Literature DB >> 28711468

Effect of initiating use of an insulin pump in adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily insulin injections and continuous glucose monitoring (DIAMOND): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Roy W Beck1, Tonya D Riddlesworth2, Katrina J Ruedy2, Craig Kollman2, Andrew J Ahmann3, Richard M Bergenstal4, Anuj Bhargava5, Bruce W Bode6, Stacie Haller7, Davida F Kruger8, Janet B McGill9, William Polonsky10, David Price11, Elena Toschi12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit of initiation of insulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; CSII) in patients with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has not been studied. We aimed to assess glycaemic outcomes when switching from multiple daily injections (MDI) to CSII in adults with type 1 diabetes using CGM.
METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised controlled trial, 75 adults with type 1 diabetes in the CGM group of the DIAMOND trial were randomly assigned via the study website using a computer-generated sequence to continue MDI or switch to CSII, with continuation of CGM, for 28 weeks. The primary outcome was CGM-measured time in the glucose concentration range of 70-180 mg/dL (3·9-10·0 mmol/L). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02282397.
FINDINGS: Between April 14, 2015, and May 5, 2016, 37 participants were randomly assigned to the CGM plus CSII group and 38 participants were randomly assigned to the CGM plus MDI group. The study was completed by 36 (97%) of 37 participants in the CGM plus CSII group and 35 (92%) of 38 participants in the CGM plus MDI group. Mean CGM use was 6·7 days per week (SD 0·8) in the CGM plus CSII group and 6·9 days per week (0·3) in the CGM plus MDI group (p=0·86). No participants in the CGM plus CSII group who completed the trial discontinued CSII. Over the follow-up period, mean time in the glucose concentration range of 70-180 mg/dL (3·9-10·0 mmol/L) was 791 min per day (SD 157) in the CGM plus CSII group and 741 min per day (225) in the CGM plus MDI group (adjusted mean treatment group difference: 83 min, 95% CI 17-149; p=0·01). Participants in the CGM plus CSII group had a greater reduction in CGM-measured mean glucose (p=0·005) and hyperglycaemia (on four metrics: p=0·007 for >180 mg/dL [>10·0 mmol/L], p=0·02 for >250 mg/dL [>13·9 mmol/L], p=0·04 for >300 mg/dL [>16·6 mmol/L], and p=0·02 for the area under the curve for 180 mg/dL [10·0 mmol/L]), but also an increase in CGM-measured hypoglycaemia (p=0·0001 for <70 mg/dL [<3·9 mmol/L], p=0·0002 for <60 mg/dL [<3·3 mmol/L], p=0·0009 for <50 mg/dL [<2·8 mmol/L], p=0·0002 for the area over the curve for 70 mg/dL [3·9 mmol/L]). Mean HbA1c change from baseline to 28 weeks was 0·3% (SD 0·9; 3·3 mmol/mol [SD 9·8]) in the CGM plus CSII group and 0·1% (0·4; 1·1 mmol/mol [4·4]) in the CGM plus MDI group (p=0·32). Severe hypoglycaemia occurred in one participant in the CGM plus MDI group, and diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hyperglycaemia occurred in one participant each in the CGM plus CSII group.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that glycaemic control measured by time in the glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL (3·9-10·0 mmol/L) is improved by initiation of CSII in adults with type 1 diabetes. However, biochemical hypoglycaemia also was increased in the study, which will be important to consider when incorporating these results into clinical practice. FUNDING: Dexcom.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28711468     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30217-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


  28 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of Initiating an Insulin Pump in T1D Adults Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Wen Wan; M Reza Skandari; Alexa Minc; Aviva G Nathan; Parmida Zarei; Aaron N Winn; Michael O'Grady; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Impact of Human Factors Testing on Medical Device Design: Validation of an Automated CGM Sensor Applicator.

Authors:  Robert North; Christine Pospisil; Ryan J Clukey; Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Diabetes: Insulin pumps after injections and CGM in T1DM.

Authors:  John C Pickup
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Improved Real-World Glycemic Control With Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Predictive Alerts.

Authors:  Sinu Bessy Abraham; Siddharth Arunachalam; Alex Zhong; Pratik Agrawal; Ohad Cohen; Chantal M McMahon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-04

5.  Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.

Authors:  R Paul Wadwa; Lori M Laffel; Viral N Shah; Satish K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Satisfaction and Sustained Use of Artificial Pancreas Technology and Its Components: a Call to the Technology Field.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Laurel H Messer; Cari Berget; R Paul Wadwa; Kimberly A Driscoll
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  I Dicembrini; C Cosentino; M Monami; E Mannucci; L Pala
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 8.  Diabetes in ageing: pathways for developing the evidence base for clinical guidance.

Authors:  Medha N Munshi; Graydon S Meneilly; Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas; Kelly L Close; Paul R Conlin; Tali Cukierman-Yaffe; Angus Forbes; Om P Ganda; C Ronald Kahn; Elbert Huang; Lori M Laffel; Christine G Lee; Sei Lee; David M Nathan; Naushira Pandya; Richard Pratley; Robert Gabbay; Alan J Sinclair
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 32.069

9.  The Digital/Virtual Diabetes Clinic: The Future Is Now-Recommendations from an International Panel on Diabetes Digital Technologies Introduction.

Authors:  Moshe Phillip; Richard M Bergenstal; Kelly L Close; Thomas Danne; Satish K Garg; Lutz Heinemann; Irl B Hirsch; Boris P Kovatchev; Lori M Laffel; Viswanathan Mohan; Christopher G Parkin; Tadej Battelino
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 10.  Felix dies natalis, insulin… ceterum autem censeo "beta is better".

Authors:  Lorenzo Piemonti
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.