Literature DB >> 28714956

The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

Enli Wang1, Pierre Martre2, Zhigan Zhao3,1, Frank Ewert4,5, Andrea Maiorano2, Reimund P Rötter6,7, Bruce A Kimball8, Michael J Ottman9, Gerard W Wall8, Jeffrey W White8, Matthew P Reynolds10, Phillip D Alderman10, Pramod K Aggarwal11, Jakarat Anothai12, Bruno Basso13, Christian Biernath14, Davide Cammarano15, Andrew J Challinor16,17, Giacomo De Sanctis18, Jordi Doltra19, Elias Fereres20,21, Margarita Garcia-Vila20,21, Sebastian Gayler22, Gerrit Hoogenboom12, Leslie A Hunt23, Roberto C Izaurralde24,25, Mohamed Jabloun26, Curtis D Jones24, Kurt C Kersebaum5, Ann-Kristin Koehler16, Leilei Liu27, Christoph Müller28, Soora Naresh Kumar29, Claas Nendel5, Garry O'Leary30, Jørgen E Olesen26, Taru Palosuo31, Eckart Priesack14, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei4, Dominique Ripoche32, Alex C Ruane33, Mikhail A Semenov34, Iurii Shcherbak13, Claudio Stöckle35, Pierre Stratonovitch34, Thilo Streck22, Iwan Supit36, Fulu Tao31,37, Peter Thorburn38, Katharina Waha28, Daniel Wallach39, Zhimin Wang3, Joost Wolf36, Yan Zhu27, Senthold Asseng15.   

Abstract

Increasing the accuracy of crop productivity estimates is a key element in planning adaptation strategies to ensure global food security under climate change. Process-based crop models are effective means to project climate impact on crop yield, but have large uncertainty in yield simulations. Here, we show that variations in the mathematical functions currently used to simulate temperature responses of physiological processes in 29 wheat models account for >50% of uncertainty in simulated grain yields for mean growing season temperatures from 14 °C to 33 °C. We derived a set of new temperature response functions that when substituted in four wheat models reduced the error in grain yield simulations across seven global sites with different temperature regimes by 19% to 50% (42% average). We anticipate the improved temperature responses to be a key step to improve modelling of crops under rising temperature and climate change, leading to higher skill of crop yield projections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28714956     DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2017.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Plants        ISSN: 2055-0278            Impact factor:   15.793


  16 in total

1.  A Model of Leaf Coordination to Scale-Up Leaf Expansion from the Organ to the Canopy.

Authors:  Pierre Martre; Anaelle Dambreville
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Diversity buffers winegrowing regions from climate change losses.

Authors:  Ignacio Morales-Castilla; Iñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri; Benjamin I Cook; Thierry Lacombe; Amber Parker; Cornelis van Leeuwen; Kimberly A Nicholas; Elizabeth M Wolkovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment.

Authors:  Bin Peng; Kaiyu Guan; Jinyun Tang; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Senthold Asseng; Carl J Bernacchi; Mark Cooper; Evan H Delucia; Joshua W Elliott; Frank Ewert; Robert F Grant; David I Gustafson; Graeme L Hammer; Zhenong Jin; James W Jones; Hyungsuk Kimm; David M Lawrence; Yan Li; Danica L Lombardozzi; Amy Marshall-Colon; Carlos D Messina; Donald R Ort; James C Schnable; C Eduardo Vallejos; Alex Wu; Xinyou Yin; Wang Zhou
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 15.793

4.  Absence of warmth permits epigenetic memory of winter in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Jo Hepworth; Rea L Antoniou-Kourounioti; Rebecca H Bloomer; Catja Selga; Kristina Berggren; Deborah Cox; Barley R Collier Harris; Judith A Irwin; Svante Holm; Torbjörn Säll; Martin Howard; Caroline Dean
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Estimating photosynthetic traits from reflectance spectra: A synthesis of spectral indices, numerical inversion, and partial least square regression.

Authors:  Peng Fu; Katherine Meacham-Hensold; Kaiyu Guan; Jin Wu; Carl Bernacchi
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  Modelling impact of early vigour on wheat yield in dryland regions.

Authors:  Zhigan Zhao; Greg J Rebetzke; Bangyou Zheng; Scott C Chapman; Enli Wang
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Genomic Basis of Transcriptome Dynamics in Rice under Field Conditions.

Authors:  Makoto Kashima; Ryota L Sakamoto; Hiroki Saito; Satoshi Ohkubo; Ayumi Tezuka; Ayumi Deguchi; Yoichi Hashida; Yuko Kurita; Koji Iwayama; Shunsuke Adachi; Atsushi J Nagano
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 8.  Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain.

Authors:  José Luis Araus; Shawn C Kefauver; Mainassara Zaman-Allah; Mike S Olsen; Jill E Cairns
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 9.  Photosynthesis in a Changing Global Climate: Scaling Up and Scaling Down in Crops.

Authors:  Marouane Baslam; Toshiaki Mitsui; Michael Hodges; Eckart Priesack; Matthew T Herritt; Iker Aranjuelo; Álvaro Sanz-Sáez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Local impacts of climate change on winter wheat in Great Britain.

Authors:  Thibaut Putelat; Andrew P Whitmore; Nimai Senapati; Mikhail A Semenov
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.