| Literature DB >> 28712360 |
Nicaise Tuikue Ndam1,2,3, Emmanuel Mbuba4, Raquel González5,6, Pau Cisteró5, Simon Kariuki7, Esperança Sevene6,8, María Rupérez5,6, Ana Maria Fonseca5,9, Anifa Vala6, Sonia Maculuve6, Alfons Jiménez5,10, Llorenç Quintó3, Peter Ouma7, Michael Ramharter11,12,13, John J Aponte5,6, Arsenio Nhacolo6, Achille Massougbodji3, Valerie Briand1, Peter G Kremsner11,13, Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma11,13, Meghna Desai14, Eusebio Macete6, Michel Cot1, Clara Menéndez5,6, Alfredo Mayor15,16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Resistance and tolerance to Plasmodium falciparum can determine the progression of malaria disease. However, quantitative evidence of tolerance is still limited. We investigated variations in the adverse impact of P. falciparum infections among African pregnant women under different intensities of malaria transmission.Entities:
Keywords: Immunity; Malaria; Pregnancy; Resistance; Tolerance
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28712360 PMCID: PMC5513247 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0893-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Characteristics of participants by study area
| HIV-uninfecteda | HIV-infectedb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Benin | Gabon | Mozambique | All | Kenya | Mozambique | |
| n = 946 | n = 349 | n = 257 | n = 340 | n = 768 | n = 351 | n = 417 | |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | |||||||
| 24.3 (6.3) | 25.4 (5.2) | 24.4 (6.7) | 23.1 (6.8) | 26.7 (5.7) | 26.9 (5.4) | 26.5 (5.9) | |
| Parity, n (%) | |||||||
| Primigravidae | 265 (28) | 69 (20) | 66 (26) | 130 (38) | 81 (11) | 30 (9) | 51 (12) |
| Multigravidae | 681 (72) | 280 (80) | 191 (74) | 210 (62) | 687 (89) | 321 (91) | 366 (88) |
| Gestational age at baseline (weeks), mean (SD) | |||||||
| 21.0 (4.9) | 22.0 (4.1) | 19.5 (5.4) | 21.3 (5.2) | 20.3 (5.5) | 19.9 (5.9) | 20.6 (5.2) | |
| MUAC at baseline (cm), mean (SD) | |||||||
| 25.9 (3.0) | 25.3 (2.3) | 25.7 (3.6) | 26.8 (3.0) | 26.8 (2.7) | 27.0 (2.7) | 26.7 (2.7) | |
| RPR at baseline, n (%) | |||||||
| Positive | 9 (1) | 2 (1) | 1 (0) | 6 (2) | 39 (5) | 12 (3) | 27 (7) |
| Negative | 928 (99) | 347 (99) | 247 (100) | 334 (98) | 726 (95) | 338 (97) | 388 (93) |
| Literate, n (%) | |||||||
| No | 371 (39) | 280 (80) | 34 (13) | 57 (17) | 142 (18) | 16 (5) | 126 (30) |
| Yes | 575 (61) | 69 (20) | 223 (87) | 283 (83) | 626 (82) | 335 (95) | 291 (70) |
| HIV viral load (copies/mL) at baseline, n (%)c | |||||||
| < 399 | 181 (24) | 125 (36) | 56 (13) | ||||
| 400/999 | 183 (24) | 76 (22) | 107 (26) | ||||
| 1000/9999 | 243 (32) | 97 (28 | 146 (35) | ||||
| 10,000/max | 123 (16) | 49 (14) | 74 (18) | ||||
| UNK | 38 (5) | 4 (1) | 34 (8) | ||||
| CD4 (cells/μL) at baseline, n (%)d | |||||||
| < 350 | 279 (36) | 137 (39) | 142 (34) | ||||
| 350/max | 460 (60) | 212 (60) | 248 (59) | ||||
| UNK | 29 (4) | 2 (1) | 27 (6) | ||||
| Maternal haemoglobin at baseline (g/dL), mean (SD) | |||||||
| 10.4 (1.5) | 10.3 (1.2) | 10.3 (1.4) | 10.7 (1.8) | 10.1 (1.7) | 10.2 (1.9) | 10.0 (1.6) | |
| IPTp, n (%) | |||||||
| Antimalarial 1e | 629 (66) | 230 (66) | 172 (67) | 227 (67) | 390 (51) | 174 (50) | 216 (52) |
| Antimalarial 2e | 317 (34) | 119 (34) | 85 (33) | 113 (33) | 378 (49) | 177 (50) | 201 (48)) |
| Gestational age at delivery (weeks),f mean (SD) | |||||||
| 39.6 (1.7) | 39.2 (1.2) | 41.1 (1.8) | 38.9 (1.2) | 38.8 (1.2) | ND | 38.8 (1.2) | |
| Preterm birth,g n (%) | |||||||
| No | 867 (95) | 328 (95) | 238 (95) | 301 (95) | 374 (96) | ND | 374 (96) |
