Literature DB >> 3015800

Acid tolerance, proton permeabilities, and membrane ATPases of oral streptococci.

G R Bender, S V Sutton, R E Marquis.   

Abstract

Differences in acid tolerance among representative oral streptococci were found to be related more closely to the dynamic permeabilities of the bacteria to protons than to differences in the sensitivities of cell membranes to gross damage caused by environmental acidification. For Streptococcus mutans GS-5, Streptococcus sanguis NCTC 10904, and Streptococcus salivarius ATCC 13419, gross membrane damage, indicated by the release of magnesium from whole cells, occurred at pH values below about 4 and was rapid and extensive at pH values of about 3 or less. A more aciduric, lactic acid bacterium, Lactobacillus casei ATCC 4646, was more resistant to environmental acidification, and gross membrane damage was evident only at pH values below 3. Assessments of the movements of protons into S. mutans cells after an acid pulse at various pH values indicated that permeability to protons was minimal at a pH value of about 5, at which the average half time for pH equilibration across the cell membrane was about 12 min. The corresponding values for the less aciduric organism S. sanguis were pH 7 and 8.2 min, and the values for the intermediate organism S. salivarius were pH 6 and 6.6 min. The ATPase inhibitor dicyclohexylcarbodiimide acted to increase markedly the permeability of each organism to protons, and this action indicated that permeability involved not only the passive inflow of protons but also active outflow through the proton-translocating membrane ATPase. Membranes were isolated from each of the bacteria, and pH profiles for ATPase activities indicated pH optima of about 7.5, 7.0, 6.0, and 5.0 for S. sanguis, S. salivarius, S. mutans, and L. casei, respectively. Thus, the pH profiles for the enzymes reflected the acid tolerances of the bacteria and the permeabilities of whole cells to protons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3015800      PMCID: PMC260879          DOI: 10.1128/iai.53.2.331-338.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  13 in total

1.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Reduction of acidurance of streptococcal growth and glycolysis by fluoride and gramicidin.

Authors:  G R Bender; E A Thibodeau; R E Marquis
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Enhanced transmembrane proton conductance in Streptococcus mutans GS-5 due to ionophores and fluoride.

Authors:  A D Eisenberg; R E Marquis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Comparison of methods for monitoring changes in the pH of human dental plaque.

Authors:  C F Schachtele; M E Jensen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Membrane H+ conductance of Streptococcus lactis.

Authors:  P C Maloney
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Enolases from fluoride-sensitive and fluoride-resistant streptococci.

Authors:  F J Bunick; S Kashket
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Relationship of bioenergetic processes to the pathogenic properties of oral bacteria.

Authors:  P D Marsh; C W Keevil; D C Ellwood
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Acid-base titration of streptococci and the physical states of intracellular ions.

Authors:  R E Marquis; N Porterfield; P Matsumura
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Effect of gramicidin D on the acidogenic properties of oral streptococci and human dental plaque.

Authors:  C Vadeboncoeur; M Proulx; L Trahan
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Dissipation of the proton motive force in oral streptococci by fluoride.

Authors:  S Kashket; E R Kashket
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  104 in total

1.  Survival of low-pH stress by Escherichia coli O157:H7: correlation between alterations in the cell envelope and increased acid tolerance.

Authors:  K N Jordan; L Oxford; C P O'Byrne
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Defects in D-alanyl-lipoteichoic acid synthesis in Streptococcus mutans results in acid sensitivity.

Authors:  D A Boyd; D G Cvitkovitch; A S Bleiweis; M Y Kiriukhin; D V Debabov; F C Neuhaus; I R Hamilton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Characterization of the sat operon in Streptococcus mutans: evidence for a role of Ffh in acid tolerance.

Authors:  B H Kremer; M van der Kraan; P J Crowley; I R Hamilton; L J Brady; A S Bleiweis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH.

Authors:  Paul D Cotter; Colin Hill
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Analysis of an agmatine deiminase gene cluster in Streptococcus mutans UA159.

Authors:  Ann R Griswold; Yi-Ywan M Chen; Robert A Burne
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of S-ribosylhomocysteinase from Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Hui Li; Hongyan Zhao; Laikuan Zhu; Lihua Hong; Hong Zhang; Fanjing Lin; Chunyan Xu; Shentao Li; Zhimin Zhang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2012-01-26

7.  The F-ATPase operon promoter of Streptococcus mutans is transcriptionally regulated in response to external pH.

Authors:  Wendi L Kuhnert; Guolu Zheng; Roberta C Faustoferri; Robert G Quivey
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to visualize rhodopsin-containing cells.

Authors:  J L Keffer; C R Sabanayagam; M E Lee; E F DeLong; M W Hahn; J A Maresca
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Does Curcumin Have an Anticaries Effect? A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Ailin Ehteshami; Farinaz Shirban; Fateme Gharibpour; Mohammad Bagherniya; Thozhukat Sathyapalan; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Evolutionary and population genomics of the cavity causing bacteria Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Omar E Cornejo; Tristan Lefébure; Paulina D Pavinski Bitar; Ping Lang; Vincent P Richards; Kirsten Eilertson; Thuy Do; David Beighton; Lin Zeng; Sang-Joon Ahn; Robert A Burne; Adam Siepel; Carlos D Bustamante; Michael J Stanhope
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.