| Literature DB >> 28709452 |
Seok-Jae Ko1, Jae-Woo Park1, Jungtae Leem2, Ted J Kaptchuk3, Vitaly Napadow4, Braden Kuo5, Jessica Gerber4, Laurie Dimisko6, Inkwon Yeo7, Junhee Lee8, Jinsung Kim9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the treatment of functional dyspepsia, the placebo effect has been reported to be high, and the influence of the patient-practitioner relationship may be a major component of this effect. The specific and non-specific effects of acupuncture cannot be easily distinguished, and the patient-practitioner relationship may influence the total therapeutic effect in clinical practice. There have been no studies that investigate the influence of patient-practitioner relationship on acupuncture treatment for patients with functional dyspepsia.Entities:
Keywords: Acupuncture; Augmented interaction; Functional dyspepsia; Limited interaction; Randomized controlled trial
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28709452 PMCID: PMC5513038 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1869-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study
Guideline for augmented and limited interaction context
| Augmented Interaction context | Limited Interaction context |
|---|---|
| 1. Warm, Friendly Style | 1. Neutral, Impersonal Style |
| - Shake hands | - Do not initiate hand shaking |
| 2. Attentive | 2. Distracted |
| - Frequent eye contact | - Infrequent eye contact |
| 3. Active Listening | 3. Minimal Active Listening |
| - Open-ended questions that emphasize patient’s experience of illness | - Closed-ended questions (yes or no) |
| 4. Personalized Content | 4. Generic Content |
| - The clinician will encourage the patient to speak for the majority of the time | - The clinician will dominate the interview, speaking for the majority of the time |
| 5. Empathic Connection | 5. Reduced Empathy and Connection |
| - Partnership (We’ll work together) | - No expression of partnership |
| 6. Mirroring | 6. No Mirroring |
| - Mirror patient’s prosody (volume, pace, intonation) | - No effort at mirroring patient’s prosody |
Acupuncture treatment details based on the STRICTA (Macpherson H et al., [12]) checklist
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| 1. Acupuncture rationale | 1a) Style of acupuncture |
| 1b) Reasoning for treatment provided, based on historical context, literature sources, and/or consensus methods, with references where appropriate | |
| 1c) Extent to which treatment was varied | |
| 2. Details of needling | 2a) Number of needle insertions per subject per session (mean and range where relevant) |
| 2b) Names (or location if no standard name) of points used (uni/bilateral) | |
| 2c) Depth of insertion, based on a specified unit of measurement, or on a particular tissue level | |
| 2d) Response sought (e.g. de qi or muscle twitch response) | |
| 2e) Needle stimulation (e.g. manual, electrical) | |
| 2f) Needle retention time | |
| 2g) Needle type (diameter, length, and manufacturer or material) | |
| 3. Treatment regimen | 3a) Number of treatment sessions |
| 3b) Frequency and duration of treatment sessions | |
| 4. Other components of treatment | 4a) Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group (e.g. moxibustion, cupping, herbs, exercises, lifestyle advice) |
| 4b) Setting and context of treatment, including instructions to practitioners, and information and explanations to patients | |
| 5. Practitioner background | 5) Description of participating acupuncturists (qualification or professional affiliation, years in acupuncture practice, other relevant experience) |
| 6. Control or comparator interventions | 6a) Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research question, with sources that justify this choice |
| 6b) Precise description of the control or comparator. If sham acupuncture or any other type of acupuncture-like control is used, provide details as for Items 1 to 3 above. |
LI Large intestine meridian, ST Stomach meridian, LR Liver meridian, PC Pericardium meridian, SP Spleen meridian
The schedule of enrollment, intervention, and assessments
| Study period | Screening | Acupuncture treatment period | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visit | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 | v8 | |
| Week | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
| Patients | |||||||||
| Informed Consent | √ | ||||||||
| Demographics | √ | ||||||||
| Physical examination | √ | ||||||||
| History Examination | √ | ||||||||
| Dyspepsia History Examination | √ | ||||||||
| Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria | √ | ||||||||
| Serologic test/ Evaluation | √ | ||||||||
| BDI | √ | ||||||||
| Randomization | √ | ||||||||
| Trial evaluation | |||||||||
| Investigation of Concomitant medication | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | |
| Adverse events | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | |
| Outcomes | |||||||||
| AR of abdominal pain & discomfort | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | √* | ||
| VAS for dyspepsia | √ | √* | √† | ||||||
| Expectations for Relief Scale | √* | √* | √* | ||||||
| MASS | à | à | à | à | à | à | à | à | |
| The CARE measure | à | à | |||||||
| IRI | à | à | |||||||
| NDI | √* | √† | |||||||
| SF-36 | √* | √† | |||||||
| STAI | √* | √† | |||||||
| PRISM | √* | √† | |||||||
| Nutrition drink test | √* | √† | |||||||
| Intervention | |||||||||
| Acupuncture treatment | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
*, conducted before acupuncture treatment; †, conducted after acupuncture treatment; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; AR Adequate Relief, VAS Visual analog scale, MASS Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale, CARE Consultation and Relational Empathy, IRI Interpersonal Reactivty Index, NDI Nepean Dyspepsia Index, SF-36 Short Form 36-item Health Survey, STAI State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, PRISM Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure