Literature DB >> 28707532

A novel diagnostic aid for intra-abdominal adhesion detection in cine-MRI: pilot study and initial diagnostic impressions.

David Randall1, Frank Joosten2, Richard Peter Ten Broek3, Richard Gillott4, Karna Dev Bardhan4, Chema Strik3, Wiesje Prins2, Harry van Goor3, John Wesley Fenner1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A non-invasive diagnostic technique for abdominal adhesions is not currently available. Capture of abdominal motion due to respiration in cine-MRI has shown promise, but is difficult to interpret. This article explores the value of a complimentary diagnostic aid to facilitate the non-invasive detection of abdominal adhesions using cine-MRI.
METHOD: An image processing technique was developed to quantify the amount of sliding that occurs between the organs of the abdomen and the abdominal wall in sagittal cine-MRI slices. The technique produces a "sheargram" which depicts the amount of sliding which has occurred over 1-3 respiratory cycles. A retrospective cohort of 52 patients, scanned for suspected adhesions, made 281 cine-MRI sagittal slices available for processing. The resulting sheargrams were reported by two operators and compared with expert clinical judgment of the cine-MRI scans.
RESULTS: The sheargram matched clinical judgment in 84% of all sagittal slices and 93-96% of positive adhesions were identified on the sheargram. The sheargram displayed a slight skew towards sensitivity over specificity, with a high positive adhesion detection rate but at the expense of false positives.
CONCLUSION: Good correlation between sheargram and absence/presence of inferred adhesions indicates quantification of sliding motion has potential to aid adhesion detection in cine-MRI. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first attempt to clinically evaluate a novel image processing technique quantifying the sliding motion of the abdominal contents against the abdominal wall. The results of this pilot study reveal its potential as a diagnostic aid for detection of abdominal adhesions.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28707532      PMCID: PMC5858811          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

1.  Detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions by using functional cine MR imaging: preliminary results.

Authors:  A Lienemann; D Sprenger; H O Steitz; M Korell; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Incidence of intraabdominal adhesions in a continuous series of 1000 laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Jean Dubuisson; Revaz Botchorishvili; Sandrine Perrette; Nicolas Bourdel; Kris Jardon; Benoît Rabischong; Michel Canis; Gérard Mage
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Intra-abdominal adhesions: definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options.

Authors:  Dörthe Brüggmann; Garri Tchartchian; Markus Wallwiener; Karsten Münstedt; Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg; Andreas Hackethal
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994.

Authors:  N F Ray; W G Denton; M Thamer; S C Henderson; S Perry
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Towards radiological diagnosis of abdominal adhesions based on motion signatures derived from sequences of cine-MRI images.

Authors:  John Fenner; Benjamin Wright; Jonathan Emberey; Paul Spencer; Richard Gillott; Angela Summers; Charles Hutchinson; Pat Lawford; Paul Brenchley; Karna Dev Bardhan
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Long-term follow-up and cost analysis following surgery for small bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  B Tingstedt; J Isaksson; R Andersson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Cine-MRI detection of intraabdominal adhesions: correlation with intraoperative findings in 89 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Reinhold A Lang; Sonja Buhmann; Alexander Hopman; Heinrich-Otto Steitz; Andreas Lienemann; Maximilian F Reiser; Karl-Walter Jauch; Thomas P Hüttl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis.

Authors:  Richard P G ten Broek; Yama Issa; Evert J P van Santbrink; Nicole D Bouvy; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Johannes Jeekel; Erica A Bakkum; Maroeska M Rovers; Harry van Goor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-10-03

9.  A Novel Diagnostic Aid for Detection of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions to the Anterior Abdominal Wall Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  David Randall; John Fenner; Richard Gillott; Richard Ten Broek; Chema Strik; Paul Spencer; Karna Dev Bardhan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 2.260

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Dehghani Firoozabadi; Abbas Alibakhshi; Hoorieh Alaeen; Sanaz Zand; Ryan Nazemian; Maryam Rahmani
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-06

2.  Difficulty in predicting intra-abdominal adhesion before cesarean section: A case report.

Authors:  Nanao Suzuki; Yu Wakaki; Kaori Watanabe; Yukiko Kumasaka; Rika Suzuki
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-27

3.  Does applied ultrasound prior to laparoscopy predict the existence of intra-abdominal adhesions?

Authors:  Hilal Uslu Yuvaci; Arif Serhan Cevrioğlu; Yasemin Gündüz; Nermin Akdemir; Alper Karacan; Ünal Erkorkmaz; Abdurrahim Keskin
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 0.973

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.