| Literature DB >> 28714956 |
Enli Wang1, Pierre Martre2, Zhigan Zhao3,1, Frank Ewert4,5, Andrea Maiorano2, Reimund P Rötter6,7, Bruce A Kimball8, Michael J Ottman9, Gerard W Wall8, Jeffrey W White8, Matthew P Reynolds10, Phillip D Alderman10, Pramod K Aggarwal11, Jakarat Anothai12, Bruno Basso13, Christian Biernath14, Davide Cammarano15, Andrew J Challinor16,17, Giacomo De Sanctis18, Jordi Doltra19, Elias Fereres20,21, Margarita Garcia-Vila20,21, Sebastian Gayler22, Gerrit Hoogenboom12, Leslie A Hunt23, Roberto C Izaurralde24,25, Mohamed Jabloun26, Curtis D Jones24, Kurt C Kersebaum5, Ann-Kristin Koehler16, Leilei Liu27, Christoph Müller28, Soora Naresh Kumar29, Claas Nendel5, Garry O'Leary30, Jørgen E Olesen26, Taru Palosuo31, Eckart Priesack14, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei4, Dominique Ripoche32, Alex C Ruane33, Mikhail A Semenov34, Iurii Shcherbak13, Claudio Stöckle35, Pierre Stratonovitch34, Thilo Streck22, Iwan Supit36, Fulu Tao31,37, Peter Thorburn38, Katharina Waha28, Daniel Wallach39, Zhimin Wang3, Joost Wolf36, Yan Zhu27, Senthold Asseng15.
Abstract
Increasing the accuracy of crop productivity estimates is a key element in planning adaptation strategies to ensure global food security under climate change. Process-based crop models are effective means to project climate impact on crop yield, but have large uncertainty in yield simulations. Here, we show that variations in the mathematical functions currently used to simulate temperature responses of physiological processes in 29 wheat models account for >50% of uncertainty in simulated grain yields for mean growing season temperatures from 14 °C to 33 °C. We derived a set of new temperature response functions that when substituted in four wheat models reduced the error in grain yield simulations across seven global sites with different temperature regimes by 19% to 50% (42% average). We anticipate the improved temperature responses to be a key step to improve modelling of crops under rising temperature and climate change, leading to higher skill of crop yield projections.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28714956 DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2017.102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Plants ISSN: 2055-0278 Impact factor: 15.793