Literature DB >> 28710810

Putative binding sites for mir-125 family miRNAs in the mouse Lfng 3'UTR affect transcript expression in the segmentation clock, but mir-125a-5p is dispensable for normal somitogenesis.

Kanu Wahi1, Sophia Friesen1, Vincenzo Coppola2, Susan E Cole1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In vertebrate embryos, a "segmentation clock" times somitogenesis. Clock-linked genes, including Lunatic fringe (Lfng), exhibit cyclic expression in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM), with a period matching the rate of somite formation. The clock period varies widely across species, but the mechanisms that underlie this variability are not clear. The half-lives of clock components are proposed to influence the rate of clock oscillations, and are tightly regulated in the PSM. Interactions between Lfng and mir-125a-5p in the embryonic chicken PSM promote Lfng transcript instability, but the conservation of this mechanism in other vertebrates has not been tested. Here, we examine whether this interaction affects clock activity in a mammalian species.
RESULTS: Mutation of mir-125 binding sites in the Lfng 3'UTR leads to persistent, nonoscillatory reporter transcript expression in the caudal-most mouse PSM, although dynamic transcript expression recovers in the central PSM. Despite this, expression of endogenous mir-125a-5p is dispensable for mouse somitogenesis.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that mir-125a sites in the Lfng 3' untranslated region influence transcript turnover in both mouse and chicken embryos, and support the existence of position-dependent regulatory mechanisms in the PSM. They further suggest the existence of compensatory mechanisms that can rescue the loss of mir-125a-5p in mice. Developmental Dynamics 246:740-748, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3′UTR; lunatic fringe; miRNA; mir-125a-5p; posttranscriptional regulation; segmentation clock; somitogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28710810      PMCID: PMC5597482          DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.24552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  59 in total

1.  Paired-related murine homeobox gene expressed in the developing sclerotome, kidney, and nervous system.

Authors:  A Mansouri; Y Yokota; R Wehr; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; P Gruss
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 2.  The many roles of Notch signaling during vertebrate somitogenesis.

Authors:  Kanu Wahi; Matthew S Bochter; Susan E Cole
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  In vivo analysis of mRNA stability using the Tet-Off system in the chicken embryo.

Authors:  Valérie Hilgers; Olivier Pourquié; Julien Dubrulle
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Beyond secondary structure: primary-sequence determinants license pri-miRNA hairpins for processing.

Authors:  Vincent C Auyeung; Igor Ulitsky; Sean E McGeary; David P Bartel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Deficiency in WT1-targeting microRNA-125a leads to myeloid malignancies and urogenital abnormalities.

Authors:  N Tatsumi; N Hojo; O Yamada; M Ogawa; Y Katsura; S Kawata; E Morii; H Sakamoto; R Inaba; A Tsuda; I Fukuda; N Moriguchi; H Hasuwa; M Okabe; F Fujiki; S Nishida; H Nakajima; A Tsuboi; Y Oka; N Hosen; H Sugiyama; Y Oji
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Dynamic expression of lunatic fringe suggests a link between notch signaling and an autonomous cellular oscillator driving somite segmentation.

Authors:  A Aulehla; R L Johnson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Lunatic fringe protein processing by proprotein convertases may contribute to the short protein half-life in the segmentation clock.

Authors:  Emily T Shifley; Susan E Cole
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-07-25

8.  Oscillatory lunatic fringe activity is crucial for segmentation of the anterior but not posterior skeleton.

Authors:  Emily T Shifley; Kellie M Vanhorn; Ariadna Perez-Balaguer; John D Franklin; Michael Weinstein; Susan E Cole
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  A balance of positive and negative regulators determines the pace of the segmentation clock.

Authors:  Guy Wiedermann; Robert Alexander Bone; Joana Clara Silva; Mia Bjorklund; Philip J Murray; J Kim Dale
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of a Glycolytic Activity Gradient Linked to Mouse Embryo Mesoderm Development.

Authors:  Vinay Bulusu; Nicole Prior; Marteinn T Snaebjornsson; Andreas Kuehne; Katharina F Sonnen; Jana Kress; Frank Stein; Carsten Schultz; Uwe Sauer; Alexander Aulehla
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 12.270

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The vertebrate Embryo Clock: Common players dancing to a different beat.

Authors:  Gil Carraco; Ana P Martins-Jesus; Raquel P Andrade
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-08-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.