Literature DB >> 2870885

Prospective study of clinical and biochemical features of symptomatic choledocholithiasis.

M L Anciaux, G Pelletier, P Attali, B Meduri, C Liguory, J P Etienne.   

Abstract

One hundred consecutive patients were prospectively studied to assess the clinical and biochemical features of symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Biochemical tests were performed during the three days following the onset of symptoms. Pain was the most frequent symptom of choledocholithiasis, observed in 75% of the patients, but rarely occurred alone (12%). Clinical symptoms were not different according to age. High serum gamma glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase were the most frequent biochemical abnormalities in patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis: they were increased in 94 and 91% of cases, respectively. Only one patient had no biochemical abnormality. Serum transaminases could reach very high levels just as in hepatitis. Biochemical data did not differ regardless of whether the common bile duct was enlarged or not. Biochemical abnormalities had been studied over the first 10 days of spontaneous evolution in 25 patients while choledocholithiasis persisted: serum bilirubin and transaminases significantly decreased while serum gamma glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, and amylase remained unchanged. These results indicate that, in patients with suggestive symptoms, choledocholithiasis is unlikely in the absence of biochemical abnormalities in the first three days following the onset of symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2870885     DOI: 10.1007/bf01320306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  16 in total

1.  Surgery of the biliary tract. III. Secondary operations on the common bile duct.

Authors:  M K BARLETT; W C QUINBY
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1957-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Residual stone in the biliary ducts.

Authors:  F B THOMSON
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1956-07

3.  Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  J R Rubin; J M Beal
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1983-01

4.  Preoperative and postoperative enzyme changes in patients with gallstones.

Authors:  D M Grace; A R Henderson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1978-08

5.  [Per-operative cholangiography in cholelithiasis: diagnostic value (author's transl)].

Authors:  F Desmaiziéres; F Lacaine; M Huguier
Journal:  Nouv Presse Med       Date:  1978-04-29

Review 6.  Ultrasonography of the biliary tract.

Authors:  K Okuda; Y Tsuchiya
Journal:  Prog Liver Dis       Date:  1982

7.  The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  M F Graham; P L Cooperberg; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Accuracy of common hapatic duct size in the evaluation of extrahepatic biliary obstruction.

Authors:  P L Cooperberg; D Li; P Wong; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Abnormal liver function tests in acute cholecystitis; the predicting of common duct stones.

Authors:  H Järvinen
Journal:  Ann Clin Res       Date:  1978-12

10.  Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  F Lacaine; M B Corlette; H Bismuth
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-09
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Edoardo G Giannini; Roberto Testa; Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis.

Authors:  Patrick Mosler
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-04

3.  Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T H Liu; E T Consorti; A Kawashima; E P Tamm; K L Kwong; B S Gill; J H Sellin; E K Peden; D W Mercer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

Authors:  F Prat; B Meduri; B Ducot; R Chiche; R Salimbeni-Bartolini; G Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 6.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 7.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

8.  Selection criteria for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) in patients with gallstone disease.

Authors:  E Trondsen; B Edwin; O Reiertsen; H Fagertun; A R Rosseland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Endoscopic therapy for bile duct stones in a geriatric population.

Authors:  J R Croker; S G Williams; M Charlton; D Vaira; J Dowsett
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  What is the real function of the liver 'function' tests?

Authors:  Philip Hall; Johnny Cash
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2012-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.