| Literature DB >> 28709424 |
Remberto Marcelo Argandoña Valdez1,2, Cristiane Duque3, Karina Sampaio Caiaffa4, Vanessa Rodrigues Dos Santos4, Maria Luiza de Aguiar Loesch4, Natalia Helena Colombo4, Rodrigo Alex Arthur5, Thais de Cássia Negrini5, Marcelo Fabiano Gomes Boriollo6,7, Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early childhood caries (ECC) is an aggressive condition that can affect teeth of young children. This study aimed to evaluate genotypic diversity and phenotypic traits of S. mutans isolated from dental biofilms of children with different caries status in comparison with caries free (CF) children.Entities:
Keywords: Acidogenicity; Aciduricity; Dental biofilm; Early childhood caries; Genotypic diversity; Streptococcus mutans
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28709424 PMCID: PMC5512815 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0406-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Description of the study population
| CF | ECC | S-ECC |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months; mean ± SD) | 44.4 ± 8.19A | 45.88 ± 9.42A | 46.37 ± 6.32A | 0.67 |
| dmfs* (mean ± SD) | 0A | 3.11 ± 1.83B | 22.6 ± 23.21C | 0.00 |
|
| 30 (78.9) a | 32 (91.42) a,b | 36 (100) b | 0.00 |
| Total | 21(14) a | 20(12) a | 18(8) a | 0.62 |
*dmsf: tooth surfaces with caries (decay), indicated for extraction (missing) and filled
ADifferent uppercase letters shows statistical difference among CF, ECC and S-ECC groups, according to ANOVA/Tukey tests (p < 0.05)
aDifferent lower case letters shows statistical difference among CF, ECC and S-ECC groups, according to Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (p < 0.05)
**Percentage calculated in relation to total number of MS isolated in each tested condition
Fig. 1Dendrogram with genetic similarity indices (AP-PCR method, primer OPA-02) verified among S. mutans strains sampled from biofilm of CF, ECC and S-ECC children. Individual bands were analyzed by matrices generated by UPGMA analysis using coefficient SSM (simple matching). Tonalities of gray in the dendrogram illustrate identical or highly related isolates (SSM ≥ 0.819 ± 0.161)
Fig. 2Acidogenicity (acid production). a Glycolytic curves. Means of pH values through glycolysis. b Means of the area under the curve (AUC) of glycolytic pH fall. Bars denote standard deviation for both Figures a and b. *No difference in pH values among CF, ECC and S-ECC genotypes, for any time point. Different uppercase letters shows statistical difference among CF, ECC and S-ECC genotypes by ANOVA test
Fig. 3Aciduricity (acid tolerance). Percentage of bacterial growth (T60) in relation to T0 (100%) in pH 2.8, pH. 5.0 and pH 7.0. * Statistical difference between CF and S-ECC pH by Mann-Whitney tests (p < 0.05). Box plots: bars indicate minimum and maximum values. Black and white boxes indicate lower and upper quartiles, respectively. Line in the middle of boxes is median
Fig. 4Biofilm formation. Absorbance values (550 nm) obtained for 48 h biofilm of S. mutans genotypes from CF, ECC and S-ECC children. Different letters show statistical difference among the groups, according to ANOVA/Tukey tests (p < 0.05)