Literature DB >> 35731822

Tracking the contribution of inductive bias to individualised internal models.

Balázs Török1,2,3, David G Nagy1,4, Mariann Kiss2,3, Karolina Janacsek5,6, Dezső Németh3,5,7, Gergő Orbán1.   

Abstract

Internal models capture the regularities of the environment and are central to understanding how humans adapt to environmental statistics. In general, the correct internal model is unknown to observers, instead they rely on an approximate model that is continually adapted throughout learning. However, experimenters assume an ideal observer model, which captures stimulus structure but ignores the diverging hypotheses that humans form during learning. We combine non-parametric Bayesian methods and probabilistic programming to infer rich and dynamic individualised internal models from response times. We demonstrate that the approach is capable of characterizing the discrepancy between the internal model maintained by individuals and the ideal observer model and to track the evolution of the contribution of the ideal observer model to the internal model throughout training. In particular, in an implicit visuomotor sequence learning task the identified discrepancy revealed an inductive bias that was consistent across individuals but varied in strength and persistence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35731822      PMCID: PMC9255757          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.779


  65 in total

Review 1.  The neural basis of decision making.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns.

Authors:  J H Howard; D V Howard
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-12

Review 4.  Reinforcement Learning, Fast and Slow.

Authors:  Matthew Botvinick; Sam Ritter; Jane X Wang; Zeb Kurth-Nelson; Charles Blundell; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Computational Precision of Mental Inference as Critical Source of Human Choice Suboptimality.

Authors:  Jan Drugowitsch; Valentin Wyart; Anne-Dominique Devauchelle; Etienne Koechlin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers.

Authors:  Gergo Orbán; József Fiser; Richard N Aslin; Máté Lengyel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cognitive tomography reveals complex, task-independent mental representations.

Authors:  Neil M T Houlsby; Ferenc Huszár; Mohammad M Ghassemi; Gergő Orbán; Daniel M Wolpert; Máté Lengyel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Unreliable evidence: 2 sources of uncertainty during perceptual choice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Michael; Vincent de Gardelle; Alejo Nevado-Holgado; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Tracking the implicit acquisition of nonadjacent transitional probabilities by ERPs.

Authors:  Andrea Kóbor; Kata Horváth; Zsófia Kardos; Ádám Takács; Karolina Janacsek; Valéria Csépe; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

Review 10.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.