Literature DB >> 28709851

Waves of Change: National Trends in Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence.

Susan MacDonald1, Marc Colaco2, Ryan Terlecki2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the trend in surgical management of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in the context of the rate of radical prostatectomy (RP) as reported by a national database. Traditionally, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has been the gold standard, but the male sling represents a newer and popular alternative. Refinements in prostate surgery may reduce the incidence and degree of subsequent SUI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Survey database, which captures discharge data from inpatient and overnight admissions. Cases were identified by their International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure codes. We queried the codes 58.93 (implantation of AUS), 59.4 (suprapubic sling operation), 59.5 (retropubic urethral suspension), and 59.6 (paraurethral suspension). We also queried 60.5 (RP) for comparison. Data were collected from January 2000 to December 2012 and weighted to a national average using National Inpatient Survey guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 32,416 anti-incontinence operations (20,790 AUS and 11,625 sling procedures) were performed over the study period. There was a significant downward trend in the total number of incontinence procedures (F(1,11) = 6.15, P = .03). However, when stratifying the data by procedure type, only AUS placement demonstrated a significant decline (F(1,11) = 21.70, P <.01), whereas sling procedures significantly increased (F(1,11) = 12.95, P <.01). There was no significant change in the annual incidence of RP.
CONCLUSION: Inpatient surgery for male SUI is decreasing overall. Placement of the AUS declined significantly, whereas sling placement became more common. Future study will determine the etiology of these trends.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28709851     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Dual implantation of penile prosthesis and ATOMS® system for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Mirko Preto; Enrico Ammirati; Gideon Blecher; Roberto Carone; Paolo Gontero; Alessandro Giammò
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Adverse Events Associated With Synthetic Male Slings: An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

Authors:  Hanson Zhao; Colby P Souders; Paige K Kuhlmann; Kai Dallas; Karyn Eilber; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.835

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.