Literature DB >> 28715956

Visual Decision-Making in an Uncertain and Dynamic World.

Joshua I Gold1, Alan A Stocker2.   

Abstract

The right decision today may be the wrong decision tomorrow. We live in a world in which expectations, contingencies, and goals continually evolve and change. Thus, decisions do not occur in isolation but rather are tightly embedded in these streams of temporal dependencies. Accordingly, even relatively straightforward visual decisions must take into account not just the immediate sensory input but also past experiences and future goals and expectations. Here, we evaluate recent progress in understanding how the brain implements these dependencies. We show that visual decision-making relies on mechanisms of evidence accumulation and commitment that have been studied extensively under relatively static, isolated conditions but in general can operate much more flexibly. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms will require identifying the principles that govern this flexibility, which must operate across different timescales to produce effective decisions in uncertain and dynamic environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian decision theory; perception; priors; psychophysics; sequential analysis; signal detection theory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28715956     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci        ISSN: 2374-4642            Impact factor:   6.422


  15 in total

1.  Control of adaptive action selection by secondary motor cortex during flexible visual categorization.

Authors:  Tian-Yi Wang; Jing Liu; Haishan Yao
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Designing and Interpreting Psychophysical Investigations of Cognition.

Authors:  Michael L Waskom; Gouki Okazawa; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Do psychedelics change beliefs?

Authors:  H T McGovern; P Leptourgos; B T Hutchinson; P R Corlett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Tracking the contribution of inductive bias to individualised internal models.

Authors:  Balázs Török; David G Nagy; Mariann Kiss; Karolina Janacsek; Dezső Németh; Gergő Orbán
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  Strategy-dependent effects of working-memory limitations on human perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Kyra Schapiro; Krešimir Josić; Zachary P Kilpatrick; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 6.  Pupil Size as a Window on Neural Substrates of Cognition.

Authors:  Siddhartha Joshi; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Adapting non-invasive human recordings along multiple task-axes shows unfolding of spontaneous and over-trained choice.

Authors:  Timothy Ej Behrens; Miriam C Klein-Flügge; Yu Takagi; Laurence Tudor Hunt; Mark W Woolrich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Tactile angle discriminability improvement: contributions of working memory training and continuous attended sensory input.

Authors:  Wu Wang; Jiajia Yang; Yinghua Yu; Huazhi Li; Yulong Liu; Yiyang Yu; Jiabin Yu; Xiaoyu Tang; Jingjing Yang; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 9.  Context-Sensitive Computational Mechanisms of Decision Making.

Authors:  Manisha Chawla; Krishna P Miyapuram
Journal:  J Exp Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-19

10.  Binocular rivalry reveals an out-of-equilibrium neural dynamics suited for decision-making.

Authors:  Maurizio Mattia; Jochen Braun; Robin Cao; Alexander Pastukhov; Stepan Aleshin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.