploring the availability and impact of antenatal point-of-care ultrasound services in rural and remote communities: A scoping review.

Authors:  Mikaela Doig; Janine Dizon; Katherine Guerrero; Nayana Parange
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-03-12

3.  Comparing the effectiveness of training course formats for point-of-care ultrasound in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Susan Campbell Westerway
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-01-10

4.  Developing a Technology Acceptability and Usage Survey (TAUS) for mHealth Intervention Planning and Evaluation in Nigeria: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kathleen A Lynch; Thomas M Atkinson; Adeleye D Omisore; Olusola Famurewa; Olalekan Olasehinde; Oluwole Odujoko; Olusegun I Alatise; Adedeji Egberongbe; T Peter Kingham; Elizabeth A Morris; Elizabeth Sutton
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Teaching obstetric ultrasound at Mulago Hospital - Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Homa Ahmadzia; Sarah Cigna; Imelda Namagembe; Charles Macri; France Galerneau; Urania Magriples
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sophia Holmlund; Joseph Ntaganira; Kristina Edvardsson; Pham Thi Lan; Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma; Hussein Lesio Kidanto; Matilda Ngarina; Rhonda Small; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Review of Health Economics of Point-of-Care Testing Worldwide and Its Efficacy of Implementation in the Primary Health Care Setting in Remote Australia.

Authors:  Hoi Yan Wong; Loredana G Marcu; Eva Bezak; Nayana Anupam Parange
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-05-06

8.  Testing telediagnostic obstetric ultrasound in Peru: a new horizon in expanding access to prenatal ultrasound.

Authors:  Marika Toscano; Thomas J Marini; Kathryn Drennan; Timothy M Baran; Jonah Kan; Brian Garra; Ann M Dozier; Rafael L Ortega; Rosemary A Quinn; Yu T Zhao; Miguel S Egoavil; Lorena Tamayo; Claudia Carlotto; Benjamin Castaneda
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Point-of-care ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  Florian Recker; Eva Weber; Brigitte Strizek; Ulrich Gembruch; Susan Campbell Westerway; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Obstetric ultrasound: where are we and where are we going?

Authors:  Jacques S Abramowicz
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.