| Yes | 44 (5) | 16 (5) | 13 (5) | 15 (5) | 17 (4) | ND | 17 (4) |
aThe IPTp trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of two doses of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with mefloquine compared to IPTp with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
bEvaluated three doses of IPTp with MQ compared to placebo in HIV-infected women on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
c38 missing values
d29 missing values
eAntimalarial: 1 = Mefloquine and 2 = Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for HIV-uninfected; 1 = Placebo and 2 = Mefloquine for HIV-infected
fGestational age was estimated by newborn physical examination using the Ballard score
gPreterm birth if gestational age was < 37 weeks
IPTp intermittent preventive treatment, MUAC mid-upper arm circumference, RPR rapid plasma reagin, UNK unknown
Parasitological outcomes in peripheral blood and placenta by study area
| HIV-uninfected | HIV-infected | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benin | Gabon | Mozambique |
| Kenya | Mozambique |
| |
| Periphery at delivery | |||||||
| Smear, n (%) | |||||||
| Negative | 320 (92) | 245 (96) | 333 (98) | 0.002a | 332 (95) | 408 (98) | 0.025a |
| Positive | 27 (8) | 11 (4) | 7 (2) | 17 (5) | 8 (2) | ||
| qPCR, n (%) | |||||||
| Negative | 242 (69) | 235 (91) | 325 (96) | <0.001a | 326 (93) | 405 (97) | 0.007a |
| Positive | 107 (31) | 22 (9) | 15 (4) | 25 (7) | 12 (3) | ||
| qPCR parasites/μL, GM (SD) | 280.5 (882.9) | 684.2 (1703.2) | 514.4 (1630.6) | 0.484 | 141.4 (329.1) | 3350.9 (9887.2) | 0.003 |
| Placenta | |||||||
| Smear, n (%) | |||||||
| Negative | 322 (93) | 244 (96) | 332 (98) | 0.018a | 335 (95) | 406 (98) | 0.032a |
| Positive | 23 (7) | 9 (4) | 8 (2) | 16 (5) | 7 (2) | ||
| Histology, n (%) | |||||||
| Acute | 8 (2) | 5 (2) | 1 (0) | <0.001 | 6 (2) | 4 (1) | <0.001 |
| Chronic | 23 (7) | 2 (1) | 2 (1) | 5 (1) | 1 (0) | ||
| Past | 37 (11) | 28 (11) | 13 (4) | 64 (18) | 14 (3) | ||
| No infected | 277 (80) | 218 (86) | 322 (95) | 276 (79) | 387 (95) | ||
| qPCR, n (%) | |||||||
| Negative | 253 (72) | 235 (91) | 323 (95) | <0.001a | 324 (92) | 407 (98) | 0.001a |
| Positive | 96 (28) | 22 (9) | 17 (5) | 27 (8) | 10 (2) | ||
| qPCR parasites/μL, GM (SD) | 668.5 (2473.1) | 1284.9 (5100.0) | 1876.2 (5910.5) | 0.609 | 379.5 (1255.4) | 5851.3 (19950.4) | 0.033 |
| Maternal microcopy infection,b n (%) | |||||||
| Negative | 294 (87) | 239 (95) | 329 (97) | <0.001a | 325 (93) | 396 (98) | 0.002a |
| Positive | 45 (13) | 12 (5) | 9 (3) | 24 (7) | 9 (2) | ||
| Maternal qPCR infection,b n (%) | |||||||
| Negative | 206 (59) | 229 (89) | 319 (94) | <0.001a | 319 (91) | 402 (96) | <0.001a |
| Positive | 143 (41) | 28 (11) | 21 (6) | 32 (9) | 15 (4) | ||
aThe P value is significant according to multivariate analysis adjusted for type of IPTp drug, season, age, gravidity, gestational age, anaemia, literacy, RPR result and MUAC at recruitment, as well as CD4 + T cell count in the case of HIV-positive women (Wald test) (ND for placental histology)
bMaternal infections were considered microscopic if P. falciparum parasites were observed in peripheral blood at delivery or in placental blood from the maternal side either by microscopy or histology and qPCR infections if peripheral blood at delivery or placental blood samples were positive by qPCR
GM geometric mean, SD standard deviation
