Literature DB >> 28712925

Borderline ER-Positive Primary Breast Cancer Gains No Significant Survival Benefit From Endocrine Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tong Chen1, Ning Zhang1, Meena S Moran2, Peng Su3, Bruce G Haffty4, Qifeng Yang5.   

Abstract

Endocrine responsiveness of primary breast cancers with borderline estrogen receptor expression (ER+ [1%-9%]) remains unclear. We aimed at investigating differences in endocrine responsiveness, prognosis, and clinicopathological characteristics between the ER+ (1%-9%) cohort and the ER- cohort or ER+ (≥10%) cohort. Eligible literature published from inception to November 20, 2016 was retrieved from the PubMed database on the basis of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data on survival outcomes were extracted and pooled odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and 2-tailed P values are reported. P values of the χ2 test for comparison of clinicopathological characteristics among included patients in the ER+ (1%-9%) cohort and the other 2 cohorts were calculated respectively. The analysis included 6 studies with 16,606 patients. Significant differences were detected between the ER+ (1%-9%) cohort and the other 2 cohorts on the basis of clinicopathological characteristics respectively. When taking all of the patients into analysis without consideration of treatment modality, the ER+ (1%-9%) cohort presented better prognosis than the ER- group in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (OR, 1.47; P = .046) and 5-year overall survival (OR, 1.23; P = .046). However, patients with ER+ (1%-9%) breast cancer who received endocrine therapy seemed to have a prognosis similar to those without any endocrine therapy (P = .684) and those with ER- carcinoma who received endocrine therapy (P = .145). Patients with ER+ (≥10%) tumors had better endocrine responsiveness compared with their ER+ (1%-9%) counterparts (OR, 0.52; P = .034, ER+ [1%-9%] vs. ER+ [≥10%]). Our results indicate that primary breast cancer patients with ER+ (1%-9%) expression gained no significant survival benefit from endocrine therapy, but manifested overall better prognosis than those with ER- cancer.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borderline estrogen receptor; Breast carcinoma; Endocrine treatment; Immunohistochemical staining; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28712925     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

Review 1.  Insights into Molecular Classifications of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving Patient Selection for Treatment.

Authors:  Ana C Garrido-Castro; Nancy U Lin; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  Inflammatory and other breast cancer incidence rate trends by estrogen receptor status in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2001-2015).

Authors:  Sarah J Aurit; Susan S Devesa; Amr S Soliman; Catherine Schairer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  A 10-miRNA risk score-based prediction model for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Chang Gong; Ziliang Cheng; Yaping Yang; Jun Shen; Yingying Zhu; Li Ling; Wanyi Lin; Zhigang Yu; Zhihua Li; Weige Tan; Chushan Zheng; Wenbo Zheng; Jiajie Zhong; Xiang Zhang; Yunjie Zeng; Qiang Liu; R Stephanie Huang; Andrzej L Komorowski; Eddy S Yang; François Bertucci; Francesco Ricci; Armando Orlandi; Gianluca Franceschini; Kazuaki Takabe; Suzanne Klimberg; Naohiro Ishii; Angela Toss; Mona P Tan; Mathew A Cherian; Erwei Song
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.038

4.  Impact of low versus negative estrogen/progesterone receptor status on clinico-pathologic characteristics and survival outcomes in HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachel Yoder; Bruce F Kimler; Joshua M Staley; Kelsey Schwensen; Yen Y Wang; Karissa Finke; Anne O'Dea; Lauren Nye; Manana Elia; Gregory Crane; Richard McKittrick; Robert Pluenneke; Sheshadri Madhusudhana; Larry Beck; Anuj Shrestha; Larry Corum; Mark Marsico; Shane R Stecklein; Andrew K Godwin; Qamar J Khan; Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 5.  Updates on breast biomarkers.

Authors:  Saleh Najjar; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.535

6.  Borderline Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers in Black and White Women.

Authors:  Halei C Benefield; Emma H Allott; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Charles M Perou; Lisa A Carey; Joseph Geradts; Xuezheng Sun; Benjamin C Calhoun; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Prognostic and predictive parameters in breast pathology: a pathologist's primer.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with poor prognosis in invasive lobular breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Tille; André F Vieira; Caroline Saint-Martin; Lounes Djerroudi; Laëtitia Furhmann; Francois-Clement Bidard; Youlia Kirova; Anne Tardivon; Fabien Reyal; Matthieu Carton; Anne Vincent-Salomon
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 9.  Assessment of estrogen receptor low positive status in breast cancer: Implications for pathologists and oncologists.

Authors:  Nicola Fusco; Moira Ragazzi; Elham Sajjadi; Konstantinos Venetis; Roberto Piciotti; Stefania Morganti; Giacomo Santandrea; Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli; Luca Despini; Marco Invernizzi; Bruna Cerbelli; Cristian Scatena; Carmen Criscitiello
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Independent Prognostic Value of Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immune Response Features by Automated Digital Immunohistochemistry Analysis in Early Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dovile Zilenaite; Allan Rasmusson; Renaldas Augulis; Justinas Besusparis; Aida Laurinaviciene; Benoit Plancoulaine; Valerijus Ostapenko; Arvydas Laurinavicius
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.