Literature DB >> 28710267

Increased Processivity, Misincorporation, and Nucleotide Incorporation Efficiency in Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4 Thumb Domain Mutants.

Li Wang1,2,3, Chenchen Liang1,2,3, Jing Wu4, Liming Liu2,3, Keith E J Tyo5.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to increase the processivity of Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase Dpo4. Protein engineering and bioinformatics were used to compile a library of potential Dpo4 mutation sites. Ten potential mutants were identified and constructed. A primer extension assay was used to evaluate the processivity of Dpo4 mutants. Thumb (A181D) and finger (E63K) domain mutants showed a processivity of 20 and 19 nucleotides (nt), respectively. A little finger domain mutant (I248Y) exhibited a processivity of 17 nt, only 1 nt more than wild-type Dpo4. Furthermore, the A181D mutant showed lower fidelity and higher nucleotide incorporation efficiency (4.74 × 10-4 s-1 μM-1) than E63K and I248Y mutants. When tasked with bypassing damage, the A181D mutant exhibited a 3.81-fold and 2.62-fold higher catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km ) at incorporating dCTP and dATP, respectively, than wild-type Dpo4. It also showed a 55% and 91.5% higher catalytic efficiency when moving beyond the damaged 8-oxoG:C and 8-oxoG:A base pairs, respectively, compared to wild-type Dpo4. Protein engineering and bioinformatics methods can effectively increase the processivity and translesion synthesis ability of Dpo4.IMPORTANCE DNA polymerases with poor fidelity can be exploited to store data and record changes in response to the intracellular environment. Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4 is such an enzyme, although its use is hindered by its low processivity. In this work, we used a bioinformatics and protein engineering approach to generate Dpo4 mutants with improved processivity. We identified the Dpo4 thumb domain as the most relevant in controlling processivity.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dpo4; binding energy; computational simulation; processivity; protein engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28710267      PMCID: PMC5583478          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01013-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  63 in total

1.  A mutant of Tetrahymena telomerase reverse transcriptase with increased processivity.

Authors:  T M Bryan; K J Goodrich; T R Cech
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Crystal structure of a DinB lesion bypass DNA polymerase catalytic fragment reveals a classic polymerase catalytic domain.

Authors:  B L Zhou; J D Pata; T A Steitz
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  DNA adduct bypass polymerization by Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase Dpo4: analysis and crystal structures of multiple base pair substitution and frameshift products with the adduct 1,N2-ethenoguanine.

Authors:  Hong Zang; Angela K Goodenough; Jeong-Yun Choi; Adriana Irimia; Lioudmila V Loukachevitch; Ivan D Kozekov; Karen C Angel; Carmelo J Rizzo; Martin Egli; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Single molecule measurement of the "speed limit" of DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Jerrod J Schwartz; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Free Energy Calculations by the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area Method.

Authors:  Nadine Homeyer; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.353

6.  The C-terminal extension of human telomerase reverse transcriptase is necessary for high affinity binding to telomeric DNA.

Authors:  Christopher G Tomlinson; Jessica K Holien; Jordan A T Mathias; Michael W Parker; Tracy M Bryan
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.079

7.  Equilibrium and stopped-flow kinetic studies of interaction between T7 RNA polymerase and its promoters measured by protein and 2-aminopurine fluorescence changes.

Authors:  Y Jia; A Kumar; S S Patel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Fidelity of Dpo4: effect of metal ions, nucleotide selection and pyrophosphorolysis.

Authors:  Alexandra Vaisman; Hong Ling; Roger Woodgate; Wei Yang
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Investigating the role of the little finger domain of Y-family DNA polymerases in low fidelity synthesis and translesion replication.

Authors:  François Boudsocq; Robert J Kokoska; Brian S Plosky; Alexandra Vaisman; Hong Ling; Thomas A Kunkel; Wei Yang; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Kinetic analysis of bypass of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine by the catalytic core of yeast DNA polymerase η.

Authors:  Qizhen Xue; Mengyu Zhong; Binyan Liu; Yong Tang; Zeliang Wei; F Peter Guengerich; Huidong Zhang
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.079

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Engineering Polymerases for New Functions.

Authors:  Timothy A Coulther; Hannah R Stern; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  An MHV-68 Mutator Phenotype Mutant Virus, Confirmed by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing of the Viral DNA Polymerase Gene, Shows Reduced Viral Fitness.

Authors:  Erika Trompet; Arturo Temblador; Sarah Gillemot; Dimitrios Topalis; Robert Snoeck; Graciela Andrei
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.