Fig. 1Prevalence of P. falciparum maternal infection according to study area. Prevalence of P. falciparum at delivery in peripheral and/or placental blood as detected by qPCR (a) and microscopy (b). P value according to the multivariate analysis adjusted for type of IPTp drug, season, age, gravidity, gestational age, anaemia, literacy, RPR result and MUAC at recruitment, as well as CD4 + T cell count in the case of HIV-infected women. T bars represent standard errors. B Benin, G Gabon, M Mozambique, K Kenya
Fig. 2Impact of microscopic malaria infections at delivery on pregnancy outcomes. Maternal microscopic infections were considered present if P. falciparum parasites were observed in peripheral blood at delivery and/or in the placenta either by microscopy or histology. The dot and T bar represents the mean difference and 95% confidence interval in haemoglobin levels at delivery (a, b), the difference of haemoglobin levels from recruitment to delivery (c, d), or birth weight (e, f) between malaria infected and uninfected women in the multivariate regression analysis adjusted for type of IPTp drug, season, age, gravidity, gestational age, anaemia, literacy, RPR result and MUAC at recruitment, plus CD4 + T cell count at recruitment in the case of HIV-infected women (b, d, f). Modification of the associations by study area (B Benin, G Gabon, K Kenya, M Mozambique) was determined through the inclusion of an interaction term in the regression models, and combination of the coefficients plus the interaction and the standard error was estimated by the delta method
Fig. 3Proportion of P. falciparum submicroscopic infections, PfHRP2 concentrations and antibody responses against P. falciparum antigens according to study area. Proportion of infections that are submicroscopic in peripheral (a) and placental (b) blood. P value according to the multivariate analysis adjusted for type of IPTp drug, season, age, gravidity, gestational age, anaemia, literacy, RPR result and MUAC at recruitment, as well as CD4 + T cell count in the case of HIV-infected women. T bars represent standard errors. B Benin, G Gabon, M Mozambique, K Kenya. c PfHRP2 concentrations, indicative of overall parasite biomass, among women with a peripheral qPCR-detected infection in Mozambique (M; n = 13) and Benin (B; n = 42). d Levels of IgG antibodies against MSP1 and DBL3X in Beninese (n = 170) and Mozambican (n = 170) women. e Levels of IgG antibodies against MSP1 and DBL3X by parity (primigravidae (PG) versus multigravidae (MG)), with the proportional increase (Δ) of the antibody levels plus 95% confidence interval in multigravidae versus primigravidae women. P values obtained from regression analysis adjusted for type of IPTp drug, season, gravidity, gestational age, anaemia, literacy, RPR result and MUAC at recruitment, as well as CD4 + T cell count in the case of HIV-infected women. MFI mean fluorescence intensity
Fig. 4Relationship of qPCR-detected parasite densities in peripheral blood with pregnancy outcomes. The dot and T bar represent the effect and 95% confidence interval on haemoglobin levels at delivery (a, b), the difference of haemoglobin levels from recruitment to delivery (c, d), or birth weight (e, f) due to a two-fold increase in the parasitemia levels in its natural scale. Modification of the associations by study area (B Benin, G Gabon, K Kenya, M Mozambique) was determined through the inclusion of an interaction term in the regression models, and combination of the coefficients plus the interaction and the standard error was estimated by the delta method. Analyses were adjusted for type of IPTp drug, season, age, gravidity, gestational age, anaemia, literacy, RPR result and MUAC at recruitment, as well as CD4 + T cell count in the case of HIV-infected women (b, d, f)