| Literature DB >> 28708066 |
Mohamed Al-Fandi1,2, Nida Alshraiedeh3, Rami Oweis4, Hala Alshdaifat5, Omamah Al-Mahaseneh6, Khadijah Al-Tall7, Rawan Alawneh8.
Abstract
This paper reports a novel self-detection method for tumor cells using living nano-robots. These living robots are a nonpathogenic strain of E. coli bacteria equipped with naturally synthesized bio-nano-sensory systems that have an affinity to VEGF, an angiogenic factor overly-expressed by cancer cells. The VEGF-affinity/chemotaxis was assessed using several assays including the capillary chemotaxis assay, chemotaxis assay on soft agar, and chemotaxis assay on solid agar. In addition, a microfluidic device was developed to possibly discover tumor cells through the overexpressed vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Various experiments to study the sensing characteristic of the nano-robots presented a strong response toward the VEGF. Thus, a new paradigm of selective targeting therapies for cancer can be advanced using swimming E. coli as self-navigator miniaturized robots as well as drug-delivery vehicles.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; bio-nanosensor; cancer therapy; chemotaxis; microfluidics; nano-robot
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28708066 PMCID: PMC5539797 DOI: 10.3390/s17071580
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Schematic of the microfluidic chip for motility chemotaxis; (b) Optical image of the chemotaxis microfluidic chip using agarose gel (source, central, sink channels).
Figure 2Chemotaxis assay using the disc method on soft agar at (10×) magnification, (a) Nickel (chemo repellant): a clear zone was formed around the disc; (b) Water was used as control, it elicits no chemotactic responses from E. coli; (c) Glucose (chemoattractant): a turbid zone was formed; (d) VEGF (potential chemo attractant): a turbid zone was formed.
Figure 3Chemotaxis assay using the disc method on solid agar at (10×) magnification, (a) VEGF (potential chemoattractant): a dense ring was formed; and (b) water used as control elicited no chemotactic responses from E. coli.
Figure 4E. coli chemotaxis toward water, glucose, and VEGF by capillary assay.
Figure 5(a) Chemotaxis assay using fabricated microfluidic chip at (400×) magnification. Bacterial response to the glucose gradient at the central channel, the left channel of the chip was filled with 10 μL glucose solution (3 mg/mL), the right channel was filled with 10 μL deionized water. The histogram represents the cell distribution across the bacterial channel versus the position in the channel, the distribution values showed bias toward the highest concentration of glucose. The distribution of bacteria across its channel was analyzed using Image J software. (b) Chemotaxis assay using fabricated microfluidic chip at (400×) magnification. Bacterial response to the VEGF gradient at the central channel, the left channel of the chip was filled with 10 μL VEGF solution (10 μg/10 μL), the right channel was filled with 10 μL buffer solution (deionized water). The histogram represents the cell distribution across the bacterial channel versus the position in the channel, the distribution values showed bias toward the highest concentration of VEGF.