Literature DB >> 28714545

Focal Hemodynamic Responses in the Stimulated Hemisphere During High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Makii Muthalib1, Pierre Besson1, John Rothwell2, Stéphane Perrey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) using a 4 × 1 electrode montage has been previously shown using modeling and physiological studies to constrain the electric field within the spatial extent of the electrodes. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to determine if functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) neuroimaging can be used to determine a hemodynamic correlate of this 4 × 1 HD-tDCS electric field on the brain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a three session cross-over study design, 13 healthy males received one sham (2 mA, 30 sec) and two real (HD-tDCS-1 and HD-tDCS-2, 2 mA, 10 min) anodal HD-tDCS targeting the left M1 via a 4 × 1 electrode montage (anode on C3 and 4 return electrodes 3.5 cm from anode). The two real HD-tDCS sessions afforded a within-subject replication of the findings. fNIRS was used to measure changes in brain hemodynamics (oxygenated hemoglobin integral-O2 Hbint ) during each 10 min session from two regions of interest (ROIs) in the stimulated left hemisphere that corresponded to "within" (Lin ) and "outside" (Lout ) the spatial extent of the 4 × 1 electrode montage, and two corresponding ROIs (Rin and Rout ) in the right hemisphere.
RESULTS: The ANOVA showed that both real anodal HD-tDCS compared to sham induced a significantly greater O2 Hbint in the Lin than Lout ROIs of the stimulated left hemisphere; while there were no significant differences between the real and sham sessions for the right hemisphere ROIs. Intra-class correlation coefficients showed "fair-to-good" reproducibility for the left stimulated hemisphere ROIs.
CONCLUSIONS: The greater O2 Hbint "within" than "outside" the spatial extent of the 4 × 1 electrode montage represents a hemodynamic correlate of the electrical field distribution, and thus provides a prospective reliable method to determine the dose of stimulation that is necessary to optimize HD-tDCS parameters in various applications.
© 2017 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood flow; electric field; fNIRS; motor cortex stimulation; tDCS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28714545     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  16 in total

1.  Grey-box modeling and hypothesis testing of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based cerebrovascular reactivity to anodal high-definition tDCS in healthy humans.

Authors:  Yashika Arora; Pushpinder Walia; Mitsuhiro Hayashibe; Makii Muthalib; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury; Stephane Perrey; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  How to consider animal data in tDCS safety standards.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Marom Bikson; David Liebetanz; Michael Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases Bilateral Directed Brain Connectivity during Motor-Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface Control.

Authors:  Bryan S Baxter; Bradley J Edelman; Abbas Sohrabpour; Bin He
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  High-definition tDCS of the temporo-parietal cortex enhances access to newly learned words.

Authors:  Garon Perceval; Andrew K Martin; David A Copland; Matti Laine; Marcus Meinzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Direct current stimulation of endothelial monolayers induces a transient and reversible increase in transport due to the electroosmotic effect.

Authors:  Limary M Cancel; Katherin Arias; Marom Bikson; John M Tarbell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Systematic review of combined functional near-infrared spectroscopy and transcranial direct-current stimulation studies.

Authors:  Ronak Patel; Aleksander Dawidziuk; Ara Darzi; Harsimrat Singh; Daniel Richard Leff
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.593

7.  Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Asif Jamil; Giorgi Batsikadze; Hsiao-I Kuo; Raf L J Meesen; Peter Dechent; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Rapid, Dose-Dependent Enhancement of Cerebral Blood Flow by transcranial AC Stimulation in Mouse.

Authors:  Dennis A Turner; Simone Degan; Francesca Galeffi; Stephen Schmidt; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Feasibility of combining functional near-infrared spectroscopy with electroencephalography to identify chronic stroke responders to cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation-a computational modeling and portable neuroimaging methodological study.

Authors:  Zeynab Rezaee; Shashi Ranjan; Dhaval Solanki; Mahasweta Bhattacharya; M V Padma Srivastava; Uttama Lahiri; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Brain Oscillatory and Hemodynamic Activity in a Bimanual Coordination Task Following Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS): A Combined EEG-fNIRS Study.

Authors:  Alisa Berger; Nils H Pixa; Fabian Steinberg; Michael Doppelmayr
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.