Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Dose-response relationships for female radium dial workers.

× No keyword cloud information.

14 in total

1. Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors: Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 11.105

2. Malignant bone tumours: status of aetiological knowledge and needs of epidemiological research.

Authors: R Frentzel-Beyme; G Wagner
Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 1979-07-31

3. A dose-response model for estimating lifetime tumor risks when cell killing occurs.

Authors: B R Scott
Journal: Bull Math Biol Date: 1981 Impact factor: 1.758

4. Radium in drinking water and risk of bone cancer in Ontario youths: a second study and combined analysis.

Authors: M M Finkelstein; N Kreiger
Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 4.402

5. Differential effects of genes of the Rb1 signalling pathway on osteosarcoma incidence and latency in alpha-particle irradiated mice.

Authors: Iria Gonzalez-Vasconcellos; Tanja Domke; Virginija Kuosaite; Irene Esposito; Bahar Sanli-Bonazzi; Michaela Nathrath; Michael J Atkinson; Michael Rosemann
Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 1.925

6. Radiation cancer risk at different dose rates: new dose-rate effectiveness factors derived from revised A-bomb radiation dosimetry data and non-tumor doses.

Authors: Hiroshi Tanooka
Journal: J Radiat Res Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 2.724

7. Radiation, work experience, and cause specific mortality among workers at an energy research laboratory.

Authors: H Checkoway; R M Mathew; C M Shy; J E Watson; W G Tankersley; S H Wolf; J C Smith; S A Fry
Journal: Br J Ind Med Date: 1985-08

8. Radiation hormesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors: T D Luckey
Journal: Dose Response Date: 2006-09-27 Impact factor: 2.658

Review 9. Do non-targeted effects increase or decrease low dose risk in relation to the linear-non-threshold (LNT) model?

Authors: M P Little
Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 2.433

10. Secondary radiation-induced bone tumours demonstrate a high degree of genomic instability predictive of a poor prognosis.

Authors: Christine Rümenapp; Jan Smida; Iria Gonzalez-Vasconcellos; Daniel Baumhoer; Bernard Malfoy; Nabila-Sandra Hadj-Hamou; Bahar Sanli-Bonazzi; Michaela Nathrath; Michael J Atkinson; Michael Rosemann
Journal: Curr Genomics Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.236